An official website of the United States government
Training a machine learning model with data following a meaningful order, i.e., from easy to hard, has been proven to be effective in accelerating the training process and achieving better model performance. The key enabling technique is curriculum learning (CL), which has seen great success and has been deployed in areas like image and text classification. Yet, how CL affects the privacy of machine learning is unclear. Given that CL changes the way a model memorizes the training data, its influence on data privacy needs to be thoroughly evaluated. To fill this knowledge gap, we perform the first study and leverage membership inference attack (MIA) and attribute inference attack (AIA) as two vectors to quantify the privacy leakage caused by CL. Our evaluation of 9 real-world datasets with attack methods (NN-based, metric-based, label-only MIA, and NN-based AIA) revealed new insights about CL. First, MIA becomes slightly more effective when CL is applied, but the impact is much more prominent to a subset of training samples ranked as difficult. Second, a model trained under CL is less vulnerable under AIA, compared to MIA. Third, the existing defense techniques like MemGuard and MixupMMD are not effective under CL. Finally, based on our insights into CL, we propose a new MIA, termed Diff-Cali, which exploits the difficulty scores for result calibration and is demonstrated to be effective against all CL methods and the normal training method. With this study, we hope to draw the community's attention to the unintended privacy risks of emerging machine-learning techniques and develop new attack benchmarks and defense solutions.
more »
« less
Please Tell Me More: Privacy Impact of Explainability through the Lens of Membership Inference Attack
Explainability is increasingly recognized as an enabling technology for the broader adoption of machine learning (ML), particularly for safety-critical applications. This has given rise to explainable ML, which seeks to enhance the explainability of neural networks through the use of explanators. Yet, the pursuit for better explainability inadvertently leads to increased security and privacy risks. While there has been considerable research into the security risks of explainable ML, its potential privacy risks remain under-explored. To bridge this gap, we present a systematic study of privacy risks in explainable ML through the lens of membership inference. Building on the observation that, besides the accuracy of the model, robustness also exhibits observable differences among member samples and non-member samples, we develop a new membership inference attack. This attack extracts additional membership features from changes in model confidence under different levels of perturbations guided by the importance highlighted by the attribution maps in the explanators. Intuitively, perturbing important features generally results in a bigger loss in confidence for member samples. Using the member-non-member differences in both model performance and robustness, an attack model is trained to distinguish the membership. We evaluated our approach with seven popular explanators across various benchmark models and datasets. Our attack demonstrates there is non-trivial privacy leakage in current explainable ML methods. Furthermore, such leakage issue persists even if the attacker lacks the knowledge of training datasets or target model architectures. Lastly, we also found existing model and output-based defense mechanisms are not effective in mitigating this new attack.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10504228
- Publisher / Repository:
- IEEE
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
- ISSN:
- 2375-1207
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- San Francisco, CA
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Membership inference attacks (MIAs) are currently considered one of the main privacy attack strategies, and their defense mechanisms have also been extensively explored. However, there is still a gap between the existing defense approaches and ideal models in both performance and deployment costs. In particular, we observed that the privacy vulnerability of the model is closely correlated with the gap between the model's data-memorizing ability and generalization ability. To address it, we propose a new architecture-agnostic training paradigm called Center-based Relaxed Learning (CRL), which is adaptive to any classification model and provides privacy preservation by sacrificing a minimal or no loss of model generalizability. We emphasize that CRL can better maintain the model's consistency between member and non-member data. Through extensive experiments on common classification datasets, we empirically show that this approach exhibits comparable performance without requiring additional model capacity or data costs.more » « less
-
Abstract—Deploying machine learning models in production may allow adversaries to infer sensitive information about training data. There is a vast literature analyzing different types of inference risks, ranging from membership inference to reconstruction attacks. Inspired by the success of games (i.e. probabilistic experiments) to study security properties in cryptography, some authors describe privacy inference risks in machine learning using a similar game-based style. However, adversary capabilities and goals are often stated in subtly different ways from one presentation to the other, which makes it hard to relate and compose results. In this paper, we present a game-based framework to systematize the body of knowledge on privacy inference risks in machine learning. We use this framework to (1) provide a unifying structure for definitions of inference risks, (2) formally establish known relations among definitions, and (3) to uncover hitherto unknown relations that would have been difficult to spot otherwise. Index Terms—privacy, machine learning, differential privacy, membership inference, attribute inference, property inferencemore » « less
-
Machine learning deployment on edge devices has faced challenges such as computational costs and privacy issues. Membership inference attack (MIA) refers to the attack where the adversary aims to infer whether a data sample belongs to the training set. In other words, user data privacy might be compromised by MIA from a well-trained model. Therefore, it is vital to have defense mechanisms in place to protect training data, especially in privacy-sensitive applications such as healthcare. This paper exploits the implications of quantization on privacy leakage and proposes a novel quantization method that enhances the resistance of a neural network against MIA. Recent studies have shown that model quantization leads to resistance against membership inference attacks. Existing quantization approaches primarily prioritize performance and energy efficiency; we propose a quantization framework with the main objective of boosting the resistance against membership inference attacks. Unlike conventional quantization methods whose primary objectives are compression or increased speed, our proposed quantization aims to provide defense against MIA. We evaluate the effectiveness of our methods on various popular benchmark datasets and model architectures. All popular evaluation metrics, including precision, recall, and F1-score, show improvement when compared to the full bitwidth model. For example, for ResNet on Cifar10, our experimental results show that our algorithm can reduce the attack accuracy of MIA by 14%, the true positive rate by 37%, and F1-score of members by 39% compared to the full bitwidth network. Here, reduction in true positive rate means the attacker will not be able to identify the training dataset members, which is the main goal of the MIA.more » « less
-
Distribution inference, sometimes called property inference, infers statistical properties about a training set from access to a model trained on that data. Distribution inference attacks can pose serious risks when models are trained on private data, but are difficult to distinguish from the intrinsic purpose of statistical machine learning—namely, to produce models that capture statistical properties about a distribution. Motivated by Yeom et al.’s membership inference framework, we propose a formal definition of distribution inference attacks general enough to describe a broad class of attacks distinguishing between possible training distributions. We show how our definition captures previous ratio-based inference attacks as well as new kinds of attack including revealing the average node degree or clustering coefficient of training graphs. To understand distribution inference risks, we introduce a metric that quantifies observed leakage by relating it to the leakage that would occur if samples from the training distribution were provided directly to the adversary. We report on a series of experiments across a range of different distributions using both novel black-box attacks and improved versions of the state-of-the-art white-box attacks. Our results show that inexpensive attacks are often as effective as expensive meta-classifier attacks, and that there are surprising asymmetries in the effectiveness of attacks.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
