skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Separating MAX 2-AND, MAX DI-CUT and MAX CUT
Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), the best approximation ratio that can be obtained in polynomial time for the MAX CUT problem is αCUT ≃ 0.87856, obtained by the celebrated SDP-based approximation algorithm of Goemans and Williamson. The currently best approximation algorithm for MAX DI-CUT, i.e., the MAX CUT problem in directed graphs, achieves a ratio of about 0.87401, leaving open the question whether MAX DI-CUT can be approximated as well as MAX CUT. We obtain a slightly improved algorithm for MAX DI-CUT and a new UGC-hardness result for it, showing that 0.87446 ≤ αDI-CUT ≤ 0.87461, where αDI-CUT is the best approximation ratio that can be obtained in polynomial time for MAX DI-CUT under UGC. The new upper bound separates MAX DI-CUT from MAX CUT, resolving a question raised by Feige and Goemans. A natural generalization of MAX DI-CUT is the MAX 2-AND problem in which each constraint is of the form z1∧z2, where z1 and z2 are literals, i.e., variables or their negations (In MAX DI-CUT each constraint is of the form \neg{x1}∧x2, where x1 and x2 are variables.) Austrin separated MAX 2-AND from MAX CUT by showing that α2AND < 0.87435 and conjectured that MAX 2-AND and MAX DI-CUT have the same approximation ratio. Our new lower bound on MAX DI-CUT refutes this conjecture, completing the separation of the three problems MAX 2-AND, MAX DI-CUT and MAX CUT. We also obtain a new lower bound for MAX 2-AND, showing that 0.87414 ≤ α2AND ≤ 0.87435. Our upper bound on MAX DI-CUT is achieved via a simple, analytical proof. The lower bounds on MAX DI-CUT and MAX 2-AND (the new approximation algorithms) use experimentally-discovered distributions of rounding functions which are then verified via computer-assisted proofs.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2008920
PAR ID:
10483146
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
IEEE
Date Published:
Journal Name:
2023 IEEE 64th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS)
ISBN:
979-8-3503-1894-4
Page Range / eLocation ID:
234 to 252
Format(s):
Medium: X
Location:
Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, 35th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC 2020))
    A systematic study of simultaneous optimization of constraint satisfaction problems was initiated by Bhangale et al. [ICALP, 2015]. The simplest such problem is the simultaneous Max-Cut. Bhangale et al. [SODA, 2018] gave a .878-minimum approximation algorithm for simultaneous Max-Cut which is almost optimal assuming the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC). For single instance Max-Cut, Goemans-Williamson [JACM, 1995] gave an α_GW-approximation algorithm where α_GW ≈ .87856720... which is optimal assuming the UGC. It was left open whether one can achieve an α_GW-minimum approximation algorithm for simultaneous Max-Cut. We answer the question by showing that there exists an absolute constant ε₀ ≥ 10^{-5} such that it is NP-hard to get an (α_GW- ε₀)-minimum approximation for simultaneous Max-Cut assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. 
    more » « less
  2. ; (, Operations Research Letters)
    This paper considers the relationship between semidefinite programs (SDPs), matrix rank, and maximum cuts of graphs. Utilizing complementary slackness conditions for SDPs, we investigate when the rank 1 feasible solution corresponding to a max cut is the unique optimal solution to the Goemans-Williamson max cut SDP by showing the existence of an optimal dual solution with rank n-1 . Our results consider connected bipartite graphs and graphs with multiple max cuts. We conclude with a conjecture for general graphs. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik)
    Bringmann, Karl; Grohe, Martin; Puppis, Gabriele; Svensson, Ola (Ed.)
    We consider the problem of query-efficient global max-cut on a weighted undirected graph in the value oracle model examined by [Rubinstein et al., 2018]. Graph algorithms in this cut query model and other query models have recently been studied for various other problems such as min-cut, connectivity, bipartiteness, and triangle detection. Max-cut in the cut query model can also be viewed as a natural special case of submodular function maximization: on query S ⊆ V, the oracle returns the total weight of the cut between S and V\S. Our first main technical result is a lower bound stating that a deterministic algorithm achieving a c-approximation for any c > 1/2 requires Ω(n) queries. This uses an extension of the cut dimension to rule out approximation (prior work of [Graur et al., 2020] introducing the cut dimension only rules out exact solutions). Secondly, we provide a randomized algorithm with Õ(n) queries that finds a c-approximation for any c < 1. We achieve this using a query-efficient sparsifier for undirected weighted graphs (prior work of [Rubinstein et al., 2018] holds only for unweighted graphs). To complement these results, for most constants c ∈ (0,1], we nail down the query complexity of achieving a c-approximation, for both deterministic and randomized algorithms (up to logarithmic factors). Analogously to general submodular function maximization in the same model, we observe a phase transition at c = 1/2: we design a deterministic algorithm for global c-approximate max-cut in O(log n) queries for any c < 1/2, and show that any randomized algorithm requires Ω(n/log n) queries to find a c-approximate max-cut for any c > 1/2. Additionally, we show that any deterministic algorithm requires Ω(n²) queries to find an exact max-cut (enough to learn the entire graph). 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik)
    Ene, Alina; Chattopadhyay, Eshan (Ed.)
    We study the classic Max-Cut problem under multiple cardinality constraints, which we refer to as the Constrained Max-Cut problem. Given a graph G = (V, E), a partition of the vertices into c disjoint parts V₁, …, V_c, and cardinality parameters k₁, …, k_c, the goal is to select a set S ⊆ V such that |S ∩ V_i| = k_i for each i ∈ [c], maximizing the total weight of edges crossing S (i.e., edges with exactly one endpoint in S).\r\nBy designing an approximate kernel for Constrained Max-Cut and building on the correlation rounding technique of Raghavendra and Tan (2012), we present a (0.858 - ε)-approximation algorithm for the problem when c = O(1). The algorithm runs in time O(min{k/ε, n}^poly(c/ε) + poly(n)), where k = ∑_{i∈[c]} k_i and n = |V|. This improves upon the (1/2 + ε₀)-approximation of Feige and Langberg (2001) for Max-Cut_k (the special case when c = 1, k₁ = k), and generalizes the (0.858 - ε)-approximation of Raghavendra and Tan (2012), which only applies when min{k,n-k} = Ω(n) and does not handle multiple constraints.\r\nWe also establish that, for general values of c, it is NP-hard to determine whether a feasible solution exists that cuts all edges. Finally, we present a 1/2-approximation algorithm for Max-Cut under an arbitrary matroid constraint. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; (, ACM Transactions on Algorithms)
    null (Ed.)
    Finding locally optimal solutions for MAX-CUT and MAX- k -CUT are well-known PLS-complete problems. An instinctive approach to finding such a locally optimum solution is the FLIP method. Even though FLIP requires exponential time in worst-case instances, it tends to terminate quickly in practical instances. To explain this discrepancy, the run-time of FLIP has been studied in the smoothed complexity framework. Etscheid and Röglin (ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 2017) showed that the smoothed complexity of FLIP for max-cut in arbitrary graphs is quasi-polynomial. Angel, Bubeck, Peres, and Wei (STOC, 2017) showed that the smoothed complexity of FLIP for max-cut in complete graphs is ( O Φ 5 n 15.1 ), where Φ is an upper bound on the random edge-weight density and Φ is the number of vertices in the input graph. While Angel, Bubeck, Peres, and Wei’s result showed the first polynomial smoothed complexity, they also conjectured that their run-time bound is far from optimal. In this work, we make substantial progress toward improving the run-time bound. We prove that the smoothed complexity of FLIP for max-cut in complete graphs is O (Φ n 7.83 ). Our results are based on a carefully chosen matrix whose rank captures the run-time of the method along with improved rank bounds for this matrix and an improved union bound based on this matrix. In addition, our techniques provide a general framework for analyzing FLIP in the smoothed framework. We illustrate this general framework by showing that the smoothed complexity of FLIP for MAX-3-CUT in complete graphs is polynomial and for MAX - k - CUT in arbitrary graphs is quasi-polynomial. We believe that our techniques should also be of interest toward showing smoothed polynomial complexity of FLIP for MAX - k - CUT in complete graphs for larger constants k . 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email