We study the problem of chasing convex bodies online: given a sequence of convex bodies the algorithm must respond with points in an online fashion (i.e., is chosen before is revealed). The objective is to minimize the sum of distances between successive points in this sequence. Bubeck et al. (STOC 2019) gave a competitive algorithm for this problem. We give an algorithm that is competitive for any sequence of length .
more »
« less
Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs):13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022)
We present an O((log n)²)competitive algorithm for metrical task systems (MTS) on any npoint metric space that is also 1competitive for service costs. This matches the competitive ratio achieved by Bubeck, Cohen, Lee, and Lee (2019) and the refined competitive ratios obtained by Coester and Lee (2019). Those algorithms work by first randomly embedding the metric space into an ultrametric and then solving MTS there. In contrast, our algorithm is cast as regularized gradient descent where the regularizer is a multiscale metric entropy defined directly on the metric space. This answers an open question of Bubeck (Highlights of Algorithms, 2019).
more »
« less
 Award ID(s):
 2007079
 NSFPAR ID:
 10483029
 Editor(s):
 Braverman, Mark
 Publisher / Repository:
 Schloss Dagstuhl – LeibnizZentrum für Informatik
 Date Published:
 Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
 Metrical task systems online algorithms metric embeddings convex optimization Theory of computation → Online algorithms Theory of computation → Mathematical optimization Theory of computation → Random projections and metric embeddings
 Format(s):
 Medium: X
 Sponsoring Org:
 National Science Foundation
More Like this


We examine the problem of designing learningaugmented algorithms for metrical task systems (MTS) that exploit machinelearned advice while maintaining rigorous, worstcase guarantees on performance. We propose an algorithm, DART, that achieves this dual objective, providing cost within a multiplicative factor (1+ϵ) of the machinelearned advice (i.e., consistency) while ensuring cost within a multiplicative factor 2O(1/ϵ) of a baseline robust algorithm (i.e., robustness) for any ϵ>0 . We show that this exponential tradeoff between consistency and robustness is unavoidable in general, but that in important subclasses of MTS, such as when the metric space has bounded diameter and in the k server problem, our algorithm achieves improved, polynomial tradeoffs between consistency and robustness.more » « less

Given a metric space ℳ = (X,δ), a weighted graph G over X is a metric tspanner of ℳ if for every u,v ∈ X, δ(u,v) ≤ δ_G(u,v) ≤ t⋅ δ(u,v), where δ_G is the shortest path metric in G. In this paper, we construct spanners for finite sets in metric spaces in the online setting. Here, we are given a sequence of points (s₁, …, s_n), where the points are presented one at a time (i.e., after i steps, we have seen S_i = {s₁, … , s_i}). The algorithm is allowed to add edges to the spanner when a new point arrives, however, it is not allowed to remove any edge from the spanner. The goal is to maintain a tspanner G_i for S_i for all i, while minimizing the number of edges, and their total weight. Under the L₂norm in ℝ^d for arbitrary constant d ∈ ℕ, we present an online (1+ε)spanner algorithm with competitive ratio O_d(ε^{d} log n), improving the previous bound of O_d(ε^{(d+1)}log n). Moreover, the spanner maintained by the algorithm has O_d(ε^{1d}log ε^{1})⋅ n edges, almost matching the (offline) optimal bound of O_d(ε^{1d})⋅ n. In the plane, a tighter analysis of the same algorithm provides an almost quadratic improvement of the competitive ratio to O(ε^{3/2}logε^{1}log n), by comparing the online spanner with an instanceoptimal spanner directly, bypassing the comparison to an MST (i.e., lightness). As a counterpart, we design a sequence of points that yields a Ω_d(ε^{d}) lower bound for the competitive ratio for online (1+ε)spanner algorithms in ℝ^d under the L₁norm. Then we turn our attention to online spanners in general metrics. Note that, it is not possible to obtain a spanner with stretch less than 3 with a subquadratic number of edges, even in the offline setting, for general metrics. We analyze an online version of the celebrated greedy spanner algorithm, dubbed ordered greedy. With stretch factor t = (2k1)(1+ε) for k ≥ 2 and ε ∈ (0,1), we show that it maintains a spanner with O(ε^{1}logε^{1})⋅ n^{1+1/k} edges and O(ε^{1}n^{1/k}log² n) lightness for a sequence of n points in a metric space. We show that these bounds cannot be significantly improved, by introducing an instance that achieves an Ω(1/k⋅ n^{1/k}) competitive ratio on both sparsity and lightness. Furthermore, we establish the tradeoff among stretch, number of edges and lightness for points in ultrametrics, showing that one can maintain a (2+ε)spanner for ultrametrics with O(ε^{1}logε^{1})⋅ n edges and O(ε^{2}) lightness.more » « less

Given a metric space ℳ = (X,δ), a weighted graph G over X is a metric tspanner of ℳ if for every u,v ∈ X, δ(u,v) ≤ δ_G(u,v) ≤ t⋅ δ(u,v), where δ_G is the shortest path metric in G. In this paper, we construct spanners for finite sets in metric spaces in the online setting. Here, we are given a sequence of points (s₁, …, s_n), where the points are presented one at a time (i.e., after i steps, we have seen S_i = {s₁, … , s_i}). The algorithm is allowed to add edges to the spanner when a new point arrives, however, it is not allowed to remove any edge from the spanner. The goal is to maintain a tspanner G_i for S_i for all i, while minimizing the number of edges, and their total weight. Under the L₂norm in ℝ^d for arbitrary constant d ∈ ℕ, we present an online (1+ε)spanner algorithm with competitive ratio O_d(ε^{d} log n), improving the previous bound of O_d(ε^{(d+1)}log n). Moreover, the spanner maintained by the algorithm has O_d(ε^{1d}log ε^{1})⋅ n edges, almost matching the (offline) optimal bound of O_d(ε^{1d})⋅ n. In the plane, a tighter analysis of the same algorithm provides an almost quadratic improvement of the competitive ratio to O(ε^{3/2}logε^{1}log n), by comparing the online spanner with an instanceoptimal spanner directly, bypassing the comparison to an MST (i.e., lightness). As a counterpart, we design a sequence of points that yields a Ω_d(ε^{d}) lower bound for the competitive ratio for online (1+ε)spanner algorithms in ℝ^d under the L₁norm. Then we turn our attention to online spanners in general metrics. Note that, it is not possible to obtain a spanner with stretch less than 3 with a subquadratic number of edges, even in the offline setting, for general metrics. We analyze an online version of the celebrated greedy spanner algorithm, dubbed ordered greedy. With stretch factor t = (2k1)(1+ε) for k ≥ 2 and ε ∈ (0,1), we show that it maintains a spanner with O(ε^{1}logε^{1})⋅ n^{1+1/k} edges and O(ε^{1}n^{1/k}log² n) lightness for a sequence of n points in a metric space. We show that these bounds cannot be significantly improved, by introducing an instance that achieves an Ω(1/k⋅ n^{1/k}) competitive ratio on both sparsity and lightness. Furthermore, we establish the tradeoff among stretch, number of edges and lightness for points in ultrametrics, showing that one can maintain a (2+ε)spanner for ultrametrics with O(ε^{1}logε^{1})⋅ n edges and O(ε^{2}) lightness.more » « less

We study the minimumcost metric perfect matching problem under online i.i.d arrivals. We are given a fixed metric with a server at each of the points, and then requests arrive online, each drawn independently from a known probability distribution over the points. Each request has to be matched to a free server, with cost equal to the distance. The goal is to minimize the expected total cost of the matching. Such stochastic arrival models have been widely studied for the maximization variants of the online matching problem; however, the only known result for the minimization problem is a tight O(log n)competitiveness for the randomorder arrival model. This is in contrast with the adversarial model, where an optimal competitive ratio of O(log n) has long been conjectured and remains a tantalizing open question. In this paper, we show that the i.i.d model admits substantially better algorithms: our main result is an O((log log log n)^2)competitive algorithm in this model, implying a strict separation between the i.i.d model and the adversarial and random order models. Along the way we give a 9competitive algorithm for the line and tree metrics  the first O(1)competitive algorithm for any nontrivial arrival model for these muchstudied metrics.more » « less