skip to main content


Title: Probabilistic Calibration and Prediction of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Using quoFEM
Liquefaction under cyclic loads can be predicted through advanced (liquefaction-capable) material constitutive models. However, such constitutive models have several input parameters whose values are often unknown or imprecisely known, requiring calibration via lab/in-situ test data. This study proposes a Bayesian updating framework that integrates probabilistic calibration of the soil model and probabilistic prediction of lateral spreading due to seismic liquefaction. In particular, the framework consists of three main parts: (1) Parametric study based on global sensitivity analysis, (2) Bayesian calibration of the primary input parameters of the constitutive model, and (3) Forward uncertainty propagation through a computational model simulating the response of a soil column under earthquake loading. For demonstration, the PM4Sand model is adopted, and cyclic strength data of Ottawa F-65 sand from cyclic direct simple shear tests are utilized to calibrate the model. The three main uncertainty analyses are performed using quoFEM, a SimCenter open-source software application for uncertainty quantification and optimization in the field of natural hazard engineering. The results demonstrate the potential of the framework linked with quoFEM to perform calibration and uncertainty propagation using sophisticated simulation models that can be part of a performance-based design workflow.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2131111
PAR ID:
10501933
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Springer, Cham
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Performance Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering (Beijing 2022)
ISSN:
978-3-031-11898-2
ISBN:
978-3-031-11898-2
Format(s):
Medium: X
Location:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11898-2_152
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. The NHERI SimCenter is a nine-year research project that aims to advance the simulation of natural hazard impact on the built environment and communities. The SimCenter is developing several open-source workflow applications and an underlying scientific application framework. All applications built on this framework provide an OpenSees interface that enables users to use their existing models in advanced simulation studies, such as local and regional performance assessment, and uncertainty quantification (UQ). SimCenter applications provide researchers an opportunity to explore different extensions of their models by lowering the interdisciplinary barrier and encouraging collaboration. Among the applications, quoFEM provides access to UQ analyses with an easy-to-use, standardized interface. This work demonstrates the research enabled by quoFEM through the example of model calibration using PM4Sand, a soil constitutive model available in OpenSees. After an initial sensitivity analysis, the model is calibrated using Bayesian inference based on observations of hysteretic soil response from cyclic direct simple shear tests. The uncertainty in the model parameters is used in forward propagation to explore plausible lateral spreading scenarios due to seismic liquefaction. The results demonstrate the utility of quoFEM to the OpenSees community as a UQ-enabling tool. 
    more » « less
  2. Calibration and validation of constitutive models and numerical modeling techniques used in analysis of soil liquefaction and its effects are often based on extensive comparisons with the results of element tests and centrifuge experiments. While good quality experimental data are available to understand and quantify the stress-strain-strength response of liquefiable soils in monotonic and cyclic drained/undrained element (triaxial and direct simple shear) tests, the results of these experiments are often less repeatable when the soil approaches liquefaction state and relatively large deviatoric strains suddenly develop within a few cycles of loading. The main source of these less repeatable patterns of soil behavior appears to be instability rather than the attainment of a state of material failure. The goal of this paper is to investigate the role of instability on the stress-strain response of liquefiable soils by using a critical state sand plasticity model that is enriched with an internal length scale representing the potential shear bands that may develop during monotonic or cyclic loading conditions. Through a series of numerical simulations, it is shown that the global stress-strain response measured in the element tests is a good approximation of the soil constitutive response before an unstable condition such as shear banding or liquefaction develops in the soil specimen. 
    more » « less
  3. This paper discusses three aspects of nonlinear dynamic analysis (NDA) practices that are important for evaluating the seismic performance of geotechnical structures affected by liquefaction or cyclic softening: (1) selection and calibration of constitutive models, (2) comparison of NDA results using two or more constitutive models, and (3) documentation. The ability of the selected constitutive models and calibration protocols to approximate the loading responses important to the system being analyzed is one of several technical factors affecting the quality of results from an NDA. Comparisons of single element simulations against empirical data for a broad range of loading conditions are essential for evaluating this factor. Critical comparisons of NDAs using two or more constitutive models are valuable for evaluating modeling uncertainty for specific systems and for identifying modeling limitations that need improvement. The utility of an NDA study depends on the documentation being sufficiently thorough to facilitate effective reviews, advance best practices, and support future reexaminations of a system's seismic performance. 
    more » « less
  4. Cone Penetration Test (CPT) based simplified liquefaction evaluation procedures offer significant advantages over variants based on alternative in-situ test indices. However, the main drawback of CPT-based variants is that soil samples are typically not recovered during CPT sounding, and as a result, soils are often not characterized directly or tested further in the laboratory. The need thus arises to infer soil properties from CPT indices without physical confirmation. Utilizing an unprecedented database of field and laboratory test data from Christchurch, New Zealand, this study proposes deterministic and probabilistic correlations relating the soil behavior type index (Ic) to liquefaction susceptibility as defined by published criteria. The findings show that Ic can be used with reasonable accuracy as a proxy for laboratory index-test based criteria for assessing liquefaction susceptibility. Additionally, to assess liquefaction hazards in a fully probabilistic manner, the uncertainty of Ic for defining liquefaction susceptibility can be accounted for using an approach similar to that used to create fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering. The approaches used herein to develop deterministic and probabilistic Ic relationships for liquefaction susceptibility are not limited to soils from New Zealand, but rather, can be applied worldwide. 
    more » « less
  5. The stress-strain behavior of Ottawa F65 sand is investigated through an extensive series of constant volume stress-controlled cyclic direct simple shear (CDSS) tests performed at different densities, overburden pressures, and static shear stresses prior to cyclic shearing to quantify their effects on the cyclic strength of Ottawa F65 sand. Results of the CDSS tests are used in the constitutive model calibration exercise for the Liquefaction Experiments and Analysis Project (LEAP-2022). The collected database of CDSS tests is used to develop an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model capable of predicting Ottawa F65 liquefaction strength for a specified set of relative density, overburden pressure, static shear stress ratio, and cyclic shear stress ratio. After training, validation and testing, the ANN model is further assessed using blind prediction of the liquefaction strength in new CDSS tests for a relative density and overburden stress that are not available in the training dataset. CDSS tests under similar conditions were then carried out in the laboratory for validation of the ANN model. The comparisons of the predictions with the experimental results have demonstrated the ANN model predictive capability for liquefaction strength and its sensitivity to changes in relative density, overburden stress and cyclic stress ratio. 
    more » « less