More Like this

1. Current Perceptions And Attitudes of Research And Engineering of Mechanical Engineering (ME) S-STEM Scholars And Regular ME Students

   Jamie Gurganus, Charles Eggleton (October 2019, Biomedical engineering)
2. Beam me up Scotty

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0363-1  

   Forbes, Malcolm D. (November 2019, Nature Chemistry)
3. ‘EXPLORING “ME”CHANICS: THE MULTISCALE MECHANICS OF ME!’ SUMMARY OF OUTREACH LESSONS LEARNED

   Stephany Santos, Hannah Kackley (July 2017, SB3C2017 Summer Biomechanics, Bioengineering and Biotransport Conference June 21 – 24, Tucson, AZ, USA)
4. HX and Me: Understanding Allostery, Folding, and Protein Machines

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-062122-093517  

   Englander, S. Walter (May 2023, Annual Review of Biophysics)

   My accidental encounter with protein hydrogen exchange (HX) at its very beginning and its continued development through my scientific career have led us to a series of advances in HX measurement, interpretation, and cutting edge biophysical applications. After some thoughts about how life brought me there, I take the opportunity to reflect on our early studies of allosteric structure and energy change in hemoglobin, the still-current protein folding problem, and our most recent forward-looking studies on protein machines. 

   more » « less
5. Ask me why, don't tell me why: Asking children for explanations facilitates relational thinking

   https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13274  

   Brockbank, Erik; Lombrozo, Tania; Gopnik, Alison; Walker, Caren M. (May 2022, Developmental Science)

   Abstract Identifying abstract relations is essential for commonsense reasoning. Research suggests that even young children can infer relations such as “same” and “different,” but often fail to apply these concepts. Might the process of explaining facilitate the recognition and application of relational concepts? Based on prior work suggesting that explanation can be a powerful tool to promote abstract reasoning, we predicted that children would be more likely to discover and use an abstract relational rule when they were prompted to explain observations instantiating that rule, compared to when they received demonstration alone. Five‐ and 6‐year‐olds were given a modified Relational Match to Sample (RMTS) task, with repeated demonstrations of relational (same) matches by an adult. Half of the children were prompted to explain these matches; the other half reported the match they observed. Children who were prompted to explain showed immediate, stable success, while those only asked to report the outcome of the pedagogical demonstration did not. Findings provide evidence that explanation facilitates early abstraction over and above demonstration alone. 

   more » « less