skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Assessing large-scale mantle compositional heterogeneity from machine learning analysis of 28 global P - and S -wave tomography models
Title: Assessing large-scale mantle compositional heterogeneity from machine learning analysis of 28 global P - and S -wave tomography models
SUMMARY Differences between P- and S-wave models have been frequently used as evidence for the presence of large-scale compositional heterogeneity in the Earth's mantle. Our two-step machine learning (ML) analysis of 28 P- and S-wave global tomographic models reveals that, on a global scale, such differences are for the most part not intrinsic and could be reduced by changing the models in their respective null spaces. In other words, P- and S-wave images of mantle structure are not necessarily distinct from each other. Thus, a purely thermal explanation for large-scale seismic structure is sufficient at present; significant mantle compositional heterogeneities do not need to be invoked. We analyse 28 widely used tomographic models based on various theoretical approximations ranging from ray theory (e.g. UU-P07 and MIT-P08), Born scattering (e.g. DETOX) and full-waveform techniques (e.g. CSEM and GLAD). We apply Varimax principal component analysis to reduce tomography model dimensionality by 83 percent, while preserving relevant information (94 percent of the original variance), followed by hierarchical clustering (HC) analysis using Ward's method to quantitatively categorize all models into hierarchical groups based on similarities. We found two main tomography model clusters: Cluster 1, which we called ‘Pure P wave’, is composed of six P-wave models that only use longitudinal body wave phases (e.g. P, PP and Pdiff); and Cluster 2, which we called ‘Mixed’, includes both P- and S-wave models. P-wave models in the ‘Mixed’ cluster use inversion methods that include inputs from other geophysical and geological data sources, and this causes them to be more similar to S-wave models than Pure P-wave models without significant loss of fitness to P-wave data. Given that inclusion of new data classes and seismic phases in more recent tomographic models significantly changes imaged seismic structure, our ML assessment of global tomography model similarity may improve selection of appropriate P- and S-wave models for future global tomography comparative studies.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1848327 2422671
PAR ID:
10470739
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Oxford University Press
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Geophysical Journal International
Volume:
235
Issue:
3
ISSN:
0956-540X
Format(s):
Medium: X Size: p. 2778-2793
Size(s):
p. 2778-2793
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences)
    null (Ed.)
    Seismology provides important constraints on the structure and dynamics of the deep mantle. Computational and methodological advances in the past two decades improved tomographic imaging of the mantle and revealed the fine-scale structure of plumes ascending from the core-mantle boundary region and slabs of oceanic lithosphere sinking into the lower mantle. We discuss the modeling aspects of global tomography including theoretical approximations, data selection, and model fidelity and resolution. Using spectral, principal component, and cluster analyses, we highlight the robust patterns of seismic heterogeneity, which inform us of flow in the mantle, the history of plate motions, and potential compositionally distinct reservoirs. In closing, we emphasize that data mining of vast collections of seismic waveforms and new data from distributed acoustic sensing, autonomous hydrophones, ocean-bottom seismometers, and correlation-based techniques will boost the development of the next generation of global models of density, seismic velocity, and attenuation. ▪  Seismic tomography reveals the 100-km to 1,000-km scale variation of seismic velocity heterogeneity in the mantle. ▪  Tomographic images are the most important geophysical constraints on mantle circulation and evolution. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, Geophysical Journal International)
    SUMMARY Despite progress in tomographic imaging of Earth's interior, a number of critical questions regarding the large-scale structure and dynamics of the mantle remain outstanding. One of those questions is the impact of phase-boundary undulations on global imaging of mantle heterogeneity and on geodynamic (i.e. convection-related) observables. To address this issue, we developed a joint seismic-geodynamic-mineral physical tomographic inversion procedure that incorporates lateral variations in the depths of the 410- and 660-km discontinuities. This inversion includes S-wave traveltimes, SS precursors that are sensitive to transition-zone topography, geodynamic observables/data (free-air gravity, dynamic surface topography, horizontal divergence of tectonic plates and excess core-mantle boundary ellipticity) and mineral physical constraints on thermal heterogeneity. Compared to joint tomography models that do not include data sensitivity to phase-boundary undulations in the transition zone, the inclusion of 410- and 660-km topography strongly influences the inference of volumetric anomalies in a depth interval that encompasses the transition zone and mid-mantle. It is notable that joint tomography inversions, which include constraints on transition-zone discontinuity topography by seismic and geodynamic data, yield more pronounced density anomalies associated with subduction zones and hotspots. We also find that the inclusion of 410- and 660-km topography may improve the fit to the geodynamic observables, depending on the weights applied to seismic and geodynamic data in the inversions. As a consequence, we find that the amplitude of non-thermal density anomalies required to explain the geodynamic data decreases in most of the mantle. These findings underline the sensitivity of the joint inversions to the inclusion of transition-zone complexity (e.g. phase-boundary topography) and the implications for the inferred non-thermal density anomalies in these depth regions. Finally, we underline that our inferences of 410- and 660-km topography avoid a commonly employed approximation that represents the contribution of volumetric heterogeneity to SS-wave precursor data. Our results suggest that this previously employed correction, based on a priori estimates of upper-mantle heterogeneity, might be a significant source of error in estimating the 410- and 660-km topography. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, Geophysical Research Letters)
    Abstract Seismic tomography has demonstrated that the shear‐wave velocity is relatively high over a 3,000‐km wide region in the lowermost mantle beneath southern and eastern Asia. This seismic anomaly demarcates the current position of slab remnants that may have subducted in the Cretaceous. To further characterize the seismic structure at smaller scales, we measure 929 residual travel time differences (δt) between the phasesScSandSusing recordings of eight earthquakes beneath the Indian Ocean at stations from the Chinese Digital Seismic Network. We interpret variations of δtup to 10 s as due to horizontal shear‐velocity variations in D″ beneath northern India, Nepal, and southwestern China. The shear velocity can vary by as much as 7% over distances shorter than 300 km. Our observations provide additional observational evidence that compositional heterogeneity and possibly melt contribute to the seismic structure of the lower mantle characterized by long‐term subduction and mantle downwelling. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, Geophysical journal international)
    Despite progress in tomographic imaging of Earth’s interior, a number of critical questions regarding the large-scale structure and dynamics of the mantle remain outstanding. One of those questions is the impact of phase-boundary undulations on global imaging of mantle heterogeneity and on geodynamic (i.e. convection-related) observables. To address this issue, we developed a joint seismic-geodynamic-mineral physical tomographic inversion procedure that incorporates lateral variations in the depths of the 410- and 660-km discontinuities. This inversion includes S-wave traveltimes, SS precursors that are sensitive to transition-zone topography, geodynamic observables/data (free-air gravity, dynamic surface topography, horizontal divergence of tectonic plates and excess core-mantle boundary ellipticity) and mineral physical constraints on thermal heterogeneity. Compared to joint tomography models that do not include data sensitivity to phase-boundary undulations in the transition zone, the inclusion of 410- and 660-km topography strongly influences the inference of volumetric anomalies in a depth interval that encompasses the transition zone and mid-mantle. It is notable that joint tomography inversions, which include constraints on transition-zone discontinuity topography by seismic and geodynamic data, yield more pronounced density anomalies associated with subduction zones and hotspots. We also find that the inclusion of 410- and 660-km topography may improve the fit to the geodynamic observables, depending on the weights applied to seismic and geodynamic data in the inversions. As a consequence, we find that the amplitude of non-thermal density anomalies required to explain the geodynamic data decreases in most of the mantle. These findings underline the sensitivity of the joint inversions to the inclusion of transition-zone complexity (e.g. phase-boundary topography) and the implications for the inferred non-thermal density anomalies in these depth regions. Finally, we underline that our inferences of 410- and 660-km topography avoid a commonly employed approximation that represents the contribution of volumetric heterogeneity to SS-wave precursor data. Our results suggest that this previously employed correction, based on a priori estimates of uppermantle heterogeneity, might be a significant source of error in estimating the 410- and 660-km topography. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; (, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth)
    Abstract Comprehensive observations of surface wave anisotropy across Alaska and the Aleutian subduction zone would help to improve understanding of its tectonics, mantle dynamics, and earthquake risk. We produce such observations, using stations from the USArray Transportable Array, regional networks across Alaska, and the Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment in the Alaska‐Aleutian subduction zone both onshore and offshore. Our data include Rayleigh and Love wave phase dispersion from earthquakes (28–85 s) and ambient noise two‐ and three‐station interferometry (8–50 s). Compared with using two‐station interferometry alone, three‐station interferometry significantly improves the signal‐to‐noise ratio and approximately doubles the number of measurements retained. Average differences between both isotropic and anisotropic tomographic maps constructed from different methods lie within their uncertainties, which is justification for combining the measurements. The composite tomographic maps include Rayleigh wave isotropy and azimuthal anisotropy from 8 to 85 s both onshore and offshore, and onshore Love wave isotropy from 8 to 80 s. In the Alaska‐Aleutian subduction zone, Rayleigh wave fast directions vary from trench parallel to perpendicular and back to parallel with increasing periods, apparently reflecting the effect of the subducted Pacific Plate. The tomographic maps provide a basis for inferring the 3‐D anisotropic crustal and uppermost mantle structure across Alaska and the Aleutian subduction zone. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email