Nontarget analysis using liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS) is a valuable approach in characterizing for contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in the environment. However, identification of these analytes can be quite costly or taxing without proper analytical standards. To circumvent this problem we utilize Quantitative structure-retention relationships (QSRR) models to predict elution order and retention times. Properties calculated from density functional theory (DFT) and the conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) theory are used to produce our QSRR models, which can be calculated for virtually any analyte. We show that this methodology has been successful in identification of per- /poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and other contaminants. Nontarget analysis using liquid chromatography– high resolution mass spectrometry (LC–HRMS) is a valuable approach in characterizing for contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in the environment. However, identification of these analytes can be quite costly or taxing without proper analytical standards. To circumvent this problem we utilize Quantitative structureretention relationships (QSRR) models to predict elution order and retention times. Properties calculated from density functional theory (DFT) and the conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO-RS) theory are used to produce our QSRR models, which can be calculated for virtually any analyte. We show that this methodology has been
more »
« less
Matrix effects demystified: Strategies for resolving challenges in analytical separations of complex samples
Matrix effects can significantly impede the accuracy, sensitivity, and reliability of separation techniques presenting a formidable challenge to the analytical process. It is crucial to address matrix effects to achieve accurate and precise measurements in complex matrices. The multifaceted nature of matrix effects which can be influenced by factors such as target analyte, sample preparation protocol, composition, and choice of instrument necessitates a pragmatic approach when analyzing complex matrices. This review aims to highlight common challenges associated with matrix effects throughout the entire analytical process with emphasis on gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry, and sample preparation techniques. These techniques are susceptible to matrix effects that could lead to ion suppression/enhancement or impact the analyte signal at various stages of the analytical workflow. The assessment, quantification, and mitigation of matrix effects are necessary in developing any analytical method. Strategies can be implemented to reduce or eliminate the matrix effect by changing the type of ionization, improving extraction and clean‐up methods, optimization of chromatography conditions, and corrective calibration methods. While development of an effective strategy to completely mitigate matrix effects remains elusive, an integrated approach that combines sample preparation, analytical extraction, and effective instrumental analysis remains the most promising avenue for identifying and resolving matrix effects.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2144591
- PAR ID:
- 10473572
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Separation Science
- Volume:
- 46
- Issue:
- 23
- ISSN:
- 1615-9306
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Sublimation has been known at least since the middle ages. This process is frequently taught in schools through use of phase diagrams. Astonishingly, such a well-known process appears to still harbor secrets. Under conditions in which compound sublimation occurs, gas-phase ions are frequently detected using mass spectrometry. This was exploited in matrix-assisted ionization in vacuum vMAI) by adding analyte to subliming compounds used as matrices. Good vMAI matrices were those that ionize the added analyte with high sensitivity, but even matrices that fail this test often produce ions of likely matrix impurities suggesting that they may be good matrices for some compound types. We also show that binary matrices may be manipulated to provide desired properties such as fast analyses and improved sensitivity. These results imply that sublimation in some cases is more complicated than just molecules leaving a surface and that understanding the physical force responsible, and how the nonvolatile compound becomes charged, could lead to improved ionization efficiency for mass spectrometry. Here we provide insights into this process and an explanation of why this unexpected phenomenon has not previously been reported.more » « less
-
RationaleNew ionization processes have been developed for biological mass spectrometry (MS) in which the matrix lifts the nonvolatile analyte into the gas phase as ions without any additional energy input. We rationalized that additional fundamental knowledge is needed to assess analytical utility for the field of synthetic polymers and additives. MethodsDifferent mass spectrometers (Thermo Orbitrap (Q‐)Exactive (Focus); Waters SYNAPT G2(S)) were employed. The formation of multiply charged polymer ions upon exposure of the matrix/analyte(/salt) sample to sub‐atmospheric pressure directly from the solid state and surfaces facilitates the use of advanced mass spectrometers for detection of polymeric materials including consumer products (e.g., gum). ResultsAstonishingly, using nothing more than a small molecule matrix compound (e.g., 2‐methyl‐2‐nitropropane‐1,3‐diol or 3‐nitrobenzonitrile) and a salt (e.g., mono‐ or divalent cation(s)), such samples upon exposure to sub‐atmospheric pressure transfer nonvolatile polymersandnonvolatile salts into the gas phase as multiply charged ions. These successes contradict the conventional understanding of ionization in MS, because can nonvolatile polymers be lifted in the gas phase as ions not only by as little as a volatile matrix but also by the salt required for ionizing the analyte through noncovalent metal cation adduction(s). Prototypevacuummatrix‐assisted ionization (vMAI) and automated sources using a contactless approach are demonstrated for direct analyses of synthetic polymers and plasticizers, minimizing the risk of contamination using direct sample introduction into the mass spectrometer vacuum. ConclusionsDirect ionization methods from surfaces without the need of high voltage, a laser, or even applied heat are demonstrated for characterization of detailed materials using (ultra)high‐resolution and accurate mass measurements enabled by the multiply charged ions extending the mass range of high‐performance mass spectrometers and use of a split probe sample introduction device. Our vision is that, with further development of fundamentals and dedicated sources, both spatial‐ and temporal‐resolution measurements are within reach if sensitivity is addressed for decreasing sample‐size measurements.more » « less
-
Abstract Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) has become an important analytical tool for the label‐free chemical imaging of diverse molecules in biological specimens. This minireview surveys some emerging methods in the context of factors that can lead to inaccurate information in MSI, chemical and spatial aberrations, along with their common sources. Matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization, based on organic matrices, has become the most widely used MSI technique for biomolecules. However, due to inherent limitations associated with the use of organic matrices, for example, heterogeneous matrix‐analyte cocrystallization, and spectral interferences due to the matrix, laser desorption ionization (LDI) from inorganic and nanophotonic platforms has emerged as an alternative MSI modality with complementary advantages. In this review, inorganic and nanophotonic platforms for LDI‐MSI, their applications in imaging, notable merits, and limitations are described.more » « less
-
Quantifying trace levels of microplastics in complex environmental media remains a challenge. In this study, an approach combining field collection of samples from different depths, sample size fractionation, and plastic quantification via pyrolysis-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Py-GC–MS) was employed to identify and quantify microplastics at two public beaches along the northeast coast of the U.S. (Salisbury beach, MA and Hampton beach, NH). A simple sampling tool was used to collect beach sand from depth intervals of 0–5 cm and 5–10 cm, respectively. The samples were sieved to give three size fractions: coarse (>1.2 mm), intermediate (100 μm–1.2 mm), and fine (1.2 μm–100 μm) particles. Following density separation and wet peroxide oxidation, a low-temperature solvent extraction protocol involving 2-chlorophenol was used to extract polyester (PET), polystyrene (PS), polyamide (PA), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The extract was analyzed using Py-GC–MS for the respective polymers, while the solid residue was pyrolyzed separately for polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP). The one-step solvent extraction method significantly simplified the sample matrix and improved the sensitivity of analysis. Among the samples, PET was detected in greater quantities in the fine fraction than in the intermediate size fraction, and PET fine particles were located predominantly in the surface sand. Similar to PET, PS was detected at higher mass concentrations in the fine particles in most samples. These results underscore the importance of beach environment for plastic fragmentation, where a combination of factors including UV irradiation, mechanical abrasion, and water exposure promote plastic breakdown. Surface accumulation of fine plastic particles may also be attributed to transport of microplastics through wind and tides. The proposed sample treatment and analysis methods may allow sensitive and quantitative measurements of size or depth related distribution patterns of microplastics in complex environmental media.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
