More Like this

1. Sperm and alternative reproductive tactics: a review of existing theory and empirical data

   https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0075  

   Kustra, Matthew C.; Alonzo, Suzanne H. (December 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences)

   null (Ed.)

   Males that exhibit alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs) often differ in the risk of sperm competition and the energetic trade-offs they experience. The resulting patterns of selection could lead to between-tactic differences in ejaculate traits. Despite extensive research on male ARTs, there is no comprehensive review of whether and what differences in sperm traits exist between male ARTs. We review existing theory on ejaculate evolution relevant to ARTs and then conduct a comprehensive vote-counting review of the empirical data comparing sperm traits between males adopting ARTs. Despite the general expectation that sneaker males should produce sperm that are more competitive (e.g. higher quality or performance), we find that existing theory does not predict explicitly how males adopting ARTs should differ in sperm traits. The majority of studies find no significant difference in sperm performance traits between dominant and sneaker males. However, when there is a difference, sneaker males tend to have higher sperm performance trait values than dominant males. We propose ways that future theoretical and empirical research can improve our understanding of the evolution of ejaculate traits in ARTs. We then highlight how studying ejaculate traits in species with ARTs will improve our broader knowledge of ejaculate evolution. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Fifty years of sperm competition’. 

   more » « less
2. Male secreted short glycoproteins link sperm competition to the reproductive isolation of species

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.040  

   Van_Goor, Justin; Turdiev, Asan; Speir, Savannah J; Manning, Jillian; Haag, Eric S (February 2025, Current Biology)

   Sperm competition is found across multicellular organisms using both external and internal fertilization. Sperm competition and post-copulatory cryptic female choice can promote incompatibility between species due to antagonistic co-evolution of the sexes within a species. This between-species incompatibility is accelerated and markedly asymmetrical when sexual mode differs, producing the “weak inbreeder, strong outcrosser” (WISO) pattern. Here, we show that male secreted short (MSS) sperm glycoproteins of nematodes constitute a gametic effector of WISO. In obligately outcrossing Caenorhabditis, MSS is dispensable for baseline fertility but required for intraspecific sperm competitiveness. MSS is lost in self-fertile lineages, likely as a response to selection for a hermaphrodite-biased sex ratio. Selfing hermaphrodites that mate with males of closely related outcrossing species are rapidly sterilized due to ovarian sperm invasion. The simplification of the male proteome in selfing species suggests many factors could contribute to invasivity. However, restoration of just MSS to the self-fertile C. briggsae is sufficient to induce mild invasivity. Further, MSS+ sperm appear to derive their competitive advantage from this behavior, directly linking interspecies incompatibility with intraspecific competition. MSS-related proteins (MSRPs) remaining in the C. briggsae genome are similar in structure, expression, and localization to MSS, but are not necessary for normal sperm competitiveness. Further, over-expression of the MSRP most similar to MSS, Cbr-MSRP-3, is insufficient to enhance competitiveness. We conclude that outcrossing species retain sperm competition factors that contribute to their reproductive isolation from selfing relatives that lost them. 

   more » « less
3. Cryptic Mate Preference in Male Bicyclus anynana Butterflies

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-023-09814-x  

   Siebenmorgen, Jacob P.; Tibbs, Taryn L.; Robertson, Deonna N.; Westerman, Erica L. (March 2023, Journal of Insect Behavior)

   While male mate choice has received sparse attention in comparison to female choice, it occurs often in insects. In addition, male insects may preferentially allocate sperm and ejaculate in response to female quality. Previous research indicates that male Bicyclus anynana butterflies can learn mate preference through prior exposure to females, though naïve males mate randomly. It is unclear whether this preference learning may also influence male sperm and ejaculate allocation after mate selection, or whether males have cryptic mate preference for female wing patterns independent of preference learning. Here we test whether B. anynana males adjust their sperm and ejaculate allocation in response to a learned preference. We also assess whether males exhibit an innate cryptic preference and adjust their sperm and ejaculate in response to female wing pattern. We compared number of eggs laid by females and spermatophore (male butterfly ejaculate) weight in four no-choice treatments: naïve male butterflies (having no prior exposure to females), paired with a 2 or 0-spot female, and experienced male butterflies (having a previous three-hour interaction with a 0-spot female), paired with a 2 or 0-spot female. All females used were naturally 2-spot females, 0-spot females had artificially blocked spots. We found that 0-spot females laid significantly more eggs than 2-spot females, independent of male experience. There was no effect of female phenotype or male experience on spermatophore weight. Our findings suggest that male B. anynana have an innate cryptic preference for 0-spot females, which has been shown in other studies to only be seen as a pre-copulatory preference when enhanced by early experience. 

   more » « less
4. Sexual selection and the ascent of women: Mate choice research since Darwin

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi6308  

   Rosenthal, Gil G.; Ryan, Michael J. (January 2022, Science)

   BACKGROUND Charles Darwin’s  Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex  tackled the two main controversies arising from the Origin of Species:  the evolution of humans from animal ancestors and the evolution of sexual ornaments. Most of the book focuses on the latter, Darwin’s theory of sexual selection. Research since supports his conjecture that songs, perfumes, and intricate dances evolve because they help secure mating partners. Evidence is overwhelming for a primary role of both male and female mate choice in sexual selection—not only through premating courtship but also through intimate interactions during and long after mating. But what makes one prospective mate more enticing than another? Darwin, shaped by misogyny and sexual prudery, invoked a “taste for the beautiful” without speculating on the origin of the “taste.” How to explain when the “final marriage ceremony” is between two rams? What of oral sex in bats, cloacal rubbing in bonobos, or the sexual spectrum in humans, all observable in Darwin’s time? By explaining desire through the lens of those male traits that caught his eyes and those of his gender and culture, Darwin elided these data in his theory of sexual evolution. Work since Darwin has focused on how traits and preferences coevolve. Preferences can evolve even if attractive signals only predict offspring attractiveness, but most attention has gone to the intuitive but tenuous premise that mating with gorgeous partners yields vigorous offspring. By focusing on those aspects of mating preferences that coevolve with male traits, many of Darwin’s influential followers have followed the same narrow path. The sexual selection debate in the 1980s was framed as “good genes versus runaway”: Do preferences coevolve with traits because traits predict genetic benefits, or simply because they are beautiful? To the broader world this is still the conversation. ADVANCES Even as they evolve toward ever-more-beautiful signals and healthier offspring, mate-choice mechanisms and courter traits are locked in an arms race of coercion and resistance, persuasion and skepticism. Traits favored by sexual selection often do so at the expense of chooser fitness, creating sexual conflict. Choosers then evolve preferences in response to the costs imposed by courters. Often, though, the current traits of courters tell us little about how preferences arise. Sensory systems are often tuned to nonsexual cues like food, favoring mating signals resembling those cues. And preferences can emerge simply from selection on choosing conspecifics. Sexual selection can therefore arise from chooser biases that have nothing to do with ornaments. Choice may occur before mating, as Darwin emphasized, but individuals mate multiple times and bias fertilization and offspring care toward favored partners. Mate choice can thus occur in myriad ways after mating, through behavioral, morphological, and physiological mechanisms. Like other biological traits, mating preferences vary among individuals and species along multiple dimensions. Some of this is likely adaptive, as different individuals will have different optimal mates. Indeed, mate choice may be more about choosing compatible partners than picking the “best” mate in the absolute sense. Compatibility-based choice can drive or reinforce genetic divergence and lead to speciation. The mechanisms underlying the “taste for the beautiful” determine whether mate choice accelerates or inhibits reproductive isolation. If preferences are learned from parents, or covary with ecological differences like the sensory environment, then choice can promote genetic divergence. If everyone shares preferences for attractive ornaments, then choice promotes gene flow between lineages. OUTLOOK Two major trends continue to shift the emphasis away from male “beauty” and toward how and why individuals make sexual choices. The first integrates neuroscience, genomics, and physiology. We need not limit ourselves to the feathers and dances that dazzled Darwin, which gives us a vastly richer picture of mate choice. The second is that despite persistent structural inequities in academia, a broader range of people study a broader range of questions. This new focus confirms Darwin’s insight that mate choice makes a primary contribution to sexual selection, but suggests that sexual selection is often tangential to mate choice. This conclusion challenges a persistent belief with sinister roots, whereby mate choice is all about male ornaments. Under this view, females evolve to prefer handsome males who provide healthy offspring, or alternatively, to express flighty whims for arbitrary traits. But mate-choice mechanisms also evolve for a host of other reasons Understanding mate choice mechanisms is key to understanding how sexual decisions underlie speciation and adaptation to environmental change. New theory and technology allow us to explicitly connect decision-making mechanisms with their evolutionary consequences. A century and a half after Darwin, we can shift our focus to females and males as choosers, rather than the gaudy by-products of mate choice. Mate choice mechanisms across domains of life. Sensory periphery for stimulus detection (yellow), brain for perceptual integration and evaluation (orange), and reproductive structures for postmating choice among pollen or sperm (teal). ILLUSTRATION: KELLIE HOLOSKI/ SCIENCE 

   more » « less
5. The life history of Drosophila sperm involves molecular continuity between male and female reproductive tracts

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2119899119  

   McCullough, Erin L.; Whittington, Emma; Singh, Akanksha; Pitnick, Scott; Wolfner, Mariana F.; Dorus, Steve (March 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

   Interactions between sperm and the female reproductive tract (FRT) are critical to reproductive success and yet are poorly understood. Because sperm complete their functional maturation within the FRT, the life history of sperm is likely to include a molecular “hand-off” from males to females. Although such intersexual molecular continuity is likely to be widespread among all internally fertilizing species, the identity and extent of female contributions are largely unknown. We combined semiquantitative proteomics with sex-specific isotopic labeling to catalog the posttesticular life history of the sperm proteome and determine the extent of molecular continuity between male and FRTs. We show that the Drosophila melanogaster sperm proteome undergoes substantial compositional changes after being transferred to the FRT. Multiple seminal fluid proteins initially associate with sperm, but most become undetectable after sperm are stored. Female-derived proteins also begin to associate with sperm immediately after mating, and they comprise nearly 20% of the postmating sperm proteome following 4 d of storage in the FRT. Female-derived proteins that associate with sperm are enriched for processes associated with energy metabolism, suggesting that female contributions support sperm viability during the prolonged period between copulation and fertilization. Our research provides a comprehensive characterization of sperm proteome dynamics and expands our understanding of the critical process of sperm–FRT interactions. 

   more » « less