The working classes have been overlooked as a population that could benefit from social-justice-oriented critical public archaeology approaches. The Anthracite Heritage Program sought to address this gap by targeting educational attainment among students in the historically working class, chronically underserved northeastern Pennsylvania region. Public archaeology initiatives to promote interest and knowledge about undergraduate education revealed that the archaeologists’ greatest contribution was our own (class-based) knowledge of the intricacies of university admissions, funding, and life in the United States. In this way, the project ended up serving underserved communities in the ways that they needed help the most: securing the knowledge to attain class mobility.
Millions of people across the world live off-grid not by choice but because they live in rural areas, have low income, and have no political clout. Delivering sustainable energy solutions to such a substantial amount of the world’s population requires more than a technological fix; it requires leveraging the knowledge of underserved populations working together with a transdisciplinary team to find holistically derived solutions. Our original research has resulted in an innovative Convergence Framework integrating the fields of engineering, social sciences, and communication, and is based on working together with communities and other stakeholders to address the challenges posed by delivering clean energy solutions. In this paper, we discuss the evolution of this Framework and illustrate how this Framework is being operationalized in our on-going research project, cocreating hybrid renewable energy systems for off-grid communities in the Brazilian Amazon. The research shows how this Framework can address clean energy transitions, strengthen emerging industries at local level, and foster Global North–South scholarly collaborations. We do so by the integration of social science and engineering and by focusing on community engagement, energy justice, and governance for underserved communities. Further, this solution-driven Framework leads to the emergence of unique approaches that advance scientific knowledge, while at the same time addressing community needs.
more » « less- Award ID(s):
- 2020790
- PAR ID:
- 10467741
- Publisher / Repository:
- PNAS
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Volume:
- 119
- Issue:
- 49
- ISSN:
- 0027-8424
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract -
null (Ed.)Frontline communities of California experience disproportionate social, economic, and environmental injustices, and climate change is exacerbating the root causes of inequity in those areas. Yet, climate adaptation and mitigation strategies often fail to meaningfully address the experience of frontline community stakeholders. Here, we present three challenges, three errors, and three solutions to better integrate frontline communities' needs in climate change research and to create more impactful policies. We base our perspective on our collective firsthand experiences and on scholarship to bridge local knowledge with hydroclimatic research and policymaking. Unawareness of local priorities (Challenge 1) is a consequence of Ignoring local knowledge (Error 1) that can be, in part, resolved with Information exchange and expansion of community-based participatory research (Solution 1). Unequal access to natural resources (Challenge 2) is often due to Top-down decision making (Error 2), but Buffer zones for environmental protection, green areas, air quality, and water security can help achieve environmental justice (Solution 2). Unequal access to public services (Challenge 3) is a historical issue that persists because of System abuse and tokenism (Error 3), and it may be partially resolved with Multi-benefit projects to create socioeconomic and environmental opportunities within frontline communities that include positive externalities for other stakeholders and public service improvements (Solution 3). The path forward in climate change policy decision-making must be grounded in collaboration with frontline community members and practitioners trained in working with vulnerable stakeholders. Addressing co-occurring inequities exacerbated by climate change requires transdisciplinary efforts to identify technical, policy, and engineering solutions.more » « less
-
SPV Lab is developing an innovation model for school-based citizen science that supports a networked approach to community-centered knowledge building. Students and teachers on each SPV Lab campus interact through sharing of data and lab reports, using an online platform to facilitate collaboration at a distance. Students not only learn, but also contribute to scientific knowledge of a new area of engineering research, i.e., agrivoltaics, and to their communities, providing social value through clean energy and food production. Creation of an SPV Lab citizen science network that supports and sustains student and community learning in the area of sustainable food and energy. 10 teachers were trained in 2022 and 10 more teachers were trained in 2023. The reach of these two cohorts is vast as they impact more than 30 students per year each. Conservatively this translated into nearly 1000 K-12 students gaining knowledge in the area of agriPV. The inclusion of the youth population in sustainability science and initiatives is necessary with increasing climate concerns and the push for cleaner energy. Introducing the younger populations to collaborative learning experiences about sustainable energy production is the goal of the Sonoran Photovoltaic Lab (SPV Lab). SPV Lab is a network of students, teachers, scientists, engineers, and community partners encouraging equitable, lasting, sustainable energy transitions. This group is working to increase photovoltaic systems and educate the next generation of energy researchers, knowledgeable citizens, and students to ensure that underserved students in Arizona have equitable opportunities to participate in experiential learning programs to gain a newfound understanding of sustainable systems and their impact on the environment. Members of the SPV Lab work collaboratively to achieve active engineering citizen science for K-12 students in agrivoltaics engineering research. Agrivoltaics is a mixed energy source where solar panels are raised above agricultural crops or livestock. This creates a symbiotic relationship between the photovoltaic panels and the plants or animals that are located underneath. A cooling microbiome is generated beneath the solar panels that reduces the temperature in the area, thereby providing a more hospitable home for plants while increasing panel efficiency while collecting useful energy. Due to the complexity of agriPV systems, students benefit most from working side-by-side with other students, teachers, and experts to reach innovative solutions. This project represents the importance of intergenerational collaboration as the main contributors to this project included a college professor, a college student, and a high school student, all of whom contributed equally to the success of this project. Students participate in the construction of the garden beds, mapping activities, data collection, and more. Through the introduction and implementation of these activities, the students have become more invested in the success of their agrivoltaics system and are eager to support the project. The mapping activity has led to a newly cultivated understanding of These activities promoting the significance of engineering sustainable energy solutions, as well as local food systems and healthy community relationships. In a pre-college resource exchange session, SPV Lab teachers and engineering education researchers, and at least one student representative, will co-present to represent our SPV Lab network. The team will share knowledge, resources, practices, and protocols that support SPV Lab students to (a) conduct community ethnography to inform crop choices, (b) collect data in the garden using simple digital tools and time series monitoring systems, (c) analyze and interpret data from their own gardens, and (d) share lab reports and analyze data across multiple campuses. Attendees will learn how to design and build agriPV garden spaces, build a network of collaborators, and conduct citizen science in their own regions.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Moving toward a sustainable global society requires substantial change in both social and technological systems. This sustainability is dependent not only on addressing the environmental impacts of current social and technological systems, but also on addressing the social, economic and political harms that continue to be perpetuated through systematic forms of oppression and the exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) communities. To adequately identify and address these harms, we argue that scientists, practitioners, and communities need a transdisciplinary framework that integrates multiple types of knowledge, in particular, Indigenous and experiential knowledge. Indigenous knowledge systems embrace relationality and reciprocity rather than extraction and oppression, and experiential knowledge grounds transition priorities in lived experiences rather than expert assessments. Here, we demonstrate how an Indigenous, experiential, and community-based participatory framework for understanding and advancing socio-technological system transitions can facilitate the co-design and co-development of community-owned energy systems.more » « less
-
Abstract Disasters can have devastating impacts on communities particularly when they are disproportionately impacted by flooding. Despite the presence of governmental programs implemented to increase community preparedness for flooding, communities may still struggle. Currently, we have limited holistic knowledge of barriers that stifle community preparedness. To address this gap, we conducted 32 in‐depth interviews with stakeholders including community members, leaders, and city employees in a community subject to flood risk. The findings suggest that preparedness is not overcome simply by providing knowledge, and people do not necessarily embrace preparedness after participating in training programs. Rather, community preparedness is entwined with addressing chronic stressors, increasing community participation, and attending to social justice and broken trust due to historical mistreatment of the community. We hereby introduce the notion of community preparedness efficacy—defined as the barriers needed to be overcome for communities to be able to prepare for disasters—that considers chronic stressors, community participation, social justice, and equity to move underserved communities forward.