An official website of the United States government
Abstract Measurements by the submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer (SUNA) can be used to derive high‐resolution in situ nitrate concentration with reliable accuracy and precision. Here we report our operational practices for SUNA deployment (including pre‐cruise instrument preparation and in‐cruise instrument maintenance) and detailed post‐cruise nitrate quality control procedures for SUNA integrated onto the CTD rosette. This work is based on experiences and findings from over 500 individual SUNA casts collected from 24 cruises (of which 14 cruises have been quality controlled so far) over the past 5 yr. After applying previously published spectral corrections for temperature, salinity, and pressure effects, we found residual biases in SUNA nitrate estimates compared to independently measured discrete samples. We further develop and assess a new two‐step procedure to remove remaining biases: (1) a general temperature‐dependent adjustment at low‐nitrate concentrations; and (2) a cruise‐specific full‐range bias correction. Our final quality‐controlled SUNA nitrate data achieve an accuracy of 0.34–0.78 μM, with a precision of 0.08–0.21 μM, at a vertical resolution of 1 m. Additional comparisons between the nitrate and density data confirm the high quality of the quality‐controlled SUNA data. Although applying spectral correction algorithms increases the accuracy and precision of the instrument‐output nitrate concentration, we emphasize that additional constraints of SUNA measurements against other independent sources (e.g., bottle data, temperature, and density) are irreplaceable to ensure the accuracy of final nitrate data.
more »
« less
Updated temperature correction for computing seawater nitrate with in situ ultraviolet spectrophotometer and submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer nitrate sensors
Abstract Sensors that use ultraviolet (UV) light absorption to measure nitrate in seawater at in situ temperatures require a correction to the calibration coefficients if the calibration and sample temperatures are not identical. This is mostly due to the bromide molecule, which absorbs more UV light as temperature increases. The current correction applied to in situ ultraviolet spectrophotometer (ISUS) and submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer (SUNA) nitrate sensors generally follows Sakamoto et al. (2009, Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 7, 132–143). For waters warmer than the calibration temperature, this correction model can lead to a 1–2 μmol kg−1positive bias in nitrate concentration. Here we present an updated correction model, which reduces this small but noticeable bias by at least 50%. This improved model is based on additional laboratory data and describes the temperature correction as an exponential function of wavelength and temperature difference from the calibration temperature. It is a better fit to the experimental data than the current model and the improvement is validated using two populations of nitrate profiles from Biogeochemical Argo floats navigating through tropical waters. One population is from floats equipped with ISUS sensors while the other arises from floats with SUNA sensors on board. Although this model can be applied to both ISUS and SUNA nitrate sensors, it should not be used for OPUS UV nitrate sensors at this time. This new approach is similar to that used for OPUS sensors (Nehir et al., 2021, Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 663800) with differing model coefficients. This difference suggests that there is an instrumental component to the temperature correction or that there are slight differences in experimental methodologies.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10469412
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 10
- ISSN:
- 1541-5856
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 581-593
- Size(s):
- p. 581-593
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) deployed both the In-Situ Ultraviolet Spectrophotometer (ISUS) and Submersible Underwater Nitrate Sensor (SUNA) for continuous, in-situ measurement of nitrate. At the Pioneer-New England Shelf Array (Pioneer-NES), ISUS/SUNA sensors were deployed at 7-meters depth at the Inshore (ISSM), Central (CNSM), and Offshore (OSSM) Surface Mooring locations. The SUNA sensor replaced the ISUS sensors spring 2018. The SUNA was a major improvement in technology, with significant improvements in accuracy and precision. However, it still suffers from calibration drift due to lamp fatigue and biofouling as well as spectral interference due to bromide and fluorometric CDOM. Drift is corrected by application of post-cruise calibrations to recalculate the temperature-and-salinity corrected nitrate concentration following Sakamoto (2009a) and estimating a linear drift between pre-and-post cruise deployments. Validation is performed by comparison with discrete water samples collected during deployment/recovery of the sensors. These datasets include the nitrate data from the Pioneer-NES ISSM (CP03ISSM-RID26-07-NUTNRB000.nc), CNSM (CP01CNSM-RID26-07-NUTNRB000.nc), and OSSM (CP04OSSM-RID26-07-NUTNRB000.nc) SUNA instruments spanning Spring 2018 through Fall 2022. Each dataset contains the measured nitrate, the temperature-salinity corrected nitrate, the drift-corrected nitrate, and the nitrate following validation with bottle samples.more » « less
-
This dataset contains high-quality high-resolution nitrate data collected from a submersible ultraviolet nitrate analyzer (SUNA) mounted on the CTD rosette. Both raw and bias-corrected, quality-controlled data are included. The raw data include the instrument's estimate of nitrate concentration with dark values and light intensity at 256 wavelengths. Our quality-controlled SUNA nitrate data have an accuracy of 0.34-0.78 micromoles per liter, with a precision of 0.08-0.21 micromoles per liter, at a vertical resolution of 1 m. These data are collected from about 21 routinely occupied stations along a cross-shelf transect spanning southward from Martha's Vineyard, MA to just beyond the shelf break onboard the seasonal Northeast U.S. Shelf Long-Term Ecological Research (NES-LTER) survey cruises since February 2019. Data in CSV format.more » « less
-
The Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations and Modeling (SOCCOM) project has deployed 194 profiling floats equipped with biogeochemical (BGC) sensors, making it one of the largest contributors to global BGC-Argo. Post-deployment quality control (QC) of float-based oxygen, nitrate, and pH data is a crucial step in the processing and dissemination of such data, as in situ chemical sensors remain in early stages of development. In situ calibration of chemical sensors on profiling floats using atmospheric reanalysis and empirical algorithms can bring accuracy to within 3 μmol O 2 kg –1 , 0.5 μmol NO 3 – kg –1 , and 0.007 pH units. Routine QC efforts utilizing these methods can be conducted manually through visual inspection of data to assess sensor drifts and offsets, but more automated processes are preferred to support the growing number of BGC floats and reduce subjectivity among delayed-mode operators. Here we present a methodology and accompanying software designed to easily visualize float data against select reference datasets and assess QC adjustments within a quantitative framework. The software is intended for global use and has been used successfully in the post-deployment calibration and QC of over 250 BGC floats, including all floats within the SOCCOM array. Results from validation of the proposed methodology are also presented which help to verify the quality of the data adjustments through time.more » « less
-
Abstract Profiles of oxygen measurements from Argo profiling floats now vastly outnumber shipboard profiles. To correct for drift, float oxygen data are often initially adjusted to deployment casts, ship‐based climatologies, or, recently, measurements of atmospheric oxygen for in situ calibration. Air calibration enables accurate measurements in the upper ocean but may not provide similar accuracy at depth. Using a quality controlled shipboard data set, we find that the entire Argo oxygen data set is offset relative to shipboard measurements (float minus ship) at pressures of 1,450–2,000 db by a median of −1.9 μmol kg−1(mean ± SD of −1.9 ± 3.9, 95% confidence interval around the mean of {−2.2, −1.6}) and air‐calibrated floats are offset by −2.7 μmol kg−1(−3.0 ± 3.4 (CI95%{−3.7, −2.4}). The difference between float and shipboard oxygen is likely due to offsets in the float oxygen data and not oxygen changes at depth or biases in the shipboard data set. In addition to complicating the calculation of long‐term ocean oxygen changes, these float oxygen offsets impact the adjustment of float nitrate and pH measurements, therefore biasing important derived quantities such as the partial pressure of CO2(pCO2) and dissolved inorganic carbon. Correcting floats with air‐calibrated oxygen sensors for the float‐ship oxygen offsets alters float pH by a median of 3.0 mpH (3.1 ± 3.7) and float‐derived surfacepCO2by −3.2 μatm (−3.2 ± 3.9). This adjustment to floatpCO2represents half, or more, of the bias in float‐derivedpCO2reported in studies comparing floatpCO2to shipboardpCO2measurements.more » « less
