More Like this

1. Modeling the potential distribution of the threatened Grey-necked Picathartes Picathartes oreas across its entire range

   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270923000175  

   Tsetagho, Guilain; Bradfer-Lawrence, Tom; Taku, Awa II; Abernethy, Katharine A.; Abwe, Ekwoge E.; Tsi Angwafo, E.; Atuo, Fidelis; Fichtler, Martin; Fotso, Roger; Shirley, Matthew H.; et al (January 2023, Bird Conservation International)

   Understanding the distribution and extent of suitable habitats is critical for the conservation of endangered and endemic taxa. Such knowledge is limited for many Central African species, including the rare and globally threatened Grey-necked Picathartes Picathartes oreas, one of only two species in the family Picathartidae endemic to the forests of Central Africa. Despite growing concerns about land-use change resulting in fragmentation and loss of forest cover in the region, neither the extent of suitable habitat nor the potential species’ distribution is well known. We combine 339 (new and historical) occurrence records of Grey-necked Picathartes with environmental variables to model the potential global distribution. We used a Maximum Entropy modelling approach that accounted for sampling bias. Our model suggests that Grey-necked Picathartes distribution is strongly associated with steeper slopes and high levels of forest cover, while bioclimatic, vegetation health, and habitat condition variables were all excluded from the final model. We predicted 17,327 km2 of suitable habitat for the species, of which only 2,490 km2 (14.4%) are within protected areas where conservation designations are strictly enforced. These findings show a smaller global distribution of predicted suitable habitat for the Grey-necked Picathartes than previously thought. This work provides evidence to inform a revision of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List status, and may warrant upgrading the status of the species from “Near Threatened” to “Vulnerable”. 

   more » « less
2. Out of sight and out of mind? The conservation status of subterranean biodiversity in the United States and Canada

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-025-03099-6  

   Niemiller, Matthew L; Zigler, Kirk S; Curtis, Amanda N; Trapeni, Carter M; Slay, Michael E; Culver, David C; Hutchins, Benjamin T; Kendall_Niemiller, K Denise (July 2025, Biodiversity and Conservation)

   Subterranean ecosystems harbor globally important yet highly threatened biodiversity. Unfortunately, subterranean biodiversity is often neglected in regional and global conservation initiatives, including conservation assessments. We reviewed the conservation status and threats to subterranean species based on the two most popular conservation assessment protocols in North America, NatureServe and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List, as well as federal and state/provincial protection status of the 1,460 described cave-obligate species occurring in the United States and Canada. Only 9.3% of species have been assessed under IUCN Red List criteria compared to 77.9% of species assessed under NatureServe criteria; notably, 1,065 and 116 of species are assessed at an elevated risk of extinction by NatureServe and IUCN Red List, respectively. Just 41 species are listed or proposed to be listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act and none of the 10 species that occur in Canada are federally listed. Vertebrates (fishes and salamanders), decapods (crayfishes and shrimps), and U.S. federally listed species are overrepresented on the list of species with IUCN Red List assessments compared to other taxonomic groups, particularly arachnids, millipedes, and insects. Most species assessed under IUCN Red List criteria as well as federally listed species occur in the Edwards Plateau and Balcones Escarpment karst region of Texas. Major threats frequently reported in conservation assessments include habitat degradation, pollution/contamination, recreational activities, climate change, and groundwater exploitation; however, information on threats was lacking for most species for nearly all major taxonomic groups, except decapods, fishes, and salamanders. The intrinsic vulnerability of subterranean biodiversity coupled with the many potential threats facing species and extensive biodiversity knowledge gaps makes assessing their conservation status and ultimately their protection a challenging endeavor. We highlight several limitations of implementing current conservation assessment approaches while offering recommendations to improve our ability to assess the conservation status of subterranean biodiversity to better inform sound local to global conservation policies and actions. 

   more » « less
3. Plant conservation assessment at scale: Rapid triage of extinction risks

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10355  

   AuBuchon‐Elder, Taylor; Minx, Patrick; Bookout, Bess; Kellogg, Elizabeth A. (January 2023, PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET)

   Societal Impact StatementThe current rate of global biodiversity loss creates a pressing need to increase efficiency and throughput of extinction risk assessments in plants. We must assess as many plant species as possible, working with imperfect knowledge, to address the habitat loss and extinction threats of the Anthropocene. Using the biodiversity database, Botanical Information and Ecology Network (BIEN), and the Andropogoneae grass tribe as a case study, we demonstrate that large‐scale, preliminary conservation assessments can play a fundamental role in accelerating plant conservation pipelines and setting priorities for more in‐depth investigations. SummaryThe International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List criteria are widely used to determine extinction risks of plant and animal life. Here, we used The Red List's criterion B, Geographic Range Size, to provide preliminary conservation assessments of the members of a large tribe of grasses, the Andropogoneae, with ~1100 species, including maize, sorghum, and sugarcane and their wild relatives.We used georeferenced occurrence data from the Botanical Information and Ecology Network (BIEN) and automated individual species assessments using ConR to demonstrate efficacy and accuracy in using time‐saving tools for conservation research. We validated our results with those from the IUCN‐recommended assessment tool, GeoCAT.We discovered a remarkably large gap in digitized information, with slightly more than 50% of the Andropogoneae lacking sufficient information for assessment. ConR and GeoCAT largely agree on which taxa are of least concern (>90%) or possibly threatened (<10%), highlighting that automating assessments with ConR is a viable strategy for preliminary conservation assessments of large plant groups. Results for crop wild relatives are similar to those for the entire dataset.Increasing digitization and collection needs to be a high priority. Available rapid assessment tools can then be used to identify species that warrant more comprehensive investigation. 

   more » « less
4. A global reptile assessment highlights shared conservation needs of tetrapods

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04664-7  

   Cox, Neil; Young, Bruce E.; Bowles, Philip; Fernandez, Miguel; Marin, Julie; Rapacciuolo, Giovanni; Böhm, Monika; Brooks, Thomas M.; Hedges, S. Blair; Hilton-Taylor, Craig; et al (May 2022, Nature)

   Abstract Comprehensive assessments of species’ extinction risks have documented the extinction crisis 1 and underpinned strategies for reducing those risks 2 . Global assessments reveal that, among tetrapods, 40.7% of amphibians, 25.4% of mammals and 13.6% of birds are threatened with extinction 3 . Because global assessments have been lacking, reptiles have been omitted from conservation-prioritization analyses that encompass other tetrapods 4–7 . Reptiles are unusually diverse in arid regions, suggesting that they may have different conservation needs 6 . Here we provide a comprehensive extinction-risk assessment of reptiles and show that at least 1,829 out of 10,196 species (21.1%) are threatened—confirming a previous extrapolation 8 and representing 15.6 billion years of phylogenetic diversity. Reptiles are threatened by the same major factors that threaten other tetrapods—agriculture, logging, urban development and invasive species—although the threat posed by climate change remains uncertain. Reptiles inhabiting forests, where these threats are strongest, are more threatened than those in arid habitats, contrary to our prediction. Birds, mammals and amphibians are unexpectedly good surrogates for the conservation of reptiles, although threatened reptiles with the smallest ranges tend to be isolated from other threatened tetrapods. Although some reptiles—including most species of crocodiles and turtles—require urgent, targeted action to prevent extinctions, efforts to protect other tetrapods, such as habitat preservation and control of trade and invasive species, will probably also benefit many reptiles. 

   more » « less
5. Assessing risk for butterflies in the context of climate change, demographic uncertainty, and heterogeneous data sources

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1584  

   Forister, Matthew L.; Grames, Eliza M.; Halsch, Christopher A.; Burls, Kevin J.; Carroll, Cas F.; Bell, Katherine L.; Jahner, Joshua P.; Bradford, Taylor A.; Zhang, Jing; Cong, Qian; et al (July 2023, Ecological Monographs)

   Abstract Ongoing declines in insect populations have led to substantial concern and calls for conservation action. However, even for relatively well studied groups, like butterflies, information relevant to species‐specific status and risk is scattered across field guides, the scientific literature, and agency reports. Consequently, attention and resources have been spent on a minuscule fraction of insect diversity, including a few well studied butterflies. Here we bring together heterogeneous sources of information for 396 butterfly species to provide the first regional assessment of butterflies for the 11 western US states. For 184 species, we use monitoring data to characterize historical and projected trends in population abundance. For another 212 species (for which monitoring data are not available, but other types of information can be collected), we use exposure to climate change, development, geographic range, number of host plants, and other factors to rank species for conservation concern. A phylogenetic signal is apparent, with concentrations of declining and at‐risk species in the families Lycaenidae and Hesperiidae. A geographic bias exists in that many species that lack monitoring data occur in the more southern states where we expect that impacts of warming and drying trends will be most severe. Legal protection is rare among the taxa with the highest risk values: of the top 100 species, one is listed as threatened under the US Endangered Species Act and one is a candidate for listing. Among the many taxa not currently protected, we highlight a short list of species in decline, includingVanessa annabella,Thorybes mexicanus,Euchloe ausonides, andPholisora catullus. Notably, many of these species have broad geographic ranges, which perhaps highlights a new era of insect conservation in which small or fragmented ranges will not be the only red flags that attract conservation attention. 

   more » « less