Tribal Constitutions, Citing Slavery, and Petitioning for Freedom are digital legal history projects focused on expressions of sovereignty within tribal constitutions, the remnants of slavery in modern law, and the underexamined role of habeas petitioners in challenging coercion and confinement in the long-nineteenth-century United States. Each project deploys legal databases differently, but with the shared goal of contributing key insights to legal historical scholarship and offering interfaces that appeal to a broad, public audience. 
                        more » 
                        « less   
                    
                            
                            Sovereignty, Race, and Freedom in Constitutions, Citations, and Corpuses
                        
                    
    
            Tribal Constitutions, Citing Slavery, and Petitioning for Freedom are digital legal history projects focused on expressions of sovereignty within tribal constitutions, the remnants of slavery in modern law, and the underexamined role of habeas petitioners in challenging coercion and confinement in the long-nineteenth-century United States. Each project deploys legal databases differently, but with the shared goal of contributing key insights to legal historical scholarship and offering interfaces that appeal to a broad, public audience. 
        more » 
        « less   
        
    
                            - Award ID(s):
- 1946684
- PAR ID:
- 10502592
- Publisher / Repository:
- The Journal for Digital Legal History
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal for Digital Legal History
- Volume:
- 1
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2796-0226
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
- 
            
- 
            Tribal Constitutions, Citing Slavery, andPetitioning for Freedom are digital legal history projects focused onexpressions of sovereignty within tribal constitutions, the remnants of slaveryin modern law, and the underexamined role of habeas petitioners in challengingcoercion and confinement in the long-nineteenth-century United States. Eachproject deploys legal databases differently, but with the shared goal ofcontributing key insights to legal historical scholarship and offeringinterfaces that appeal to a broad, public audience.more » « less
- 
            Abstract Women’s legal mobilization in the American West between 1819 and 1924 is far more robust than scholars have previously understood. This article examines more than twenty women’s habeas corpus petitions to demonstrate the diversity of arguments that hundreds of women presented against gendered violence in courts throughout the American West. When analyzed collectively, women’s petitions highlight the importance of habeas as a tool against coverture, a legal convention that fostered gendered violence under slavery, colonization, exclusion, and detention. Women’s habeas petitions also reveal continuities in Black, Indigenous, immigrant, and incarcerated women’s legal strategies even as they faced varied forms of confinement and coercion according to their race, region, and era. Through an intersectional lens, this study combines quantitative and qualitative analysis to argue that women’s habeas histories house acts of resistance and are a central chapter in American legal tradition.more » « less
- 
            This paper addresses a gap in the AI governance literature in understanding collaboration between national governments and tribal nations in governing AI systems for emergency management. This conceptual work develops and presents a governance design framework for accountable AI systems to fill the knowledge gap by drawing from the fields of public administration, information systems, indigenous studies, and emergency management. This framework situates the governance framework in a cross-sovereignty historical, legal, and policy contexts. It captures the multi-level features and embeddedness of governance structures, including the levels of collaborative governance structure, software system governance rules, and technical software system design. The focal governance dynamics involve the collaborative process in the bi-directional relationship between governance rules and technical design for accountability and the feedback loop. The framework highlights the importance of multi-level and process considerations in designing accountable AI systems. Productive future research avenues include empirical investigation and resulting refinement of the framework and analytical rigor employing institutional grammar.more » « less
- 
            Abstract In this paper, we reflect on our collective experiences engaging with Anishinaabe Tribal Nations in the Great Lakes region to support Tribal sovereignty in decision‐making for food, energy, and water (FEW) systems. In these diverse experiences, we find common lessons. The first set of lessons contributes new empirical knowledge regarding the challenges and opportunities that rural Great Lakes Tribal Nations navigate for enacting sovereignty in decision‐making. Our experiences illustrate that while Tribal Nations benefit from a broad and deep commitment to sovereignty and many cultural strengths, they are often challenged by shortages in administrative capacity; technical support; and embeddedness in economic, socio‐cultural, and institutional dynamics that must be further negotiated for Tribes to enact the sovereignty to which they are inherently (and legally) entitled. Productive partnerships struggle when university partners fail to acknowledge these realities. The second set of lessons addresses the potential for, and challenges of, effective engagement processes. We find that engagement with university professionals is often mismatched with the priorities and needs of Tribal Nations. Effective engagement with Tribal Nations requires practical knowledge, applied assistance, and grounded, genuine relationships; these requirements often run counter to the institutional structures and priorities imposed by universities, federal funding agencies, and student recruitment. These findings, associated with both empirical knowledge and lessons on process, highlight shared insights on formidable barriers to effective engagement. Based on our firsthand experience working with rural Tribal Nations on FEW decision‐making, we share these reflections with particular focus on lessons learned for professionals who engage, or hope to engage, with Tribal Nations in rural settings and offer opportunities to transform engagement processes to better support the immediate, practical needs of rural Tribal Nations.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
 
                                    