skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Surface Wave Isotropic and Azimuthally Anisotropic Dispersion Across Alaska and the Alaska‐Aleutian Subduction Zone
Abstract Comprehensive observations of surface wave anisotropy across Alaska and the Aleutian subduction zone would help to improve understanding of its tectonics, mantle dynamics, and earthquake risk. We produce such observations, using stations from the USArray Transportable Array, regional networks across Alaska, and the Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment in the Alaska‐Aleutian subduction zone both onshore and offshore. Our data include Rayleigh and Love wave phase dispersion from earthquakes (28–85 s) and ambient noise two‐ and three‐station interferometry (8–50 s). Compared with using two‐station interferometry alone, three‐station interferometry significantly improves the signal‐to‐noise ratio and approximately doubles the number of measurements retained. Average differences between both isotropic and anisotropic tomographic maps constructed from different methods lie within their uncertainties, which is justification for combining the measurements. The composite tomographic maps include Rayleigh wave isotropy and azimuthal anisotropy from 8 to 85 s both onshore and offshore, and onshore Love wave isotropy from 8 to 80 s. In the Alaska‐Aleutian subduction zone, Rayleigh wave fast directions vary from trench parallel to perpendicular and back to parallel with increasing periods, apparently reflecting the effect of the subducted Pacific Plate. The tomographic maps provide a basis for inferring the 3‐D anisotropic crustal and uppermost mantle structure across Alaska and the Aleutian subduction zone.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1928395 1952209
PAR ID:
10382502
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Volume:
127
Issue:
11
ISSN:
2169-9313
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract We estimate depth‐dependent azimuthal anisotropy and shear wave velocity structure beneath the Alaska subduction zone by the inversion of a new Rayleigh wave dispersion dataset from 8 to 85 s period. We present a layered azimuthal anisotropy model from the forearc region offshore to the subduction zone onshore. In the forearc crust, we find a trench‐parallel pattern in the Semidi and Kodiak segments, while a trench‐oblique pattern is observed in the Shumagins segment. These fast directions agree well with the orientations of local faults. Within the subducted slab, a dichotomous pattern of anisotropy fast axes is observed along the trench, which is consistent with the orientation of fossil anisotropy generated at the mid‐ocean ridges of the Pacific‐Vancouver and Kula‐Pacific plates that is preserved during subduction. Beneath the subducted slab, a trench‐parallel pattern is observed near the trench, which may indicate the direction of mantle flow. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract This study presents an azimuthally anisotropic shear wave velocity model of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath Alaska, based on Rayleigh wave phase speed observations from 10 to 80 s period recorded at more than 500 broadband stations. We test the hypothesis that a model composed of two homogeneous layers of anisotropy can explain these measurements. This “Two‐Layer Model” confines azimuthal anisotropy to the brittle upper crust along with the uppermost mantle from the Moho to 200 km depth. This model passes the hypothesis test for most of the region of study, from which we draw two conclusions. (a) The data are consistent with crustal azimuthal anisotropy being dominantly controlled by deformationally aligned cracks and fractures in the upper crust undergoing brittle deformation. (b) The data are also consistent with the uppermost mantle beneath Alaska and surroundings experiencing vertically coherent deformation. The model resolves several prominent features. (1) In the upper crust, fast directions are principally aligned with the orientation of major faults. (2) In the upper mantle, fast directions are aligned with the compressional direction in compressional tectonic domains and with the tensional direction in tensional domains. (3) The mantle fast directions located near the Alaska‐Aleutian subduction zone and the surrounding back‐arc area form a toroidal pattern that is consistent with mantle flow directions predicted by recent geodynamical models. Finally, the mantle anisotropy is remarkably consistent with SKS fast directions, but to fit SKS split times, anisotropy must extend below 200 km depth across most of the study region. 
    more » « less
  3. SUMMARY The Alaska–Aleutian subduction zone represents an ideal location to study dynamics within a mantle wedge. The subduction system spans several thousand kilometres, is characterized by a slab edge, and has ample seismicity. Additionally, the majority of islands along the arc house broad-band seismic instruments. We examine shear wave splitting of local-S phases originating along the length of the subduction zone. We have dense measurement spacing in two regions, the central Aleutians and beneath Alaska. Beneath Alaska, we observe a rotation in fast splitting directions near the edge of the subducting slab. Fast directions change from roughly trench perpendicular away from the slab edge to trench parallel near the boundary. This is indicative of toroidal flow around the edge of the subducting Alaska slab. In the central Aleutians, local-S splitting is primarily oriented parallel to, or oblique to, the strike of the trench. The local-S measurements, however, exhibit a depth dependence where deeper events show more consistently trench-parallel directions indicating prevalent trench-parallel mantle flow. Our local-S shear wave splitting results suggest trench-parallel orientation are likely present along much of the subduction zone excited by the slab edge, but that additional complexities exist along strike. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Shear‐wave splitting observations can provide insight into mantle flow, due to the link between the deformation of mantle rocks and their direction‐dependent seismic wave velocities. We identify anisotropy in the Cook Inlet segment of the Alaska subduction zone by analyzing splitting parameters of S waves from local intraslab earthquakes between 50 and 200 km depths, recorded from 2015–2017 and emphasizing stations from the Southern Alaska Lithosphere and Mantle Observation Network experiment. We classify 678 high‐quality local shear‐wave splitting observations into four regions, from northwest to southeast: (L1b) splitting measurements parallel to Pacific plate motion, (L1a) arc‐perpendicular splitting pattern, (L2) sharp transition to arc‐parallel splitting, and (L3) splitting parallel to Pacific plate motion. Forward modeling of splitting from various mantle fabrics shows that no one simple model fully explains the observed splitting patterns. An A‐type olivine fabric with fast direction dipping 45° to the northwest (300°)—aligned with the dipping slab—predicts fast directions that fit L1a observations well, but not L2. The inability of the forward model fabrics to fit all the observed splitting patterns suggests that the anisotropy variations are not due to variable ray angles, but require distinct differences in the anisotropy regime below the arc, forearc, and subducting plate. 
    more » « less
  5. Summary For a weakly anisotropic medium, Rayleigh and Love wave phase speeds at angular frequency ω and propagation azimuth ψ are given approximately by V(ω, ψ) = A0 + A2ccos 2ψ + A2ssin 2ψ + A4ccos 4ψ + A4ssin 4ψ. Earlier theories of the propagation of surface waves in anisotropic media based on non-degenerate perturbation theory predict that the dominant components are expected to be 2ψ for Rayleigh waves and 4ψ for Love waves. This paper is motivated by recent observations of the the 2ψ component for Love waves and 4ψ for Rayleigh waves, referred to here as “unexpected anisotropy”. To explain these observations, we present a quasi-degenerate theory of Rayleigh-Love coupling in a weakly anisotropic medium based on Hamilton’s Principle in Cartesian coordinates, benchmarking this theory with numerical results based on SPECFEM3D. We show that unexpected anisotropy is expected to be present when Rayleigh-Love coupling is strong and recent observations of Rayleigh and Love wave 2ψ and 4ψ anisotropy can be fit successfully with physically plausible models of a depth-dependent tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) medium. In addition, when observations of the 2ψ and 4ψ components of Rayleigh and Love anisotropy are used in the inversion, the ellipticity parameter ηX, introduced here, is better constrained, we can constrain the absolute dip direction based on polarization measurements, and we provide evidence that the mantle should be modeled as a tilted orthorhombic medium rather than a TTI medium. Ignoring observations of unexpected anisotropy may bias the estimated seismic model significantly. We also provide information about the polarization of the quasi-Love waves and coupling between fundamental mode Love and overtone Rayleigh waves in both continental and oceanic settings. The theory of SV-SH coupling for horizontally propagating body waves is presented for comparison with the surface wave theory, with emphasis on results for a TTI medium. 
    more » « less