An official website of the United States government
Abstract The interrelationships of the extant crocodyliansGavialis gangeticusandTomistoma schlegeliihave been historically disputed. Whereas molecular analyses indicate a sister taxon relationship between these two gavialoid species, morphological datasets typically placeGavialisas the outgroup to all other extant crocodylians. Recent morphological‐based phylogenetic analyses have begun to resolve this discrepancy, recoveringGavialisas the closest living relative ofTomistoma; however, several stratigraphically early fossil taxa are recovered as closer toGavialisthanTomistoma, resulting in anomalously early divergence timings. As such, additional morphological data might be required to resolve these remaining discrepancies. ‘Tomistoma’dowsoniis an extinct species of gavialoid from the Miocene of North Africa. Utilising CT scans of a near‐complete, referred skull, we reconstruct the neuroanatomy and neurosensory apparatus of ‘Tomistoma’dowsoni. Based on qualitative and quantitative morphometric comparisons with other crocodyliforms, the neuroanatomy of ‘Tomistoma’dowsoniis characterised by an intermediate morphology between the two extant gavialoids, more closely resemblingGavialis. This mirrors the results of recent studies based on the external anatomy of these three species and other fossil gavialoids. Several neuroanatomical features of these species appear to reflect ecological and/or phylogenetic signals. For example, the ‘simple’ morphology of their neurosensory apparatus is broadly similar to that of other long and narrow‐snouted (longirostrine), aquatic crocodyliforms. A dorsoventrally short, anteroposteriorly long endosseous labyrinth is also associated with longirostry. These features indicate that snout and skull morphology, which are themselves partly constrained by ecology, exert an influence on neuroanatomical morphology, as has also been recognised in birds and turtles. Conversely, the presence of a pterygoid bulla inGavialisand several extinct gavialoids, and its absence inTomistoma schlegelii, could be interpreted as a phylogenetic signal of crocodylians more closely related toGavialis than toTomistoma. Evaluation of additional fossil gavialoids will be needed to further test whether these and other neuroanatomical features primarily reflect a phylogenetic or ecological signal. By incorporating such previously inaccessible information of extinct and extant gavialoids into phylogenetic and macroecological studies, we can potentially further constrain the clade's interrelationships, as well as evaluate the timing and ecological association of the evolution of these neuroanatomical features. Finally, our study supports recent phylogenetic analyses that place ‘Tomistoma’dowsonias being phylogenetically closer toGavialis gangeticusthan toTomistoma schlegelii, indicating the necessity of a taxonomic revision of this fossil species.
more »
« less
Skull Morphology of the Lizard Ptychoglossus vallensis (Squamata: Alopoglossidae) With Comments on the Variation Within Gymnophthalmoidea
ABSTRACT In recent years, major changes have been proposed for the phylogenetic relationships within the Gymnophthalmoidea, including the description of Alopoglossidae. Recent studies relied primarily on molecular data and have not accounted for evidence from alternative sources, such as morphology. In this study, we provide a detailed bone‐by‐bone description of the skull ofPtychoglossus vallensisand compare this species with other gymnophthalmoideans. The description was based on 10 cleared‐and‐stained specimens, four disarticulated skulls, and computed microtomography data ofP. vallensis. Most recent phylogenetic hypothesis for the Gymnophthalmoidea was used as a framework to compare the skull ofP. vallensiswith other species of the Alopoglossidae, Gymnophthalmidae, and Teiidae. Marked similarities between alopoglossids and gymnophthalmids were observed in contrast to teiids, probably due to convergence generated by miniaturization. We also qualitatively analyzed the kinesis of the skull ofP. vallensisconcluding that is highly akinetic, a trait commonly evolved in fossorial, primarily burrowing squamates. We also describe one unique osteological feature for Alopoglossidae that is not known in any other squamate group. Anat Rec, 302:1074–1092, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1657656
- PAR ID:
- 10461048
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Anatomical Record
- Volume:
- 302
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 1932-8486
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 1074-1092
- Size(s):
- p. 1074-1092
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Bones of the skull are traditionally categorized as derived from either endochondral or intramembranous bone. In our previous work, we have observed the interaction of different tissue types in growth of the skull. We find the dichotomy of intramembranous and endochondral bone to be too restrictive, limiting our interpretation of sources of biological variation. Here, we advocate for the use of the termectochondralbone to describe bone that originates from an endochondral model but is directed in its subsequent growth by membranes and other fascial attachments. Growth of the alisphenoid and orbitosphenoid are described as two examples of ectochondral bone, influenced in their shape primarily by the surrounding soft tissues. Ectochondral bone may be an ideal mechanism for rapidly evolving new phenotypes. Instead of evolving novelties by altering morphology of the cartilage template, novel features may be formed by ectochondral ossification, a more direct and rapid mode of osteogenesis than that of the cartilage template.more » « less
-
Therocephalia are an important clade of non-mammalian therapsids that evolved a diverse array of morphotypes and body sizes throughout their evolutionary history. The postcranial anatomy of therocephalians has largely been overlooked, but remains important towards understanding aspects of their palaeobiology and phylogenetic relationships. Here, we provide the first postcranial description of the large akidnognathid eutherocephalianMoschorhinus kitchingiby examining multiple specimens from fossil collections in South Africa. We also compare the postcranial anatomy with previously described therocephalian postcranial material and provide an updated literature review to ensure a reliable foundation of comparison for future descriptive work.Moschorhinusshares all the postcranial features of eutherocephalians that differentiate them from early-diverging therocephalians, but is differentiated from other eutherocephalian taxa by aspects concerning the scapula, interclavicle, sternum, manus, and femur. The novel anatomical data from this contribution shows thatMoschorhinuspossessed a stocky bauplan with a particularly robust scapula, humerus, and femur. These attributes, coupled with the short and robust skull bearing enlarged conical canines imply thatMoschorhinuswas well equipped to grapple with and subdue prey items. Additionally, the combination of these attributes differ from those of similarly sized coeval gorgonopsians, which would have occupied a similar niche in late Permian ecosystems. Moreover,Moschorhinuswas the only large carnivore known to have survived the Permo-Triassic mass extinction. Thus, the subtle but important postcranial differences may suggest a type of niche partitioning in the predator guild during the Permo-Triassic mass extinction interval.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT Rhadinichthysis one of the most wide-ranging and speciose genera of Palaeozoic actinopterygians. A classic variety of ‘palaeoniscoid’,Rhadinichthysspecies are generally small (~10–15 cm) and known mostly from dermal skeletal remains that show features commonplace among early ray-finned fishes. For this reason, the genus has long been considered a poorly diagnosed wastebasket taxon in need of revision and rarely included in systematic analyses. In the present work, syntypes ofRhadinichthys ornatissimus, the type species, are re-examined and supplemented with better-preserved material from other localities in the Scottish Midland Valley. A neotype is nominated and a more precise diagnosis presented with a suite of genus-level apomorphies. Unexpectedly, these traits are also evident in the monotypic Lower Carboniferous actinopterygian genusWoodichthys, which the neotype ofR. ornatissimusclosely resembles. As a result, the genusWoodichthysis subsumed within the redefinedRhadinichthys, and the singleWoodichthysspecies is reassigned asR. bearsdeni, comb. nov., bringing with it a set of endoskeletal data. Some of these data are new, derived from μCT scans of the skull of theR. bearsdeniholotype, yielding renderings that update the original description of its skull table, parasphenoid, neurocranium, and otoliths. Further new data concerning the hyoid arch are obtained from a new specimen ofR. bearsdenifrom a site close by the original Bearsden locality. Redefined in this way,Rhadinichthyspresents a data-rich operational taxonomic unit better suited for systematic studies. However, in so doing, it also releases a cluster of fossil species no longer anchored to a genus and now in need of rediagnoses.more » « less
-
Abstract Caimaninae is one of the few crocodylian lineages that still has living representatives. Today, most of its six extant species are restricted to South and Central America. However, recent discoveries have revealed a more complex evolutionary history, with a fossil record richer than previously thought and a possible North American origin. Among the oldest caimanines isEocaiman cavernensis, from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina. It was described by George G. Simpson in the 1930s, representing the first caimanine reported for the Palaeogene. Since then,E. cavernensishas been ubiquitous in phylogenetic studies on the group, but a more detailed morphological description and revision of the taxon were lacking. Here, we present a reassessment ofE. cavernensis, based on first‐hand examination and micro‐computed tomography of the holotype, and reinterpret different aspects of its morphology. We explore the phylogenetic affinities ofE. cavernensisand other caimanines using parsimony and Bayesian inference approaches. Our results provide evidence for a monophyleticEocaimangenus within Caimaninae, even though some highly incomplete taxa (including the congenericEocaiman itaboraiensis) represent significant sources of phylogenetic instability. We also foundCulebrasuchus mesoamericanusas sister to all other caimanines and the North American globidontans (i.e.Brachychampsaand closer relatives) outside Caimaninae. A time‐calibrated tree, obtained using a fossilized birth–death model, shows a possible Campanian origin for the group (76.97 ± 6.7 Ma), which is older than the age estimated using molecular data, and suggests that the earliest cladogenetic events of caimanines took place rapidly and across the K–Pg boundary.more » « less
