An official website of the United States government
Research in Responsible AI has developed a range of principles and practices to ensure that machine learning systems are used in a manner that is ethical and aligned with human values. However, a critical yet often neglected aspect of ethical ML is the ethical implications that appear when designing evaluations of ML systems. For instance, teams may have to balance a trade-off between highly informative tests to ensure downstream product safety, with potential fairness harms inherent to the implemented testing procedures. We conceptualize ethics-related concerns in standard ML evaluation techniques. Specifically, we present a utility framework, characterizing the key trade-off in ethical evaluation as balancing information gain against potential ethical harms. The framework is then a tool for characterizing challenges teams face, and systematically disentangling competing considerations that teams seek to balance. Differentiating between different types of issues encountered in evaluation allows us to highlight best practices from analogous domains, such as clinical trials and automotive crash testing, which navigate these issues in ways that can offer inspiration to improve evaluation processes in ML. Our analysis underscores the critical need for development teams to deliberately assess and manage ethical complexities that arise during the evaluation of ML systems, and for the industry to move towards designing institutional policies to support ethical evaluations.
more »
« less
MLTEing Models: Negotiating, Evaluating, and Documenting Model and System Qualities
Many organizations seek to ensure that machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) systems work as intended in production but currently do not have a cohesive methodology in place to do so. To fill this gap, we propose MLTE (Machine Learning Test and Evaluation, colloquially referred to as "melt"), a framework and implementation to evaluate ML models and systems. The framework compiles state-of-the-art evaluation techniques into an organizational process for interdisciplinary teams, including model developers, software engineers, system owners, and other stakeholders. MLTE tooling supports this process by providing a domain-specific language that teams can use to express model requirements, an infrastructure to define, generate, and collect ML evaluation metrics, and the means to communicate results.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2131477
- PAR ID:
- 10444834
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Results (ICSE-NIER)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 31 to 36
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The introduction of machine learning (ML) components in software projects has created the need for software engineers to collaborate with data scientists and other specialists. While collaboration can always be challenging, ML introduces additional challenges with its exploratory model development process, additional skills and knowledge needed, difficulties testing ML systems, need for continuous evolution and monitoring, and non-traditional quality requirements such as fairness and explainability. Through interviews with 45 practitioners from 28 organizations, we identified key collaboration challenges that teams face when building and deploying ML systems into production. We report on common collaboration points in the development of production ML systems for requirements, data, and integration, as well as corresponding team patterns and challenges. We find that most of these challenges center around communication, documentation, engineering, and process, and collect recommendations to address these challenges.more » « less
-
In this paper, we outline a new method for evaluating the human impact of machine-learning (ML) applications. In partnership with Underwriters Laboratories Inc., we have developed a framework to evaluate the impacts of a particular use of machine learning that is based on the goals and values of the domain in which that application is deployed. By examining the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in particular domains, such as journalism, criminal justice, or law, we can develop more nuanced and practically relevant understandings of key ethical guidelines for artificial intelligence. By decoupling the extraction of the facts of the matter from the evaluation of the impact of the resulting systems, we create a framework for the process of assessing impact that has two distinctly different phases.more » « less
-
Poole, Steve; Hernandez, Oscar; Baker, Matthew; Curtis, Tony (Ed.)SHMEM-ML is a domain specific library for distributed array computations and machine learning model training & inference. Like other projects at the intersection of machine learning and HPC (e.g. dask, Arkouda, Legate Numpy), SHMEM-ML aims to leverage the performance of the HPC software stack to accelerate machine learning workflows. However, it differs in a number of ways. First, SHMEM-ML targets the full machine learning workflow, not just model training. It supports a general purpose nd-array abstraction commonly used in Python machine learning applications, and efficiently distributes transformation and manipulation of this ndarray across the full system. Second, SHMEM-ML uses OpenSHMEM as its underlying communication layer, enabling high performance networking across hundreds or thousands of distributed processes. While most past work in high performance machine learning has leveraged HPC message passing communication models as a way to efficiently exchange model gradient updates, SHMEM-ML’s focus on the full machine learning lifecycle means that a more flexible and adaptable communication model is needed to support both fine and coarse grain communication. Third, SHMEM-ML works to interoperate with the broader Python machine learning software ecosystem. While some frameworks aim to rebuild that ecosystem from scratch on top of the HPC software stack, SHMEM-ML is built on top of Apache Arrow, an in-memory standard for data formatting and data exchange between libraries. This enables SHMEM-ML to share data with other libraries without creating copies of data. This paper describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of SHMEM-ML – demonstrating a general purpose system for data transformation and manipulation while achieving up to a 38× speedup in distributed training performance relative to the industry standard Horovod framework without a regression in model metrics.more » « less
-
Thanks to the numerous machine learning based malware detection (MLMD) research in recent years and the readily available online malware scanning system (e.g., VirusTotal), it becomes relatively easy to build a seemingly successful MLMD system using the following standard procedure: first prepare a set of ground truth data by checking with VirusTotal, then extract features from training dataset and build a machine learning detection model, and finally evaluate the model with a disjoint testing dataset. We argue that such evaluation methods do not expose the real utility of ML based malware detection in practice since the ML model is both built and tested on malware that are known at the time of training. The user could simply run them through VirusTotal just as how the researchers obtained the ground truth, instead of using the more sophisticated ML approach. However, ML based malware detection has the potential of identifying malware that has not been known at the time of training, which is the real value ML brings to this problem. We present experimentation study on how well a machine learning based malware detection system can achieve this. Our experiments showed that MLMD can consistently generate previously unknown malware knowledge, e.g., malware that is not detectable by existing malware detection systems at MLMD’s training time. Our research illustrates an ideal usage scenario for MLMD systems and demonstrates that such systems can benefit malware detection in practice. For example, by utilizing the new signals provided by the MLMD system and the detection capability of existing malware detection systems, we can more quickly uncover new malware variants or families.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-NIER58687.2023.00012
