Actin filament assembly in plants is a dynamic process, requiring the activity of more than 75 actin‐binding proteins. Central to the regulation of filament assembly and stability is the activity of a conserved family of actin‐depolymerizing factors (
The actin‐related protein 2/3 complex (Arp2/3 complex), a key regulator of actin cytoskeletal dynamics, has been linked to multiple cellular processes, including those associated with response to stress. Herein, the
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10461073
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley-Blackwell
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 9
- ISSN:
- 0140-7791
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 2664-2680
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Summary ADF s), whose primarily function is to regulate the severing and depolymerization of actin filaments. In recent years, the activity ofADF proteins has been linked to a variety of cellular processes, including those associated with response to stress. Herein, a wheat gene,ADF Ta was identified and characterized.ADF 4,Ta encodes a 139‐amino‐acid protein containing five F‐actin‐binding sites and two G‐actin‐binding sites, and interacts with wheat (ADF 4Triticum aestivum ) Actin1 (TaACT 1),in planta . Following treatment of wheat, separately, with jasmonic acid, abscisic acid or with the avirulent race,CYR 23, of the stripe rust pathogenPuccinia striiformis f. sp.tritici , we observed a rapid induction in accumulation ofTa ADF 4mRNA . Interestingly, accumulation ofTa ADF 4mRNA was diminished in response to inoculation with a virulent race,CYR 31. Silencing ofTa resulted in enhanced susceptibility toADF 4CYR 23, demonstrating a role forTa in defense signaling. Using a pharmacological‐based approach, coupled with an analysis of host response to pathogen infection, we observed that treatment of plants with the actin‐modifying agent latrunculin B enhanced resistance toADF 4CYR 23, including increased production of reactive oxygen species and enhancement of localized hypersensitive cell death. Taken together, these data support the hypothesis thatTa ADF 4 positively modulates plant immunity in wheat via the modulation of actin cytoskeletal organization. -
Abstract Plant steroid hormones brassinosteroids (
BR s) regulate plant growth and development at many different levels. Recent research has revealed that stress‐responsive NAC (petunia NAM and Arabidopsis ATAF1, ATAF2, and CUC2) transcription factorRD 26 is regulated byBR signaling and antagonizesBES 1 in the interaction between growth and drought stress signaling. However, the upstream signaling transduction components that activateRD 26 during drought are still unknown. Here, we demonstrate that the function ofRD 26 is modulated byGSK 3‐like kinaseBIN 2 and protein phosphatase 2CABI 1. We show thatABI 1, a negative regulator inabscisic acid (ABA) signaling, dephosphorylates and destabilizesBIN 2 to inhibitBIN 2 kinase activity.RD 26 protein is stabilized byABA and dehydration in aBIN 2‐dependent manner.BIN 2 directly interacts and phosphorylatesRD 26in vitro andin vivo .BIN 2 phosphorylation ofRD 26 is required forRD 26 transcriptional activation on drought‐responsive genes.RD 26 overexpression suppressed the brassinazole (BRZ) insensitivity ofBIN 2 triple mutantbin2 bil1 bil2 , andBIN 2 function is required for the drought tolerance ofRD 26 overexpression plants. Taken together, our data suggest a drought signaling mechanism in which drought stress relievesABI 1 inhibition ofBIN 2, allowingBIN 2 activation. Sequentially,BIN 2 phosphorylates and stabilizesRD 26 to promote drought stress response. -
Summary Plants mount coordinated immune responses to defend themselves against pathogens. However, the cellular components required for plant immunity are not fully understood. The jasmonate‐mimicking coronatine (
COR ) toxin produced byPseudomonas syringae pv.tomato (Pst )DC 3000 functions to overcome plant immunity. We previously isolated eight Arabidopsis (scord ) mutants that exhibit increased susceptibility to aCOR ‐deficient mutant ofPst DC 3000. Among them, thescord6 mutant exhibits defects both in stomatal closure response and in restricting bacterial multiplication inside the apoplast. However, the identity of remained elusive.SCORD 6In this study, we aim to identify the
gene.SCORD 6We identified
via next‐generation sequencing and found it to beSCORD 6 (MURUS 1 ), which is involved in the biosynthesis ofMUR 1GDP ‐l ‐fucose.Discovery of
asSCORD 6 led to a series of experiments that revealed a multi‐faceted role ofMUR 1l ‐fucose biosynthesis in stomatal and apoplastic defenses as well as in pattern‐triggered immunity and effector‐triggered immunity, including glycosylation of pattern‐recognition receptors. Furthermore, compromised stomatal and/or apoplastic defenses were observed in mutants of several fucosyltransferases with specific substrates (e.g.O ‐glycan,N ‐glycan or theDELLA transcriptional repressors). Collectively, these results uncover a novel and broad role ofl ‐fucose and protein fucosylation in plant immunity. -
Summary The collaborative non‐self‐recognition model for S‐
RN ase‐based self‐incompatibility predicts that multiple S‐locus F‐box proteins (SLF s) produced by pollen of a givenS ‐haplotype collectively mediate ubiquitination and degradation of all non‐self S‐RN ases, but not self S‐RN ases, in the pollen tube, thereby resulting in cross‐compatible pollination but self‐incompatible pollination. We had previously used pollen extracts containingGFP ‐fused S2‐SLF 1 (SLF 1 with anS 2‐haplotype) ofPetunia inflata for co‐immunoprecipitation (Co‐IP ) and mass spectrometry (MS ), and identified PiCUL 1‐P (a pollen‐specific Cullin1), PiSSK 1 (a pollen‐specific Skp1‐like protein) and PiRBX 1 (a conventional Rbx1) as components of theSCFS 2–SLF 1complex. Using pollen extracts containing PiSSK 1:FLAG :GFP for Co‐IP /MS , we identified two additionalSLF s (SLF 4 andSLF 13) that were assembled intoSCFSLF complexes. As 17 genes (SLF toSLF 1 ) have been identified inSLF 17S 2andS 3pollen, here we examined whether all 17SLF s are assembled into similar complexes and, if so, whether these complexes are unique toSLF s. We modified the previous Co‐IP /MS procedure, including the addition of style extracts from four differentS ‐genotypes to pollen extracts containing PiSSK 1:FLAG :GFP , to perform four separate experiments. The results taken together show that all 17SLF s and anSLF ‐like protein,SLFL ike1 (encoded by anS ‐locus‐linked gene), co‐immunoprecipitated with PiSSK 1:FLAG :GFP . Moreover, of the 179 other F‐box proteins predicted byS 2andS 3pollen transcriptomes, only a pair with 94.9% identity and another pair with 99.7% identity co‐immunoprecipitated with PiSSK 1:FLAG :GFP . These results suggest thatSCFSLF complexes have evolved specifically to function in self‐incompatibility. -
Summary Light signal provides the spatial and temporal information for plants to adapt to the prevailing environmental conditions. Alterations in light quality and quantity can trigger robust changes in global gene expression. In
Arabidopsis thaliana , two groups of key factors regulating those changes in gene expression areCONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS /DEETIOLATED /FUSCA (COP /DET /FUS ) and a subset of basic helix‐loop‐helix transcription factors calledPHYTOCHROME ‐INTERACTING FACTORS (PIF s). Recently, rapid progress has been made in characterizing the E3 ubiquitin ligases for the light‐induced degradation ofPIF 1,PIF 3 andPIF 4; however, the E3 ligase(s) forPIF 5 remains unknown. Here, we show that theCUL 4COP 1–SPA complex is necessary for the red light‐induced degradation ofPIF 5. Furthermore,COP 1 andSPA proteins stabilizePIF 5 in the dark, but promote the ubiquitination and degradation ofPIF 5 in response to red light through the 26S proteasome pathway. Genetic analysis illustrates that overexpression of can partially suppress bothPIF 5cop1‐4 andspaQ seedling de‐etiolation phenotypes under dark and red‐light conditions. In addition, thePIF 5 protein level cycles under both diurnal and constant light conditions, which is also defective in thecop1‐4 andspaQ backgrounds. Bothcop1‐4 andspaQ show defects in diurnal growth pattern. Overexpression of partially restores growth defects inPIF 5cop1‐4 andspaQ under diurnal conditions, suggesting that theCOP 1–SPA complex plays an essential role in photoperiodic hypocotyl growth, partly through regulating thePIF 5 level. Taken together, our data illustrate how theCUL 4COP 1–SPA E3 ligase dynamically controls thePIF 5 level to regulate plant development.