We explore the relative roles of Earth’s axial tilt (‘tilt effect’) and orbital eccentricity (‘distance effect’) in generating the seasonal cycle of tropical sea surface temperature (SST), decomposing the two contributions using simulations of an Earth System model varying eccentricity and longitude of perihelion. Tropical SST seasonality is largely explained by the annual contribution from tilt, but with significant contributions from the semiannual contribution from tilt and annual contribution from distance, especially in regions where the tilt annual contribution is relatively small. Precessional changes to tropical SST seasonality are readily explained by the distance annual component whose amplitude increases linearly with eccentricity and whose phase changes linearly with the longitude of perihelion, while the tilt contributions remain essentially unchanged. As such, the annual cycle contribution from distance can become significant at high eccentricity (e > 0.05) and dominate the SST annual cycle in some regions of the Tropics. The annual cycle tropical SST response to the distance effect consists of a tropics-wide warming peaking ∼2 months after perihelion consistent with a direct thermodynamic effect, and a dynamic contribution characterized by a cooling of the Pacific cold tongue peaking 5-6 months after perihelion. For current orbital conditions, the thermodynamic contribution acts to dampen the tropical SST seasonal cycle of the northern hemisphere from the tilt influence and amplify it in the southern hemisphere. The dynamic contribution acts to shift the Pacific cold tongue seasonal cycle arising from tilt to earlier in the season, by ∼1 month.
more »
« less
A role for orbital eccentricity in Earth’s seasonal climate
Abstract The seasonality of Earth’s climate is driven by two factors: the tilt of the Earth’s rotation axis relative to the plane of its orbit (hereafter thetilt effect), and the variation in the Earth–Sun distance due to the Earth’s elliptical orbit around the Sun (hereafter thedistance effect). The seasonal insolation change between aphelion and perihelion is only ~ 7% of the annual mean and it is thus assumed that the distance effect is not relevant for the seasons. A recent modeling study by the authors and collaborators demonstrated however that the distance effect is not small for the Pacific cold tongue: it drives an annual cycle there that is dynamically distinct and ~ 1/3 of the amplitude from the known annual cycle arising from the tilt effect. The simulations also suggest that the influence of distance effect is significant and pervasive across several other regional climates, in both the tropics and extratropics. Preliminary work suggests that the distance effect works its influence through the thermal contrast between the mostly ocean hemisphere centered on the Pacific Ocean (the ‘Marine hemisphere’) and the hemisphere opposite to it centered over Africa (the ‘Continental hemisphere’), analogous to how the tilt effect drives a contrast between the northern and southern hemispheres. We argue that the distance effect should be fully considered as an annual cycle forcing in its own right in studies of Earth’s modern seasonal cycle. Separately considering the tilt and distance effects on the Earth’s seasonal cycle provides new insights into the workings of our climate system, and of direct relevance to paleoclimate where there are outstanding questions for long-term climate changes that are related to eccentricity variations.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2303385
- PAR ID:
- 10478593
- Publisher / Repository:
- Springer Science + Business Media
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geoscience Letters
- Volume:
- 10
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2196-4092
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The Pacific–North American (PNA) teleconnection pattern is one of the prominent atmospheric circulation modes in the extratropical Northern Hemisphere, and its seasonal to interannual predictability is suggested to originate from El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). Intriguingly, the PNA teleconnection pattern exhibits variance at near-annual frequencies, which is related to a rapid phase reversal of the PNA pattern during ENSO years, whereas the ENSO sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies in the tropical Pacific are evolving much slower in time. This distinct seasonal feature of the PNA pattern can be explained by an amplitude modulation of the interannual ENSO signal by the annual cycle (i.e., the ENSO combination mode). The ENSO-related seasonal phase transition of the PNA pattern is reproduced well in an atmospheric general circulation model when both the background SST annual cycle and ENSO SST anomalies are prescribed. In contrast, this characteristic seasonal evolution of the PNA pattern is absent when the tropical Pacific background SST annual cycle is not considered in the modeling experiments. The background SST annual cycle in the tropical Pacific modulates the ENSO-associated tropical Pacific convection response, leading to a rapid enhancement of convection anomalies in winter. The enhanced convection results in a fast establishment of the large-scale PNA teleconnection during ENSO years. The dynamics of this ENSO–annual cycle interaction fills an important gap in our understanding of the seasonally modulated PNA teleconnection pattern during ENSO years.more » « less
-
We explore the relative roles of Earth’s axial tilt (‘tilt effect’) and orbital eccentricity (‘distance effect’) on the seasonal cycle of tropical sea surface temperature (SST), decomposing the two contributions using simulations of an Earth System model varying eccentricity and longitude of perihelion. This dataset archives model output produced in this investigation using the Community Earth System Model version 2, and MATLAB code for analyzing the data.more » « less
-
Abstract We revisit the nature of the ocean bottom pressure (pb) seasonal cycle by leveraging the mounting GRACE‐basedpbrecord and its assimilation in the ocean state estimates produced by the project for Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean (ECCO). We focus on the mean seasonal cycle from both data and ECCO estimates, examining their similarities and differences and exploring the underlying causes. Despite substantial year‐to‐year variability, the 21‐year period studied (2002–2022) provides a relatively robust estimate of the mean seasonal cycle. Results indicate that thepbannual harmonic tends to dominate but the semi‐annual harmonic can also be important (e.g., subpolar North Pacific, Bellingshausen Basin). Amplitudes and short‐scale phase variability are enhanced near coasts and continental shelves, emphasizing the importance of bottom topography in shaping the seasonal cycle inpb. Comparisons of GRACE and ECCO estimates indicate good qualitative agreement, but considerable quantitative differences remain in many areas. The GRACE amplitudes tend to be higher than those of ECCO typically by 10%–50%, and by more than 50% in extensive regions, particularly around continental boundaries. Phase differences of more than 1 (0.5) months for the annual (semiannual) harmonics are also apparent. Larger differences near coastal regions can be related to enhanced GRACE data uncertainties and also to the absence of gravitational attraction and loading effects in ECCO. Improvements in both data and model‐based estimates are still needed to narrow present uncertainties inpbestimates.more » « less
-
Abstract The global seasonal cycle of energy in Earth’s climate system is quantified using observations and reanalyses. After removing long-term trends, net energy entering and exiting the climate system at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) should agree with the sum of energy entering and exiting the ocean, atmosphere, land, and ice over the course of an average year. Achieving such a balanced budget with observations has been challenging. Disagreements have been attributed previously to sparse observations in the high-latitude oceans. However, limiting the local vertical integration of new global ocean heat content estimates to the depth to which seasonal heat energy is stored, rather than integrating to 2000 m everywhere as done previously, allows closure of the global seasonal energy budget within statistical uncertainties. The seasonal cycle of energy storage is largest in the ocean, peaking in April because ocean area is largest in the Southern Hemisphere and the ocean’s thermal inertia causes a lag with respect to the austral summer solstice. Seasonal cycles in energy storage in the atmosphere and land are smaller, but peak in July and September, respectively, because there is more land in the Northern Hemisphere, and the land has more thermal inertia than the atmosphere. Global seasonal energy storage by ice is small, so the atmosphere and land partially offset ocean energy storage in the global integral, with their sum matching time-integrated net global TOA energy fluxes over the seasonal cycle within uncertainties, and both peaking in April.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
