skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Monthly mean Eliassen-Palm fluxes and EP flux divergences for boreal winter months (Dec-Jan-Feb) from 1979 to 2020 using ERA5 data
The European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF) Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) data set (1979 – 2020) is used in many climate studies.  The present monthly mean data set of Eliassen-Palm fluxes (EP fluxes) and EP flux divergences, was created from twice-daily gridded values of ERA5 winds and temperature on pressure surfaces and is intended to fill a gap in availability.   It is compatible for use with ERA5 monthly mean data.   The EP flux is a diagnostic tool for assessing wave propagation and wave-mean flow interaction. It is a vector representation for the propagation of synoptic and planetary Rossby wave activity in the meridional plane.  An upward component indicates a poleward heat flux while an equatorward component indicates a poleward momentum flux.   EP flux divergence implies a source of Rossby wave activity, and EP flux convergence implies absorption of Rossby wave activity.  EP flux divergence represents the body force, or net effect of waves on the zonal mean zonal wind, with EP flux convergence causing deceleration of zonal mean westerlies and EP flux divergence causing acceleration. The primary effect of a region of EP flux convergence, however, is to induce poleward motion, with an associated mean meridional circulation and quadrupole of temperature anomalies in the meridional plane. EP fluxes are useful in investigating many planetary and synoptic scale weather phenomena such as the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) and Sudden Stratospheric Warmings (SSWs).   The meridional and vertical components of the EP flux are calculated in pressure coordinates using the following initial conditions:  Ground density (rho_0 ):P_0/R_0/T_0 Ground pressure (P_0): 1013hPa Ground temperature (T_0): Temperature at 1000hPa Earth radius (a) = 6378km   Dimensions in the data: Latitude: 90°N-90°S (grid spacing is 0.25°, as in the ERA5 reanalysis)  Pressure: 1 hPa-1000 hPa (levels are the same as in the ERA5 reanalysis)  Time: January 1979 – December 2020; December, January, February (DJF) only; 00z and 12z  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1947658
PAR ID:
10498542
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
Zenodo
Date Published:
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
Meteorology
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
    Abstract. This study quantifies differences among four widely usedatmospheric reanalysis datasets (ERA5, JRA-55, MERRA-2, and CFSR) in theirrepresentation of the dynamical changes induced by springtime polarstratospheric ozone depletion in the Southern Hemisphere from 1980 to 2001.The intercomparison is undertaken as part of the SPARC(Stratosphere–troposphere Processes and their Role in Climate) ReanalysisIntercomparison Project (S-RIP). The reanalyses are generally in goodagreement in their representation of the strengthening of the lowerstratospheric polar vortex during the austral spring–summer season,associated with reduced radiative heating due to ozone loss, as well as thedescent of anomalously strong westerly winds into the troposphere duringsummer and the subsequent poleward displacement and intensification of thepolar front jet. Differences in the trends in zonal wind between thereanalyses are generally small compared to the mean trends. The exception isCFSR, which exhibits greater disagreement compared to the other threereanalysis datasets, with stronger westerly winds in the lower stratospherein spring and a larger poleward displacement of the tropospheric westerlyjet in summer. The dynamical changes associated with the ozone hole are examined byinvestigating the momentum budget and then the eddy heat and momentumfluxes in terms of planetary- and synoptic-scale Rossby wave contributions.The dynamical changes are consistently represented across the reanalysesand support our dynamical understanding of the response of the coupledstratosphere–troposphere system to the ozone hole. Although our resultssuggest a high degree of consistency across the four reanalysis datasets inthe representation of these dynamical changes, there are larger differencesin the wave forcing, residual circulation, and eddy propagation changes compared to the zonal wind trends. In particular, there is a noticeabledisparity in these trends in CFSR compared to the other three reanalyses,while the best agreement is found between ERA5 and JRA-55. Greateruncertainty in the components of the momentum budget, as opposed to meancirculation, suggests that the zonal wind is better constrained by theassimilation of observations compared to the wave forcing, residualcirculation, and eddy momentum and heat fluxes, which are more dependent onthe model-based forecasts that can differ between reanalyses. Lookingforward, however, these findings give us confidence that reanalysis datasetscan be used to assess changes associated with the ongoing recovery ofstratospheric ozone. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Synoptic eddies embedded in a westerly flow undergo downstream developments due to their dispersive nature. This paper examines the finite-amplitude aspects of downstream development with the budget of local wave activity (LWA), including explicit contributions from diabatic heating. LWA captures well individual troughs/ridges and the wave packet, and its column budget affords simplified interpretations. In the LWA framework, (linear) downstream development demonstrated in previous analyses is represented by the LWA advection by the zonal reference flow plus LWA flux induced by the radiation of Rossby waves. In addition, convergence of nonlinear advective LWA flux, baroclinic sources at the lower boundary, meridional redistribution by eddy momentum flux, and diabatic sources and sinks complete the column budget of LWA. When applied to the life cycles of troughs within coherent wave packets in the Southern Hemisphere, the LWA budget reveals that individual troughs grow mainly through downstream development, convergence of nonlinear advective flux by eddies, and diabatic heating. Downstream development and divergence of nonlinear flux also dominate trough decay. Contributions from nonlinear advective eddy flux are large in the presence of a strong ridge either immediately upstream or downstream of the trough. Furthermore, anticyclonic components of advective LWA fluxes associated with the upstream or downstream ridge transfer LWA into or out of the trough. Diabatic contributions are significant when the heating exhibits a tilted vertical structure that gives rise to enhanced vertical gradient in heating. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract The poleward heat flux by atmospheric waves plays a pivotal role in maintaining the meridional temperature gradient. A recent study found that in the Northern Hemisphere the heat flux by transient eddies has been weakening, and the study attributed this weakening to the smaller equator‐to‐pole temperature gradient caused by Arctic warming. During the period of 1979–2019 examined here, for the annual mean, both the synoptic‐scale eddy heat flux and the temperature gradient had indeed declined. However, from October to April, the synoptic‐scale eddy flux trend is more closely tied to the planetary‐scale eddy heat flux trend, than to the temperature gradient trend. From June to August, the synoptic‐scale eddy flux decline can be attributed to a warming of the high‐latitude land areas. Therefore, a more comprehensive interpretation of the synoptic‐scale eddy heat flux trend needs to include the dynamics of the planetary‐scale waves and summer land warming. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Future projections of the poleward eddy heat flux by the atmosphere are often regarded as being uncertain because of the competing effect between surface and upper-tropospheric meridional temperature gradients. Previous idealized modeling studies showed that eddy heat flux response is more sensitive to the variability of lower-tropospheric temperature gradient. However, observational evidence is lacking. In this study, observational data analyses are performed to examine the relationships between eddy heat fluxes and temperature gradients during boreal winter by constructing daily indices. On the intraseasonal time scale, the surface temperature gradient is found to be more effective at regulating the synoptic-scale eddy heat flux (SF) than is the upper-tropospheric temperature gradient. Enhancements in surface temperature gradient, however, are subject to an inactive planetary-scale eddy heat flux (PF). The PF in turn is dependent on the zonal gradient in tropical convective heating. Consistent with these interactions, over the past 40 winters, the zonal gradient in tropical heating and PF have been trending upward, while the surface temperature gradient and SF have been trending downward. These results indicate that for a better understanding of eddy heat fluxes, attention should be given to zonal convective heating gradients in the tropics as much as to meridional temperature gradients. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract Clouds and radiation play an important role in warming events over the Southern Ocean (SO). Here we evaluate European Center for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis version 5 (ERA5) and Polar Weather Research Forecast (PWRF) output through comparison to surface‐based measurements of clouds, radiation, and the atmospheric state over the SO during 2017–2023 at Escudero Station (62.2°S, 58.97°W) on King George Island. ERA5 mean monthly downward shortwave (DSW) radiative fluxes are found to be 38–50 W m−2higher than observations in summer, whereas ERA5 mean monthly downward longwave (DLW) is biased by −18 to −22 W m−2in summer and −16 W m−2on average over the year. Comparisons of temperature, humidity, and lowest‐cloud base heights between ERA5 and observations rule these factors out as large contributors to the DLW flux biases. The similarity between observed DLW cloud forcing distributions for atmospheric columns containing low‐level liquid and ice‐only clouds suggests limited influence of cloud phase errors on DLW biases. Thus the most likely explanation for DLW flux biases in ERA5 is underestimated cloud optical depth, which is also consistent with DSW flux biases. Similar biases in ERA5 are found during atmospheric river (AR) events. By contrast, PWRF flux bias magnitudes are much smaller during AR events (−12 W m−2for DSW and −2 W m−2for DLW). After bias correction, ERA5 monthly average net cloud forcing over 2017–2023 is found to be a minimum of −107 W m−2in January and a maximum of 65 W m−2in June. 
    more » « less