An official website of the United States government
Abstract Small, biologically produced, organic molecules called metabolites play key roles in microbial systems where they directly mediate exchanges of nutrients, energy, and information. However, the study of dissolved polar metabolites in seawater and other environmental matrices has been hampered by analytical challenges including high inorganic ion concentrations, low analyte concentrations, and high chemical diversity. Here we show that a cation‐exchange solid‐phase extraction (CX‐SPE) sample preparation approach separates positively charged and zwitterionic metabolites from seawater and freshwater samples, allowing their analysis by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. We successfully extracted 69 known compounds from an in‐house compound collection and evaluated the performance of the method by establishing extraction efficiencies (EEs) and limits of detection (pM to low nM range) for these compounds. CX‐SPE extracted a range of compounds including amino acids and compatible solutes, resulted in very low matrix effects, and performed robustly across large variations in salinity and dissolved organic matter concentration. We compared CX‐SPE to an established SPE procedure (PPL‐SPE) and demonstrate that these two methods extract fundamentally different fractions of the dissolved metabolite pool with CX‐SPE extracting compounds that are on average smaller and more polar. We use CX‐SPE to analyze four environmental samples from distinct aquatic biomes, producing some of the first CX‐SPE dissolved metabolomes. Quantified compounds ranged in concentration from 0.0093 to 49 nM and were composed primarily of amino acids (0.15–16 nM) and compatible solutes such as trimethylamine N‐oxide (0.89–49 nM) and glycine betaine (2.8–5.2 nM).
more »
« less
Matrix effects demystified: Strategies for resolving challenges in analytical separations of complex samples
Matrix effects can significantly impede the accuracy, sensitivity, and reliability of separation techniques presenting a formidable challenge to the analytical process. It is crucial to address matrix effects to achieve accurate and precise measurements in complex matrices. The multifaceted nature of matrix effects which can be influenced by factors such as target analyte, sample preparation protocol, composition, and choice of instrument necessitates a pragmatic approach when analyzing complex matrices. This review aims to highlight common challenges associated with matrix effects throughout the entire analytical process with emphasis on gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry, and sample preparation techniques. These techniques are susceptible to matrix effects that could lead to ion suppression/enhancement or impact the analyte signal at various stages of the analytical workflow. The assessment, quantification, and mitigation of matrix effects are necessary in developing any analytical method. Strategies can be implemented to reduce or eliminate the matrix effect by changing the type of ionization, improving extraction and clean‐up methods, optimization of chromatography conditions, and corrective calibration methods. While development of an effective strategy to completely mitigate matrix effects remains elusive, an integrated approach that combines sample preparation, analytical extraction, and effective instrumental analysis remains the most promising avenue for identifying and resolving matrix effects.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2144591
- PAR ID:
- 10473572
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Separation Science
- Volume:
- 46
- Issue:
- 23
- ISSN:
- 1615-9306
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Nontarget analysis using liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS) is a valuable approach in characterizing for contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in the environment. However, identification of these analytes can be quite costly or taxing without proper analytical standards. To circumvent this problem we utilize Quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRR) models to predict elution order and retention times. Properties calculated from density functional theory (DFT) and the conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) theory are used to produce our QSRR models, which can be calculated for virtually any analyte. We show that this methodology has been successful in identification of per- /poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and other contaminants. Nontarget analysis using liquid chromatography– high resolution mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS) is a valuable approach in characterizing for contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in the environment. However, identification of these analytes can be quite costly or taxing without proper analytical standards. To circumvent this problem we utilize Quantitative structureretention relationships (QSRR) models to predict elution order and retention times. Properties calculated from density functional theory (DFT) and the conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) theory are used to produce our QSRR models, which can be calculated for virtually any analyte. We show that this methodology has beenmore » « less
-
null (Ed.)Sublimation has been known at least since the middle ages. This process is frequently taught in schools through use of phase diagrams. Astonishingly, such a well-known process appears to still harbor secrets. Under conditions in which compound sublimation occurs, gas-phase ions are frequently detected using mass spectrometry. This was exploited in matrix-assisted ionization in vacuum vMAI) by adding analyte to subliming compounds used as matrices. Good vMAI matrices were those that ionize the added analyte with high sensitivity, but even matrices that fail this test often produce ions of likely matrix impurities suggesting that they may be good matrices for some compound types. We also show that binary matrices may be manipulated to provide desired properties such as fast analyses and improved sensitivity. These results imply that sublimation in some cases is more complicated than just molecules leaving a surface and that understanding the physical force responsible, and how the nonvolatile compound becomes charged, could lead to improved ionization efficiency for mass spectrometry. Here we provide insights into this process and an explanation of why this unexpected phenomenon has not previously been reported.more » « less
-
RationaleNew ionization processes have been developed for biological mass spectrometry (MS) in which the matrix lifts the nonvolatile analyte into the gas phase as ions without any additional energy input. We rationalized that additional fundamental knowledge is needed to assess analytical utility for the field of synthetic polymers and additives. MethodsDifferent mass spectrometers (Thermo Orbitrap (Q‐)Exactive (Focus); Waters SYNAPT G2(S)) were employed. The formation of multiply charged polymer ions upon exposure of the matrix/analyte(/salt) sample to sub‐atmospheric pressure directly from the solid state and surfaces facilitates the use of advanced mass spectrometers for detection of polymeric materials including consumer products (e.g., gum). ResultsAstonishingly, using nothing more than a small molecule matrix compound (e.g., 2‐methyl‐2‐nitropropane‐1,3‐diol or 3‐nitrobenzonitrile) and a salt (e.g., mono‐ or divalent cation(s)), such samples upon exposure to sub‐atmospheric pressure transfer nonvolatile polymersandnonvolatile salts into the gas phase as multiply charged ions. These successes contradict the conventional understanding of ionization in MS, because can nonvolatile polymers be lifted in the gas phase as ions not only by as little as a volatile matrix but also by the salt required for ionizing the analyte through noncovalent metal cation adduction(s). Prototypevacuummatrix‐assisted ionization (vMAI) and automated sources using a contactless approach are demonstrated for direct analyses of synthetic polymers and plasticizers, minimizing the risk of contamination using direct sample introduction into the mass spectrometer vacuum. ConclusionsDirect ionization methods from surfaces without the need of high voltage, a laser, or even applied heat are demonstrated for characterization of detailed materials using (ultra)high‐resolution and accurate mass measurements enabled by the multiply charged ions extending the mass range of high‐performance mass spectrometers and use of a split probe sample introduction device. Our vision is that, with further development of fundamentals and dedicated sources, both spatial‐ and temporal‐resolution measurements are within reach if sensitivity is addressed for decreasing sample‐size measurements.more » « less
-
Abstract Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) has become an important analytical tool for the label‐free chemical imaging of diverse molecules in biological specimens. This minireview surveys some emerging methods in the context of factors that can lead to inaccurate information in MSI, chemical and spatial aberrations, along with their common sources. Matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization, based on organic matrices, has become the most widely used MSI technique for biomolecules. However, due to inherent limitations associated with the use of organic matrices, for example, heterogeneous matrix‐analyte cocrystallization, and spectral interferences due to the matrix, laser desorption ionization (LDI) from inorganic and nanophotonic platforms has emerged as an alternative MSI modality with complementary advantages. In this review, inorganic and nanophotonic platforms for LDI‐MSI, their applications in imaging, notable merits, and limitations are described.more » « less
