More Like this

1. Cities Shape the Diversity and Spread of Nonnative Species

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102722-012749  

   Potgieter, Luke J; Li, Daijiang; Baiser, Benjamin; Kühn, Ingolf; Aronson, Myla FJ; Carboni, Marta; Celesti-Grapow, Laura; de_Matos, Ana_Carolina L; Lososová, Zdeňka; Montaño-Centellas, Flavia A; et al (August 2024, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics)

   The globalization of trade and increased human mobility have facilitated the introduction and spread of nonnative species, posing significant threats to biodiversity and human well-being. As centers of global trade and human populations, cities are foci for the introduction, establishment, and spread of nonnative species. We present a global synthesis of urban characteristics that drive biological invasions within and across cities, focusing on four axes: (a) connectivity, (b) physical properties, (c) culture and socioeconomics, and (d) biogeography and climate. Urban characteristics such as increased connectivity within and among cities, city size and age, and wealth emerged as important drivers of nonnative species diversity and spread, while the relative importance of biogeographic and climate drivers varied considerably. Elaborating how these characteristics shape biological invasions in cities is crucial for designing and implementing strategies to mitigate the impacts of invasions on ecological systems and human well-being. 

   more » « less
2. Defining hybridization thresholds for native species conservation in the genomic era

   https://doi.org/10.1093/fshmag/vuaf023  

   Kovach, Ryan; Bell, Donovan; Amish, Steve; Smith, Seth; Cook, Kristen; Schmetterling, David; Jaeger, Matt; Whiteley, Andrew (May 2025, Fisheries)

   ABSTRACT Human-induced hybridization among genetically distinct groups of fish is a widespread and complex problem in fisheries management. A particularly challenging facet of human-induced hybridization is deciding which fish should be prioritized for conservation action or investment, and which should not. The increasing availability of genomic data in fisheries management demands that explicit hybridization frameworks and associated hybridization thresholds be developed, as increasing resolution will inevitably demonstrate that small amounts of nonnative ancestry are present in populations or species that were previously thought to be nonhybridized. A key question then becomes, how do we make rational decisions regarding resource prioritization for populations or species with, for example, 10, 1, 0.1 or even 0.01% nonnative ancestry? We use extensive data from Westslope Cutthroat Trout Onchorhynchus lewisi to describe how objective, data-based decision frameworks can be developed to help managers conserve genetic variation, while minimizing nonnative ancestry and the risk of outbreeding depression. While the conservation implications of hybridization are nuanced and context-dependent, the approach described herein is general and can be extended to other species. 

   more » « less
3. Genetics and the question of purity in cutthroat trout restoration

   https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13516  

   Biermann, Christine; G. Havlick, David (September 2021, Restoration Ecology)

   As molecular techniques become more advanced, scientists and practitioners are calling for restoration to leverage genetic and genomic approaches. We address the role of genetics in the restoration and conservation of cutthroat trout in the western United States, where new genetic insights have upended previous assumptions about trout diversity and distribution. Drawing on a series of examples, we examine howgenetically puretrout populations are identified, protected, and produced through restoration practices. In landscapes that have been profoundly impacted by human activities, genetics can offer seemingly objective metrics for restoration projects. Our case studies, however, indicate that (1) genetic purity is fragile and contingent, with notions of what genetics are “pure” for a given species or subspecies continually changing, and (2) restoration focused on achieving “genetically pure” native populations can deliberately or inadvertently obscure the socioecological histories of particular sites and species, even as (3) many “genetically pure” trout populations have endured on the landscape as a result of human modifications such as roads and dams. In addition to raising conceptual questions, designations of genetic purity influence policy. These include tensions between restoring connectivity and restoring genetic purity, influencing Wild and Scenic River Act designations, and the securing of water rights. Cutthroat trout restoration would benefit from adopting a broader, more holistic framework rather than fixating exclusively or primarily on genetic purity and hybridization threats. 

   more » « less
4. Wild, Native, or Pure: Trout as Genetic Bodies

   https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243920978307  

   Havlick, David_G; Biermann, Christine (December 2020, Science, Technology, & Human Values)

   Advances in genetics and genomics have raised new questions in trout restoration and management, specifically about species identity and purity, which fish to value, and where these fish belong. This paper examines how this molecular turn in fisheries management is influencing wild and native trout policy in Colorado. Examples from two small Colorado watersheds, Bear Creek and Sand Creek, illustrate how framing trout as genetic bodies can guide managers to care for or kill trout populations in the interest of rectifying decades of genetic disruption caused by human activity. While trout management has typically relied on human intervention, the turn to genetic science is prompting new classifications of lineage and taxa, altering long-standing conservation priorities, and reorienting the manipulation of biological processes such as reproduction and dispersal. As a result, other social and ecological factors may be pushed to the margins of management decisions. These changes warrant greater conversation about the consequences of molecular analyses and the values embedded in trout science and conservation more broadly. 

   more » « less
5. Dynamic Habitat Disturbance and Ecological Resilience (DyHDER): modeling population responses to habitat condition

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3023  

   Murphy, Brendan_P; Walsworth, Timothy_E; Belmont, Patrick; Conner, Mary_M; Budy, Phaedra (February 2020, Ecosphere)

   Abstract Understanding how populations respond to spatially heterogeneous habitat disturbance is as critical to conservation as it is challenging. Here, we present a new, free, and open‐source metapopulation model: Dynamic Habitat Disturbance and Ecological Resilience (DyHDER), which incorporates subpopulation habitat condition and connectivity into a population viability analysis framework. Modeling temporally dynamic and spatially explicit habitat disturbance of varying magnitude and duration is accomplished through the use of habitat time‐series data and a mechanistic approach to adjusting subpopulation vital rates. Additionally, DyHDERuses a probabilistic dispersal model driven by site‐specific habitat suitability, density dependence, and directionally dependent connectivity. In the first application of DyHDER, we explore how fragmentation and projected climate change are predicted to impact a well‐studied Bonneville cutthroat trout metapopulation in the Logan River (Utah,USA). The DyHDERmodel predicts which subpopulations are most susceptible to disturbance, as well as the potential interactions between stressors. Further, the model predicts how populations may be expected to redistribute following disturbance. This information is valuable to conservationists and managers faced with protecting populations of conservation concern across landscapes undergoing changing disturbance regimes. The DyHDERmodel provides a valuable and generalizable new tool to explore metapopulation resilience to spatially and temporally dynamic stressors for a diverse range of taxa and ecosystems. 

   more » « less