skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Climate Change in the Thermosphere and Ionosphere From the Early Twentieth Century to Early Twenty‐First Century Simulated by the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model—eXtended
Title: Climate Change in the Thermosphere and Ionosphere From the Early Twentieth Century to Early Twenty‐First Century Simulated by the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model—eXtended
Abstract Motivated by numerous lower atmosphere climate model hindcast simulations, we performed simulations of the Earth's atmosphere from the surface up through the thermosphere‐ionosphere to reveal for the first time the century scale changes in the upper atmosphere from the 1920s through the 2010s using the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model—eXtended (WACCM‐X v. 2.1). We impose solar minimum conditions to get a clear indication of the effects of the long‐term forcing from greenhouse gas increases and changes of the Earth's magnetic field and to avoid the requirement for careful removal of the 11‐year solar cycle as in some previous studies using observations and models. These previous studies have shown greenhouse gas effects in the upper atmosphere but what has been missing is the time evolution with actual greenhouse gas increases throughout the last century, including the period of less than 5% increase prior to the space age and the transition to the over 25% increase in the latter half of the 20th century. Neutral temperature, density, and ionosphere changes are close to those reported in previous studies. Also, we find high correlation between the continuous carbon dioxide rate of change over this past century and that of temperature in the thermosphere and the ionosphere, attributed to the shorter adjustment time of the upper atmosphere to greenhouse gas changes relative to the longer time in the lower atmosphere. Consequently, WACCM‐X future scenario projections can provide valuable insight in the entire atmosphere of future greenhouse gas effects and mitigation efforts.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2050072 2049536
PAR ID:
10493132
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
JGR Atmospheres
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Volume:
129
Issue:
3
ISSN:
2169-897X
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences)
    Climate change is characterized by global surface warming associated with the increase of greenhouse gas population since the start of the industrial era. Growing evidence shows that the upper atmosphere is experiencing appreciable cooling over the last several decades. The seminal modeling study by Roble and Dickinson (1989) suggested potential effects of increased greenhouse gases on the ionosphere and thermosphere cooling which appear consistent with some observations. However, several outstanding issues remain regarding the role of CO 2 , other important contributors, and impacts of the cooling trend in the ionosphere and thermosphere: for example, (1) what is the regional variability of the trends? (2) the very strong ionospheric cooling observed by multiple incoherent scatter radars that does not fit with the prevailing theory based on the argument of anthropogenic greenhouse gas increases, why? (3) what is the effect of secular changes in Earth’s main magnetic field? Is it visible now in the ionospheric data and can it explain some of the regional variability in the observed ionospheric trends? (4) what is the impact of long-term cooling in the thermosphere on operational systems? (5) what are the appropriate strategic plans to ensure the long-term monitoring of the critical space climate? 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, AGU Advances)
    Abstract Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions significantly impact the middle and upper atmosphere. They cause cooling and thermal shrinking and affect the atmospheric structure. Atmospheric contraction results in changes in key atmospheric features, such as the stratopause height or the peak ionospheric electron density, and also results in reduced thermosphere density. These changes can impact, among others, the lifespan of objects in low Earth orbit, refraction of radio communication and GPS signals, and the peak altitudes of meteoroids entering the Earth's atmosphere. Given this, there is a critical need for observational capabilities to monitor the middle and upper atmosphere. Equally important is the commitment to maintaining and improving long‐term, homogeneous data collection. However, capabilities to observe the middle and upper atmosphere are decreasing rather than improving. 
    more » « less
  3. (, Atmosphere)
    Variability in the ionosphere during the 2020–2021 sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) is investigated using a combination of Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate-2 (COSMIC-2) observations and the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model with thermosphere–ionosphere eXtension (WACCM-X) simulations. The unprecedented spatial–temporal sampling of the low latitude ionosphere afforded by COSMIC-2 enables investigating the short-term (<5 days) variability in the ionosphere during the SSW event. The COSMIC-2 observations reveal a reduction in the diurnal and zonal mean ionosphere total electron content (ITEC) and reduced amplitude of the diurnal variation in the ionosphere during the SSW. Enhanced ITEC amplitudes of the semidiurnal solar and lunar migrating tides and the westward propagating semidiurnal tide with zonal wavenumber 3 are also observed. The WACCM-X simulations demonstrate that these variations are driven by variability in the stratosphere–mesosphere during the 2020–2021 SSW event. The results show the impact of the 2020–2021 SSW on the mean state, diurnal, and semidiurnal variations in the ionosphere, as well as the capabilities of the COSMIC-2 mission to observe short-term variability in the ionosphere that is driven by meteorological variability in the lower atmosphere. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate)
    This study explores the meteorological source and vertical propagation of gravity waves (GWs) that drive daytime traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs), using the specified dynamics version of the SD-WACCM-X (Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model with thermosphere-ionosphere eXtension) and the SAMI3 (Sami3 is Also a Model of the Ionosphere) simulations driven by SD-WACCM-X neutral wind and composition. A cold weather front moved over the northern-central USA (90–100°W, 35–45°N) during the daytime of 20 October 2020, with strong upward airflow. GWs with ~500–700 km horizontal wavelengths propagated southward and northward in the thermosphere over the north-central USA. Also, the perturbations were coherent from the surface to the thermosphere; therefore, the GWs were likely generated by vertical acceleration associated with the cold front over Minnesota and South Dakota. The convectively generated GWs had almost infinite vertical wavelength below ~100 km due to being evanescent. This implies that the GWs tunneled through their evanescent region in the middle atmosphere (where a squared vertical wavenumber is equal to or smaller than 0) and became freely propagating in the thermosphere and ionosphere. Medium-scale TIDs (MSTIDs) also propagated southward with the GWs, suggesting that the convectively generated GWs created MSTIDs. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; (, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences)
    During geomagnetic storms a large amount of energy is transferred into the ionosphere-thermosphere (IT) system, leading to local and global changes in e.g., the dynamics, composition, and neutral density. The more steady energy from the lower atmosphere into the IT system is in general much smaller than the energy input from the magnetosphere, especially during geomagnetic storms, and therefore details of the lower atmosphere forcing are often neglected in storm time simulations. In this study we compare the neutral density observed by Swarm-C during the moderate geomagnetic storm of 31 January to 3 February 2016 with the Thermosphere-Ionosphere-Electrodynamics-GCM (TIEGCM) finding that the model can capture the observed large scale neutral density variations better in the southern than northern hemisphere. The importance of more realistic lower atmospheric (LB) variations as specified by the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model eXtended (WACCM-X) with specified dynamics (SD) is demonstrated by improving especially the northern hemisphere neutral density by up to 15% compared to using climatological LB forcing. Further analysis highlights the importance of the background atmospheric condition in facilitating hemispheric different neutral density changes in response to the LB perturbations. In comparison, employing observationally based field-aligned current (FAC) versus using an empirical model to describe magnetosphere-ionosphere (MI) coupling leads to an 7–20% improved northern hemisphere neutral density. The results highlight the importance of the lower atmospheric variations and high latitude forcing in simulating the absolute large scale neutral density especially the hemispheric differences. However, focusing on the storm time variation with respect to the quiescent time, the lower atmospheric influence is reduced to 1–1.5% improvement with respect to the total observed neutral density. The results provide some guidance on the importance of more realistic upper boundary forcing and lower atmospheric variations when modeling large scale, absolute and relative neutral density variations. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Text Encoded Conversion
  • XML
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email