Active-source data acquisition included 66 vibroseis and 209 instrumented sledge hammer source locations. Multiple source impacts were recorded at each source location to enable stacking of the recorded signal. The source impacts at each source location have been aligned using cross-correlation, but to provide the most flexibility are provided unstacked (i.e., the signals from each source impact are provided separately). The active-source recordings are provided in terms of both raw, uncorrected units of counts and corrected, engineering units of meters per second. For each source impact, the force output from the vibroseis or instrumented sledge hammer was recorded and is provided in both raw counts and engineering units of kilonewtons. The passive-wavefield data includes 28 hours of ambient noise recorded over two night-time deployments. The passive-wavefield data is provided in raw counts, however, the instrument response files are provided should instrument correction be required in the future. The dataset can be used for active-source and passive-wavefield three-dimensional imaging, as well as other subsurface characterization techniques which include: horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios, multichannel analysis of surface waves, and microtremor array measurements.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on November 10, 2024
Subsurface imaging dataset acquired at the Garner Valley Downhole Array site using a dense network of three-component nodal stations
There is a growing need to characterize the engineering material properties of the shallow subsurface in three dimensions for advanced engineering analyses. However, imaging the near-surface in three dimensions at spatial resolutions required for such purposes remains in its infancy and requires further study before it can be adopted into practice. To enable and accelerate research in this area, we present a large subsurface imaging data set acquired using a dense network of three-component (3C) nodal stations acquired in 2019 at the Garner Valley Downhole Array (GVDA) site. Acquisition of this data set involved the deployment of 196 stations positioned on a 14 × 14 grid with a 5 m spacing. The array was used to acquire active-source data generated by a vibroseis truck and an instrumented sledgehammer, and passive-wavefield data containing ambient noise. The active-source acquisition included 66 vibroseis and 209 instrumented sledgehammer source locations. Multiple source impacts were recorded at each source location to enable stacking of the recorded signals. The active-source recordings are provided in terms of both raw, uncorrected units of counts and corrected engineering units of meters per second. For each source impact, the force output from the vibroseis or instrumented sledgehammer was recorded and is provided in both raw counts and engineering units of kilonewtons. The passive-wavefield data include 28 h of ambient noise recorded over two nighttime deployments. The data set is shown to be useful for active-source and passive-wavefield three-dimensional imaging and other subsurface characterization techniques, which include horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios (HVSRs), multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW), and microtremor array measurements (MAM).
more » « less- Award ID(s):
- 2037900
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10473555
- Publisher / Repository:
- SAGE Publications
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Earthquake Spectra
- Volume:
- 40
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 8755-2930
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 783-802
- Size(s):
- ["p. 783-802"]
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
This is a comprehensive subsurface imaging experiment in Newberry, Florida using stress waves. The site is spatially variable and contains karstic surface and underground voids and anomalies. The sensing technologies used comprised a dense 2D array of 1920 DAS channels and a 12 x 12 grid of 144 SmartSolo 3C nodal stations, which covered an area of 155 m x 75 m and were used to record both active-source and passive-wavefield data. The active-source data was generated by a variety of vibrational and impact sources, namely: a powerful three-dimensional vibroseis shaker truck, a 40-kg propelled energy generator (PEG-40kg), and an 8-lb sledgehammer. The vibroseis shaker truck was used to vibrate the ground in the three directions at 260 locations inside and outside the instrumented area, while the impact sources were used at 268 locations inside the instrumented area. In addition to active source data, four hours of ambient noise were recorded using the DAS, while the nodal stations recorded 48 hours of ambient noise in four 12-hour increments over a period of four days. The waveforms obtained from the 1920 DAS channels for every active-source shot or passive-wavefield time block were extracted, processed, and stored in H5 files. These files can be easily visualized using a Python script incorporated with the open-access dataset. Additionally, the three-component data gathered from each SmartSolo nodal station were consolidated into a single miniSEED file, and the data from all 144 nodal stations obtained during each active-source shot or passive-wavefield time block were extracted and saved into a separate folder. We anticipate that this dataset will be a valuable resource for researchers developing techniques for void and anomaly detection using noninvasive, stress wave-based subsurface imaging techniques.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract Cook Inlet fore‐arc basin in south‐central Alaska is a large, deep (7.6 km) sedimentary basin with the Anchorage metropolitan region on its margins. From 2015 to 2017, a set of 28 broadband seismic stations was deployed in the region as part of the Southern Alaska Lithosphere and Mantle Observation Network (SALMON) project. The SALMON stations, which also cover the remote western portion of Cook Inlet basin and the back‐arc region, form the basis for our observational study of the seismic response of Cook Inlet basin. We quantify the influence of Cook Inlet basin on the seismic wavefield using three data sets: (1) ambient‐noise amplitudes of 18 basin stations relative to a nonbasin reference station, (2) earthquake ground‐motion metrics for 34 crustal and intraslab earthquakes, and (3) spectral ratios (SRs) between basin stations and nonbasin stations for the same earthquakes. For all analyses, we examine how quantities vary with the frequency content of the seismic signal and with the basin depth at each station. Seismic waves from earthquakes and from ambient noise are amplified within Cook Inlet basin. At low frequencies (0.1–0.5 Hz), ambient‐noise ratios and earthquake SRs are in a general agreement with power amplification of 6–14 dB, corresponding to amplitude amplification factors of 2.0–5.0. At high frequencies (0.5–4.0 Hz), the basin amplifies the earthquake wavefield by similar factors. Our results indicate stronger amplification for the deeper basin stations such as near Nikiski on the Kenai Peninsula and weaker amplification near the margins of the basin. Future work devoted to 3D wavefield simulations and treatment of source and propagation effects should improve the characterization of the frequency‐dependent response of Cook Inlet basin to recorded and scenario earthquakes in the region.more » « less
-
more » « less
SUMMARY Non-invasive subsurface imaging using full waveform inversion (FWI) has the potential to fundamentally change near-surface (<30 m) site characterization by enabling the recovery of high-resolution (metre-scale) 2-D/3-D maps of subsurface elastic material properties. Yet, FWI results are quite sensitive to their starting model due to their dependence on local-search optimization techniques and inversion non-uniqueness. Starting model dependence is particularly problematic for near-surface FWI due to the complexity of the recorded seismic wavefield (e.g. dominant surface waves intermixed with body waves) and the potential for significant spatial variability over short distances. In response, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are investigated as a potential tool for developing starting models for near-surface 2-D elastic FWI. Specifically, 100 000 subsurface models were generated to be representative of a classic near-surface geophysics problem; namely, imaging a two-layer, undulating, soil-over-bedrock interface. A CNN has been developed from these synthetic models that is capable of transforming an experimental wavefield acquired using a seismic source located at the centre of a linear array of 24 closely spaced surface sensors directly into a robust starting model for FWI. The CNN approach was able to produce 2-D starting models with seismic image misfits that were significantly less than the misfits from other common starting model approaches, and in many cases even less than the misfits obtained by FWI with inferior starting models. The ability of the CNN to generalize outside its two-layered training set was assessed using a more complex, three-layered, soil-over-bedrock formation. While the predictive ability of the CNN was slightly reduced for this more complex case, it was still able to achieve seismic image and waveform misfits that were comparable to other commonly used starting models, despite not being trained on any three-layered models. As such, CNNs show great potential as tools for rapidly developing robust, site-specific starting models for near-surface elastic FWI.
-
Abstract Non-invasive surface wave methods are increasingly being used as the primary technique for estimating a site’s small-strain shear wave velocity (Vs). Yet, in comparison to invasive methods, non-invasive surface wave methods suffer from highly variable standards of practice, with each company/group/analyst estimating surface wave dispersion data, quantifying its uncertainty (or ignoring it in many cases), and performing inversions to obtain Vs profiles in their own unique manner. In response, this work presents a well-documented, production-tested, and easy-to-adopt workflow for developing estimates of experimental surface wave dispersion data with robust measures of uncertainty. This is a key step required for propagating dispersion uncertainty forward into the estimates of Vs derived from inversion. The paper focuses on the two most common applications of surface wave testing: the first, where only active-source testing has been performed, and the second, where both active-source and passive-wavefield testing has been performed. In both cases, clear guidance is provided on the steps to transform experimentally acquired waveforms into estimates of the site’s surface wave dispersion data and quantify its uncertainty. In particular, changes to surface wave data acquisition and processing are shown to affect the resulting experimental dispersion data, thereby highlighting their importance when quantifying uncertainty. In addition, this work is accompanied by an open-source Python package, swprocess , and associated Jupyter workflows to enable the reader to easily adopt the recommendations presented herein. It is hoped that these recommendations will lead to further discussions about developing standards of practice for surface wave data acquisition, processing, and inversion.more » « less
