More Like this

1. Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential Privacy

   Xinwei Zhang; Xiangyi Chen; Mingyi Hong; Zhiwei Steven Wu; Jinfeng Yi (July 2022, International Conference on Machine Learning)

   Providing privacy protection has been one of the primary motivations of Federated Learning (FL). Recently, there has been a line of work on incorporating the formal privacy notion of differential privacy with FL. To guarantee the client-level differential privacy in FL algorithms, the clients’ transmitted model updates have to be clipped before adding privacy noise. Such clipping operation is substantially different from its counterpart of gradient clipping in the centralized differentially private SGD and has not been well-understood. In this paper, we first empirically demonstrate that the clipped FedAvg can perform surprisingly well even with substantial data heterogeneity when training neural networks, which is partly because the clients’ updates become similar for several popular deep architectures. Based on this key observation, we provide the convergence analysis of a differential private (DP) FedAvg algorithm and highlight the relationship between clipping bias and the distribution of the clients’ updates. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that rigorously investigates theoretical and empirical issues regarding the clipping operation in FL algorithms. 

   more » « less
2. Differentially Private Federated Learning with Shuffling and Client Self-Sampling

   Girgis, Antonious M; Data, Deepesh; and Diggavi, Suhas. (July 2021, IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT))

   This paper studies a distributed optimization problem in the federated learning (FL) framework under differential privacy constraints, whereby a set of clients having local samples are connected to an untrusted server, who wants to learn a global model while preserving the privacy of clients’ local datasets. We propose a new client sampling called self-sampling that reflects the random availability of clients in the learning process in FL. We analyze the differential privacy of the SGD with client self-sampling by composing amplification by sub-sampling along with amplification by shuffling. Furthermore, we analyze the convergence of the proposed SGD algorithm showing that we can get a reasonable learning performance while preserving the privacy of clients’ data even with client self-sampling. 

   more » « less
3. Latency-Aware Semi-Synchronous Client Selection and Model Aggregation for Wireless Federated Learning

   https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15110352  

   Yu, Liangkun; Sun, Xiang; Albelaihi, Rana; Yi, Chen (November 2023, Future Internet)

   Federated learning (FL) is a collaborative machine-learning (ML) framework particularly suited for ML models requiring numerous training samples, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), and Random Forest, in the context of various applications, e.g., next-word prediction and eHealth. FL involves various clients participating in the training process by uploading their local models to an FL server in each global iteration. The server aggregates these models to update a global model. The traditional FL process may encounter bottlenecks, known as the straggler problem, where slower clients delay the overall training time. This paper introduces the Latency-awarE Semi-synchronous client Selection and mOdel aggregation for federated learNing (LESSON) method. LESSON allows clients to participate at different frequencies: faster clients contribute more frequently, therefore mitigating the straggler problem and expediting convergence. Moreover, LESSON provides a tunable trade-off between model accuracy and convergence rate by setting varying deadlines. Simulation results show that LESSON outperforms two baseline methods, namely FedAvg and FedCS, in terms of convergence speed and maintains higher model accuracy compared to FedCS. 

   more » « less
4. Is Aggregation the Only Choice? Federated Learning via Layer-wise Model Recombination

   Hu, M; Yue, Z; Xie, X; Chen, C; Huang, Y; Wei, X; Lian, X; Liu, Y; Chen, M (August 2024, Association for Computing Machinery)

   Although Federated Learning (FL) enables global model training across clients without compromising their raw data, due to the unevenly distributed data among clients, existing Federated Averaging (FedAvg)-based methods suffer from the problem of low inference performance. Specifically, different data distributions among clients lead to various optimization directions of local models. Aggregating local models usually results in a low-generalized global model, which performs worse on most of the clients. To address the above issue, inspired by the observation from a geometric perspective that a well-generalized solution is located in a flat area rather than a sharp area, we propose a novel and heuristic FL paradigm named FedMR (Federated Model Recombination). The goal of FedMR is to guide the recombined models to be trained towards a flat area. Unlike conventional FedAvg-based methods, in FedMR, the cloud server recombines collected local models by shuffling each layer of them to generate multiple recombined models for local training on clients rather than an aggregated global model. Since the area of the flat area is larger than the sharp area, when local models are located in different areas, recombined models have a higher probability of locating in a flat area. When all recombined models are located in the same flat area, they are optimized towards the same direction. We theoretically analyze the convergence of model recombination. Experimental results show that, compared with state-of-the-art FL methods, FedMR can significantly improve the inference accuracy without exposing the privacy of each client. 

   more » « less
5. Dynamic Client Clustering, Bandwidth Allocation, and Workload Optimization for Semi-Synchronous Federated Learning

   https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13234585  

   Yu, Liangkun; Sun, Xiang; Albelaihi, Rana; Park, Chaeeun; Shao, Sihua (December 2024, Electronics)

   Federated Learning (FL) revolutionizes collaborative machine learning among Internet of Things (IoT) devices by enabling them to train models collectively while preserving data privacy. FL algorithms fall into two primary categories: synchronous and asynchronous. While synchronous FL efficiently handles straggler devices, its convergence speed and model accuracy can be compromised. In contrast, asynchronous FL allows all devices to participate but incurs high communication overhead and potential model staleness. To overcome these limitations, the paper introduces a semi-synchronous FL framework that uses client tiering based on computing and communication latencies. Clients in different tiers upload their local models at distinct frequencies, striking a balance between straggler mitigation and communication costs. Building on this, the paper proposes the Dynamic client clustering, bandwidth allocation, and local training for semi-synchronous Federated learning (DecantFed) algorithm to dynamically optimize client clustering, bandwidth allocation, and local training workloads in order to maximize data sample processing rates in FL. DecantFed dynamically optimizes client clustering, bandwidth allocation, and local training workloads for maximizing data processing rates in FL. It also adapts client learning rates according to their tiers, thus addressing the model staleness issue. Extensive simulations using benchmark datasets like MNIST and CIFAR-10, under both IID and non-IID scenarios, demonstrate DecantFed’s superior performance. It outperforms FedAvg and FedProx in convergence speed and delivers at least a 28% improvement in model accuracy, compared to FedProx. 

   more » « less