skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Probabilistic Calibration and Prediction of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Using quoFEM
Liquefaction under cyclic loads can be predicted through advanced (liquefaction-capable) material constitutive models. However, such constitutive models have several input parameters whose values are often unknown or imprecisely known, requiring calibration via lab/in-situ test data. This study proposes a Bayesian updating framework that integrates probabilistic calibration of the soil model and probabilistic prediction of lateral spreading due to seismic liquefaction. In particular, the framework consists of three main parts: (1) Parametric study based on global sensitivity analysis, (2) Bayesian calibration of the primary input parameters of the constitutive model, and (3) Forward uncertainty propagation through a computational model simulating the response of a soil column under earthquake loading. For demonstration, the PM4Sand model is adopted, and cyclic strength data of Ottawa F-65 sand from cyclic direct simple shear tests are utilized to calibrate the model. The three main uncertainty analyses are performed using quoFEM, a SimCenter open-source software application for uncertainty quantification and optimization in the field of natural hazard engineering. The results demonstrate the potential of the framework linked with quoFEM to perform calibration and uncertainty propagation using sophisticated simulation models that can be part of a performance-based design workflow.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2131111
PAR ID:
10501933
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Springer, Cham
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022)
ISSN:
978-3-031-11898-2
ISBN:
978-3-031-11898-2
Format(s):
Medium: X
Location:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_152
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; (, Springer, Cham)
    Wang, L; Zhang, JM; Wang, R (Ed.)
    Liquefaction under cyclic loads can be predicted through advanced (liquefaction-capable) material constitutive models. However, such constitutive models have several input parameters whose values are often unknown or imprecisely known, requiring calibration via lab/in-situ test data. This study proposes a Bayesian updating framework that integrates probabilistic calibration of the soil model and probabilistic prediction of lateral spreading due to seismic liquefaction. In particular, the framework consists of three main parts: (1) Parametric study based on global sensitivity analysis, (2) Bayesian calibration of the primary input parameters of the constitutive model, and (3) Forward uncertainty propagation through a computational model simulating the response of a soil column under earthquake loading. For demonstration, the PM4Sand model is adopted, and cyclic strength data of Ottawa F-65 sand from cyclic direct simple shear tests are utilized to calibrate the model. The three main uncertainty analyses are performed using quoFEM, a SimCenter open-source software application for uncertainty quantification and optimization in the field of natural hazard engineering. The results demonstrate the potential of the framework linked with quoFEM to perform calibration and uncertainty propagation using sophisticated simulation models that can be part of a performance-based design workflow. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; (, Proceedings of the 2022 Eurasian OpenSees Days)
    The NHERI SimCenter is a nine-year research project that aims to advance the simulation of natural hazard impact on the built environment and communities. The SimCenter is developing several open-source workflow applications and an underlying scientific application framework. All applications built on this framework provide an OpenSees interface that enables users to use their existing models in advanced simulation studies, such as local and regional performance assessment, and uncertainty quantification (UQ). SimCenter applications provide researchers an opportunity to explore different extensions of their models by lowering the interdisciplinary barrier and encouraging collaboration. Among the applications, quoFEM provides access to UQ analyses with an easy-to-use, standardized interface. This work demonstrates the research enabled by quoFEM through the example of model calibration using PM4Sand, a soil constitutive model available in OpenSees. After an initial sensitivity analysis, the model is calibrated using Bayesian inference based on observations of hysteretic soil response from cyclic direct simple shear tests. The uncertainty in the model parameters is used in forward propagation to explore plausible lateral spreading scenarios due to seismic liquefaction. The results demonstrate the utility of quoFEM to the OpenSees community as a UQ-enabling tool. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, American Society of Civil Engineers)
    Numerical simulation of liquefiable soil under cyclic undrained loading is essential for predicting earthquake-induced deformation of geotechnical structures in liquefaction hazard evaluation. Successful simulation of soil response requires constitutive models that can reasonably predict soil behavior under dynamic loading. Many advanced constitutive models have been developed for soil liquefaction hazard evaluation in the past four decades. These advanced models are built on plasticity theories with different modifications and assumptions. Nevertheless, the core part of all models was mainly developed based on observations from constant-volume (CV) cyclic direct simple shear (DSS) tests. While CV tests are standardized in the widely recognized ASTM D8296-19, true-undrained (TU) cyclic DSS tests wherein pore water pressure (PWP) is directly measured have also been performed in academic research. CV and TU cyclic DSS data were successfully generated at California State University, Los Angeles (Cal State LA), from the same apparatus. In this paper, the PM4Sand plasticity model is calibrated using CV and TU data. The performance of CV- and TU-calibrated models is cross-compared with TU and CV data, respectively. While results suggest trends in liquefaction capacity predictions, further data is required for comprehensive validation. The outcomes of this paper also provide insight into the calibration of PM4Sand over a range of relative densities and loading conditions. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, Sixth Biot Conference on Poromechanics)
    Calibration and validation of constitutive models and numerical modeling techniques used in analysis of soil liquefaction and its effects are often based on extensive comparisons with the results of element tests and centrifuge experiments. While good quality experimental data are available to understand and quantify the stress-strain-strength response of liquefiable soils in monotonic and cyclic drained/undrained element (triaxial and direct simple shear) tests, the results of these experiments are often less repeatable when the soil approaches liquefaction state and relatively large deviatoric strains suddenly develop within a few cycles of loading. The main source of these less repeatable patterns of soil behavior appears to be instability rather than the attainment of a state of material failure. The goal of this paper is to investigate the role of instability on the stress-strain response of liquefiable soils by using a critical state sand plasticity model that is enriched with an internal length scale representing the potential shear bands that may develop during monotonic or cyclic loading conditions. Through a series of numerical simulations, it is shown that the global stress-strain response measured in the element tests is a good approximation of the soil constitutive response before an unstable condition such as shear banding or liquefaction develops in the soil specimen. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, Proc., Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V, Geotechnical Special Publication 290, S. J. Brandenberg and M. T. Manzari, eds., ASCE)
    This paper discusses three aspects of nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) practices that are important for evaluating the seismic performance of geotechnical structures affected by liquefaction or cyclic softening: (1) selection and calibration of constitutive models, (2) comparison of NDA results using two or more constitutive models, and (3) documentation. The ability of the selected constitutive models and calibration protocols to approximate the loading responses important to the system being analyzed is one of several technical factors affecting the quality of results from an NDA. Comparisons of single element simulations against empirical data for a broad range of loading conditions are essential for evaluating this factor. Critical comparisons of NDAs using two or more constitutive models are valuable for evaluating modeling uncertainty for specific systems and for identifying modeling limitations that need improvement. The utility of an NDA study depends on the documentation being sufficiently thorough to facilitate effective reviews, advance best practices, and support future reexaminations of a system's seismic performance. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email