An official website of the United States government
Abstract Adaptive plasticity is expected to evolve when informative cues predict environmental variation. However, plastic responses can be maladaptive even when those cues are informative, if prediction mistakes are shared across members of a generation. These fitness costs can constrain the evolution of plasticity when initial plastic mutants use of cues of only moderate reliability. Here, we model the barriers to the evolution of plasticity produced by these constraints and show that dispersal across a metapopulation can overcome them. Constraints are also lessened, though not eliminated, when plastic responses are free to evolve gradually and in concert with increased reliability. Each of these factors be viewed as a form of bet-hedging: by lessening correlations in the fates of relatives, dispersal acts as diversifying bet-hedging, while producing submaximal responses to a cue can be understood as a conservative bet-hedging strategy. While poor information may constrain the evolution of plasticity, the opportunity for bet-hedging may predict when that constraint can be overcome. Abstract Populations may make bad predictions when when using partially reliable cues to track changing environments (left). These mistakes can render plasticity deleterious (s < 0); right) when cue reliability is low, but dispersal among demes spreads out the effects of mistakes and allows the evolution of adaptive plasticity.
more »
« less
Coping with seasons: evolutionary dynamics of gene networks in a changing environment
In environments that vary frequently and unpredictably, bet-hedgers can overtake the population. Diversifying bet-hedgers have a diverse set of offspring so that, no matter the conditions they find themselves in, at least some offspring will have high fitness. In contrast, conservative bet-hedgers have a set of offspring that all have an in-between phenotype compared to the specialists. Here, we use an evolutionary algorithm of gene regulatory networks to de novo evolve the two strategies and investigate their relative success in different parameter settings. We found that diversifying bet-hedgers almost always evolved first, but then eventually got outcompeted by conservative bet-hedgers. We argue that even though similar selection pressures apply to the two bet-hedger strategies, conservative bet-hedgers could win due to the robustness of their evolved networks, in contrast to the sensitive networks of the diversifying bet-hedgers. These results reveal an unexplored aspect of the evolution of bet-hedging that could shed more light on the principles of biological adaptation in variable environmental conditions.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2008413
- PAR ID:
- 10458464
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 163 to 166
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The lower female competitiveness often found in economic experiments presents a puzzle. If accumulating wealth and reaching high status affords women essential benefits for themselves and their children, why do women appear less competitive? By looking at behavioural strategies from a cooperative breeding perspective, we propose that women may have evolved an adaptation to strategically suppress competitiveness to elicit cooperation for the benefit of raising offspring. To support this idea, we review the literature that shows that women's behaviour is, in general, more reactive than men's to the social conditions of the different games. In particular, we focus on our experimental work where we show that women are not less competitive than men once the games evoke a parenting frame (by substituting cash with rewards that could benefit the participants' offspring), a gender-typical one (by using vouchers for prizes acceptable as domain of female interests), or include a prosocial option (by allowing winners to share some of the gains with losers). We conclude that, for women, nurturing the potential for cooperation intertwines with competitiveness to produce a complex, adaptive female social strategy. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Cooperation among women: evolutionary and cross-cultural perspectives’.more » « less
-
Abstract Microclimatic conditions change dramatically as forests age and impose strong filters on community assembly during succession. Light availability is the most limiting environmental factor in tropical wet forest succession; by contrast, water availability is predicted to strongly influence tropical dry forest (TDF) successional dynamics. While mechanisms underlying TDF successional trajectories are not well understood, observational studies have demonstrated that TDF communities transition from being dominated by species with conservative traits to species with acquisitive traits, the opposite of tropical wet forest. Determining how functional traits predict TDF tree species’ responses to changing environmental conditions could elucidate mechanisms underlying tree performance during TDF succession. We implemented a 6‐ha restoration experiment on a degraded Vertisol in Costa Rica to determine (1) how TDF tree species with different resource‐use strategies performed along a successional gradient and (2) how ecophysiological functional traits correlated with tree performance in simulated successional stages. We used two management treatments to simulate distinct successional stages including: clearing all remnant vegetation (early‐succession), or interplanting seedlings with no clearing (mid‐succession). We crossed these two management treatments (cleared/interplanted) with two species mixes with different resource‐use strategies (acquisitive/conservative) to examine their interaction. Overall seedling survival after 2 yr was low, 15.1–26.4% in the four resource‐use‐strategy × management‐treatment combinations, and did not differ between the management treatments or resource‐use‐strategy groups. However, seedling growth rates were dramatically higher for all species in the cleared treatment (year 1, 69.1% higher; year 2, 143.3% higher) and defined resource‐use strategies had some capacity to explain seedling performance. Overall, ecophysiological traits were better predictors of species’ growth and survival than resource‐use strategies defined by leaf and stem traits such as specific leaf area. Moreover, ecophysiological traits related to water use had a stronger influence on seedling performance in the cleared, early‐successional treatment, indicating that the influence of microclimatic conditions on tree survival and growth shifts predictably during TDF succession. Our findings suggest that ecophysiological traits should be explicitly considered to understand shifts in TDF functional composition during succession and that using these traits to design species mixes could greatly improve TDF restoration outcomes.more » « less
-
Abstract Parental effects are often considered an evolved response, in which parents transmit information about the environment to enhance offspring fitness. However, these effects need not be adaptive. Here, we provide a striking example by presenting evidence that overfeeding of adult Mexican spadefoot toads, Spea multiplicata, is associated with decreased offspring survival. After a temporary change to their standard feeding regimen, S. multiplicata in our captive colony developed a much higher body condition (i.e. body mass for a given body length) than those in the wild. We analysed data from three subsequent experiments and found that although the body condition of a father was positively correlated with tadpole survival, mothers with a higher condition had lower tadpole survival. Our study highlights how obesity can negatively impact future generations via maladaptive maternal effects. Such effects could be especially likely for animals living in variable environments (such as spadefoots) that have evolved ‘thrifty phenotypes’ that make them prone to obesity. Our study also illustrates how husbandry conditions typically regarded as beneficial might be harmful. Given that captive breeding programmes are increasingly used to combat worldwide amphibian declines, these programmes must consider the ecology and evolutionary history of the focal species to minimize any maladaptive parental effects.more » « less
-
Parental effects are often considered an evolved response, in which parents transmit information about the environment to enhance offspring fitness. However, these effects need not be adaptive. Here, we provide a striking example by presenting evidence that overfeeding of adult Mexican spadefoot toads, Spea multiplicata, is associated with decreased offspring survival. After a temporary change to their standard feeding regimen, S. multiplicata in our captive colony developed a much higher body condition (i.e. body mass for a given body length) than those in the wild. We analysed data from three subsequent experiments and found that although the body condition of a father was positively correlated with tadpole survival, mothers with a higher condition had lower tadpole survival. Our study highlights how obesity can negatively impact future generations via maladaptive maternal effects. Such effects could be especially likely for animals living in variable environments (such as spadefoots) that have evolved ‘thrifty phenotypes’ that make them prone to obesity. Our study also illustrates how husbandry conditions typically regarded as beneficial might be harmful. Given that captive breeding programmes are increasingly used to combat worldwide amphibian declines, these programmes must consider the ecology and evolutionary history of the focal species to minimize any maladaptive parental effects.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3583133.3590744
