Forecast informed reservoir operations (FIRO) is an important advance in water management, but the design and testing of FIRO policies is limited by relatively short (10–35 year) hydro‐meteorological hindcasts. We present a novel, multisite model for synthetic forecast ensembles to overcome this limitation. This model utilizes parametric and non‐parametric procedures to capture complex forecast errors and maintain correlation between variables, lead times, locations, and ensemble members. After being fit to data from the hindcast period, this model can generate synthetic forecast ensembles in any period with observations. We demonstrate the approach in a case study of the FIRO‐based Ensemble Forecast Operations (EFO) control policy for the Lake Mendocino—Russian River basin, which conditions release decisions on ensemble forecasts from the Hydrologic Ensemble Forecast System (HEFS). We explore two generation strategies: (a) simulation of synthetic forecasts of meteorology to force HEFS; and (b) simulation of synthetic HEFS streamflow forecasts directly. We evaluate the synthetic forecasts using ensemble verification techniques and event‐based validation, finding good agreement with the actual ensemble forecasts. We then evaluate EFO policy performance using synthetic and actual forecasts over the hindcast period (1985–2010) and synthetic forecasts only over the pre‐hindcast period (1948–1984). Results show that the synthetic forecasts highlight important failure modes of the EFO policy under plausible forecast ensembles, but improvements are still needed to fully capture FIRO policy behavior under the actual forecast ensembles. Overall, the methodology advances a novel way to test FIRO policy robustness, which is key to building institutional support for FIRO.
AA-forecast: anomaly-aware forecast for extreme events
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
-
We introduce a simple multiplicative model to describe the temporal behavior and the ultimate outcome of an epidemic. Our model accounts, in a minimalist way, for the competing influences of imposing public-health restrictions when the epidemic is severe, and relaxing restrictions when the epidemic is waning. Our primary results are that different instances of an epidemic with identical starting points have disparate outcomes and each epidemic temporal history is strongly fluctuating.more » « less
-
It is often reported in the forecast combination literature that a simple average of candidate forecasts is more robust than sophisticated combining methods. This phenomenon is usually referred to as the “forecast combination puzzle”. Motivated by this puzzle, we explore its possible explanations, including high variance in estimating the target optimal weights (estimation error), invalid weighting formulas, and model/candidate screening before combination. We show that the existing understanding of the puzzle should be complemented by the distinction of different forecast combination scenarios known as combining for adaptation and combining for improvement. Applying combining methods without considering the underlying scenario can itself cause the puzzle. Based on our new understandings, both simulations and real data evaluations are conducted to illustrate the causes of the puzzle. We further propose a multi-level AFTER strategy that can integrate the strengths of different combining methods and adapt intelligently to the underlying scenario. In particular, by treating the simple average as a candidate forecast, the proposed strategy is shown to reduce the heavy cost of estimation error and, to a large extent, mitigate the puzzle.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-023-00919-7
