An official website of the United States government
Abstract Body‐to‐surface wave scattering, originated from strong lateral heterogeneity, has been observed and modeled for decades. Compared to body waves, scattered surface waves propagate along the Earth's surface with less energy loss and, thus, can be observed over a wider distance range. In this study, we utilize surface waves converted from teleseismicSHorSdiffwave incidence to map strong lateral heterogeneities across the entire contiguous United States. We apply array‐based phase coherence analysis to broadband waveforms recorded by the USArray Transportable Array and other permanent/temporary networks to detect coherent signals that are associated with body‐to‐surface wave scattering. We then locate the source of the scattering by back‐propagating the beamformed energy using both straight‐ray and curved‐ray approximations. Our results show that the distribution of scatterers correlates well with known geological features across the contiguous United States. Topographic/bathymetric relief along the continental slope off the Pacific Border is the major source of scattering in the western United States. On the other hand, sedimentary basins, especially their margins, are the dominant scatterers in the central United States. Moho offsets, such as the one around the periphery of the Colorado Plateau, are also a strong contributor to scattering, but isolating their effect from that of other near‐surface structures without any additional constraints can be complicated. Finally, we demonstrate the possibility of using scattered surface waves to constrain subsurface velocity structures, as complementary to conventional earthquake‐ or ambient noise‐based surface wave tomography.
more »
« less
Crustal Composition and Moho Variations of the Central and Eastern United States: Improving Resolution and Geologic Interpretation of EarthScope USArray Seismic Images Using Gravity
Abstract EarthScope's USArray Transportable Array has shortcomings for the purpose of interpreting geologic features of wavelengths less than the Transportable Array station spacing, but these can be overcome by using higher spatial resolution gravity data. In this study, we exploit USArray receiver functions to reduce nonuniqueness in the interpretation of gravity anomalies. We model gravity anomalies from previously derived density variations of sedimentary basins, crustalVp/Vsvariation, Moho variation, and upper mantle density variation derived from body wave imaging informed by surface wave tomography to estimateVp/Vs. Although average densities and density contrasts for these seismic variations can be derived, the gravity anomalies modeled from them do not explain the entire observed gravity anomaly field in the United States. We use the unmodeled gravity anomalies (residuals) to reconstruct local variations in densities of the crust associated with geologic sources. The approach uses velocity‐density relationships and differs from density computations that assume isostatic compensation. These intracrustal densities identify geologic sources not sampled by and, in some cases, aliased by the USArray station spacing. We show an example of this improvement in the vicinity of the Bloomfield Pluton, north of the bootheel of Missouri, in the central United States.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1246921
- PAR ID:
- 10450052
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Volume:
- 125
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 2169-9313
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Comprehensive observations of surface wave anisotropy across Alaska and the Aleutian subduction zone would help to improve understanding of its tectonics, mantle dynamics, and earthquake risk. We produce such observations, using stations from the USArray Transportable Array, regional networks across Alaska, and the Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment in the Alaska‐Aleutian subduction zone both onshore and offshore. Our data include Rayleigh and Love wave phase dispersion from earthquakes (28–85 s) and ambient noise two‐ and three‐station interferometry (8–50 s). Compared with using two‐station interferometry alone, three‐station interferometry significantly improves the signal‐to‐noise ratio and approximately doubles the number of measurements retained. Average differences between both isotropic and anisotropic tomographic maps constructed from different methods lie within their uncertainties, which is justification for combining the measurements. The composite tomographic maps include Rayleigh wave isotropy and azimuthal anisotropy from 8 to 85 s both onshore and offshore, and onshore Love wave isotropy from 8 to 80 s. In the Alaska‐Aleutian subduction zone, Rayleigh wave fast directions vary from trench parallel to perpendicular and back to parallel with increasing periods, apparently reflecting the effect of the subducted Pacific Plate. The tomographic maps provide a basis for inferring the 3‐D anisotropic crustal and uppermost mantle structure across Alaska and the Aleutian subduction zone.more » « less
-
Abstract One of the main sources of seismic noise below 0.05 Hz is the atmospheric pressure variation, especially when surface pressure variations are large. When surface broadband seismic stations are equipped with pressure sensors, there is high coherence between pressure and seismic signals at low frequencies. The amount of ground deformation under surface pressure variations reflects the characteristics of near‐surface elastic structure and allows us to estimate near‐surface shear‐modulus structure using an inversion method. In the inversion method, we have the surface observable η(f) = Sz/Sp, where f is a frequency between 0.01 and 0.05 Hz, and Sz and Sp are the power spectral densities of vertical seismic data and of surface pressure data. We derive depth sensitivity kernels for η(f) with which we invert for elastic moduli of the shallow structure. Between 0.01 and 0.05 Hz, sensitivity kernels typically have peaks at depths within the uppermost 100 m. Based on vertically heterogeneous 1‐D structures, we estimate Vs30 at 744 USArray Transportable Array stations. Vs30 is the time‐averaged shear‐wave velocity from the surface to the 30‐m depth. We compare our results with various surficial geology maps. Although Vs30 has high horizontal variability over a short distance on the scale of hundreds of meters, we find correlations between Vs30 and large‐scale geological structures, such as mapped units and surficial materials. We find good agreement between estimated Vs30 and mapped Quaternary sediment depths, where stations with thicker underlying sediment tend to have slower Vs30.more » « less
-
Abstract Quasi‐random vertical displacement fluctuations, caused by the spectrum of non‐breaking gravity waves, mix the atmosphere, similar to turbulence, which induces significant vertical transport of heat and constituents in the upper atmosphere. Multi‐decade observations of temperature, made between 85 and 100 km with a Na lidar at Colorado State University (CSU, 40.6°N, 105.1°W), are used to derive the seasonal variations of the wave‐induced thermal (KH) and constituent (KWave) diffusivities. Both show strong annual oscillations with maxima in winter, which increase with increasing altitude.KHandKWaveexhibit summer minima of ∼40 and ∼70 m2s−1, respectively, that are approximately constant with altitude. In winter,KHvaries from ∼50 at 85 to ∼180 m2s−1at 100 km, whileKWavevaries from ∼110 at 85 to ∼340 m2s−1at 100 km. These values are much larger than the eddy diffusivity (Kzz∼ 35 m2s−1) predicted for this site by the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model. The CSU diffusivities are comparable to similar measurements made at other mid‐latitude mountain sites in both hemispheres, and derived from global observations of atomic O. However, the seasonal variations differ from the O observations, which may reflect differences in wave sources at these sites and the different approaches employed to derive the wave diffusivities. Even so, the CSU results demonstrate that heat and constituent transport by unresolved, non‐breaking gravity waves are important processes that need to be incorporated in global chemistry models to properly characterize the thermal and constituent structure of the upper atmosphere.more » « less
-
Abstract Gravity waves impacting ice shelves illicit a suite of responses that can affect ice shelf integrity. Broadband seismometers deployed on the Ross Ice Shelf, complemented by a near‐icefront seafloor hydrophone, establish the association of strong icequake activity with ocean gravity wave amplitudes (AG) below 0.04 Hz. The Ross Ice Shelf‐front seismic vertical displacement amplitudes (ASV) are well correlated withAG, allowing estimating the frequency‐dependent transfer function from gravity wave amplitude to icefront vertical displacement amplitude (TGSV(f)).TGSV(f) is 0.6–0.7 at 0.001–0.01 Hz but decreases rapidly at higher frequencies. Seismicity of strong icequakes exhibits spatial and seasonal associations with different gravity wave frequency bands, with the strongest icequakes observed at the icefront primarily during the austral summer when sea ice is minimal and swell impacts are strongest.more » « less
