An official website of the United States government
Abstract Tides in coastal rivers drive river‐groundwater (hyporheic) exchange and provide opportunities for nitrate removal that may improve coastal water quality. Silt and sand layers in coastal floodplain sediments can alter the flow and transformation of nitrate. Our goal was to understand how sediment heterogeneity influences nitrogen dynamics near tidal rivers. Numerical simulations show that oxic, variably saturated sand layers and anoxic, organic‐rich silt layers are sites of nitrification and denitrification, respectively. The exchange of river water and nitrate through heterogeneous sediments increases with sand fraction, as sand lenses become longer and more connected. The amount of nitrate removed from river water also increases but represents a smaller portion of total nitrate exchange through the hyporheic zone, causing removal efficiency to decline. Our results suggest that accurate characterization of aquifer heterogeneity leads to an improved understanding of sites of nutrient transformation within floodplain sediments.
more »
« less
A Model Analysis of the Tidal Engine That Drives Nitrogen Cycling in Coastal Riparian Aquifers
Abstract In coastal rivers, tides facilitate surface water‐groundwater exchange and strongly coupled nitrification‐denitrification near the fluctuating water table. We used numerical fluid flow and reactive transport models to explore hydrogeologic and biogeochemical controls on nitrogen transport along an idealized tidal freshwater zone based on field observations from White Clay Creek, Delaware, USA. The capacity of the riparian aquifer to remove nitrate depends largely on nitrate transport rates, which initially increase with increasing tidal range but then decline as sediments become muddier and permeability decreases. Over the entire model reach, local nitrification provides a similar amount of nitrate as surface and groundwater contributions combined. More than half (~66%) of nitrate removed via denitrification is produced in situ, while the vast majority of remaining nitrate removed comes from groundwater sources. In contrast, average nitrate removal from surface water due to tidal pumping amounts to only ~1% of the average daily in‐channel riverine nitrate load or 1.77 kg of nitrate along the reach each day. As a result, tidal bank storage zones may not be major sinks for nitrate in coastal rivers but can act as effective sinks for groundwater nitrate. By extension, tidal bank storage zones provide a critical ecosystem service, reducing contributions of groundwater nitrate, which is often derived from septic tanks and fertilizers, to coastal rivers.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10445901
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Water Resources Research
- Volume:
- 56
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 0043-1397
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Subterranean estuaries (STEs) form at the land‐sea boundary where groundwater and seawater mix. These biogeochemically reactive zones influence groundwater‐borne nutrient concentrations and speciation prior to export via submarine groundwater discharge (SGD). We examined a STE located along the York River Estuary (YRE) to determine if SGD delivers dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and phosphorus (DIP) to the overlying water. We assessed variations in STE geochemical profiles with depth across locations, times, and tidal stages, estimated N removal along the STE flow path, measured hydraulic gradients to estimate SGD, and calculated potential nutrient fluxes. Salinity, dissolved oxygen (DO), DIN, and DIP varied significantly with depth and season (p < 0.05), but not location or tidal stage. Ammonium dominated the DIN pool deep in the STE. Moving toward the sediment surface, ammonium concentrations decreased as nitrate and DO concentrations increased, suggesting nitrification. Potential sediment N removal rates mediated by denitrification were <8 mmoles N m−2 d−1. The total groundwater discharge rate was 38 ± 11 L m−2 d−1; discharge followed tidal and seasonal patterns. Net SGD nutrient fluxes were 0.065–3.2 and 0.019–0.093 mmoles m−2 d−1for DIN and DIP, respectively. However, microbial N removal in the STE may attenuate 0.58% to >100% of groundwater DIN. SGD fluxes were on the same order of magnitude as diffusive benthic fluxes but accounted for <10% of the nutrients delivered by fluvial advection in the YRE. Our results indicate the importance of STE biogeochemical transformations to SGD flux estimations and their role in coastal eutrophication and nutrient dynamics.more » « less
-
Abstract Riparian zones are key ecotones that buffer aquatic ecosystems through removal of nitrogen (N) via processes such as denitrification. However, how dams alter riparian N cycling and buffering capacity is poorly understood. Here, we hypothesized that elevated groundwater and anoxia due to the backup of stream water above milldams may enhance denitrification. We assessed denitrification rates (using denitrification enzyme assays) and potential controlling factors in riparian sediments at various depths upstream and downstream of two relict U.S. mid‐Atlantic milldams. Denitrification was not significantly different between upstream and downstream, although was greater per river km upstream considering deeper and wider geometries. Further, denitrification typically occurred in hydrologically variable shallow sediments where nitrate‐N and organic matter were most concentrated. At depths below 1 m, both denitrification and nitrate‐N decreased while ammonium‐N concentrations substantially increased, indicating suppression of ammonium consumption or dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium. These results suggest that denitrification occurs where dynamic groundwater levels result in higher rates of nitrification and mineralization, while another N process that produces ammonium‐N competes with denitrification for limited nitrate‐N at deeper, more stagnant/poorly mixed depths. Ultimately, while it is unclear whether relict milldams are sources of N, limited denitrification rates indicate that they are not always effective sinks; thus, milldam removal—especially accompanied by removal of ammonium‐N rich legacy sediments—may improve riparian N buffering.more » « less
-
Abstract Dam removals are on the increase across the US with Pennsylvania currently leading the nation. While most dam removals are driven by aquatic habitat and public safety considerations, we know little about how dam removals impact water quality and riparian zone processes. Dam removals decrease the stream base level, which results in dewatering of the riparian zone. We hypothesized that this dewatering of the riparian zone would increase nitrification and decrease denitrification, and thus result in nitrogen (N) leakage from riparian zones. This hypothesis was tested for a 1.5 m high milldam removal. Stream, soil water, and groundwater N concentrations were monitored over 2 years. Soil N concentrations and process rates andδ15N values were also determined. Denitrification rates and soilδ15N values in riparian sediments decreased supporting our hypothesis but no significant changes in nitrification were observed. While surficial soil water nitrate‐N concentrations were high (median 4.5 mg N L−1), riparian groundwater nitrate‐N values were low (median 0.09 mg N L−1), indicating that nitrate‐N leakage was minimal. We attribute the low groundwater nitrate‐N to denitrification losses at the lower, more dynamic, groundwater interface and/or dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA). Stream water nitrate‐N concentrations were high (median 7.6 mg N L−1) and contrary to our dam‐removal hypothesis displayed a watershed‐wide decline that was attributed to regional hydrologic changes. This study provided important first insights on how dam removals could affect N cycle processes in riparian zones and its implications for water quality and watershed management.more » « less
-
Groundwater discharge to rivers takes many forms, including preferential groundwater discharge points (PDPs) along riverbanks that are exposed at low flows, with multi-scale impacts on aquatic habitat and water quality. The physical controls on the spatial distribution of PDPs along riverbanks are not well-defined, rendering their prediction and representation in models challenging. To investigate the local riverbank sediment controls on PDP occurrence, we tested drone-based and handheld thermal infrared to efficiently map PDP locations along two mainstem rivers. Early in the study, we found drone imaging was better suited to locating tributary and stormwater inflows, which created relatively large water surface thermal anomalies in winter, compared to PDPs that often occurred at the sub-meter scale and beneath riparian tree canopy. Therefore, we primarily used handheld thermal infrared imaging from watercraft to map PDPs and larger seepage faces along 12-km of the fifth-order Housatonic River in Massachusetts, USA and 26-km of the Farmington River in Connecticut, USA. Overall, we mapped 31 riverbank PDPs along the Housatonic reach that meanders through lower permeability soils, and 104 PDPs along the Farmington reach that cuts through sandier sediments. Riverbank soil parameters extracted at PDP locations from the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database did not differ substantially from average bank soils along either reach, although the Farmington riverbank soils were on average 5× more permeable than Housatonic riverbank soils, likely contributing to the higher observed prevalence of PDPs. Dissolved oxygen measured in discharge water at these same PDPs varied widely, but showed no relation to measured sand, clay, or organic matter content in surficial soils indicating a lack of substantial near-surface aerobic reaction. The PDP locations were investigated for the presence of secondary bank structures, and commonly co-occurred with riparian tree root masses indicating the importance of localized physical controls on the spatial distribution of riverbank PDPs.more » « less
