An official website of the United States government
Abstract ObjectivesLaboratory studies have yielded important insights into primate locomotor mechanics. Nevertheless, laboratory studies fail to capture the range of ecological and structural variation encountered by free‐ranging primates. We present techniques for collecting kinematic data on wild primates using consumer grade high‐speed cameras and demonstrate novel methods for quantifying metric variation in arboreal substrates. Materials and methodsThese methods were developed and applied to our research examining platyrrhine substrate use and locomotion at the Tiputini Biodiversity Station, Ecuador. Modified GoPro cameras equipped with varifocal zoom lenses provided high‐resolution footage (1080 p.; 120 fps) suitable for digitizing gait events. We tested two methods for remotely measuring branch diameter: the parallel laser method and the distance meter photogrammetric method. A forestry‐grade laser rangefinder was used to quantify substrate angle and a force gauge was used to measure substrate compliance. We also introduce GaitKeeper, a graphical user interface for MATLAB, designed for coding quadrupedal gait. ResultsParallel laser and distance meter methods provided accurate estimations of substrate diameter (percent error: 3.1–4.5%). The laser rangefinder yielded accurate estimations of substrate orientation (mean error = 2.5°). Compliance values varied tremendously among substrates but were largely explained by substrate diameter, substrate length, and distance of measurement point from trunk. On average, larger primates used relatively small substrates and traveled higher in the canopy. DiscussionUltimately, these methods will help researchers identify more precisely how primate gait kinematics respond to the complexity of arboreal habitats, furthering our understanding of the adaptive context in which primate quadrupedalism evolved.
more »
« less
Pump and sway: Wild primates use compliant supports as a tool to augment leaping in the canopy
Abstract ObjectivesDespite qualitative observations of wild primates pumping branches before leaping across gaps in the canopy, most studies have suggested that support compliance increases the energetic cost of arboreal leaping, thus limiting leaping performance. In this study, we quantified branch pumping behavior and tree swaying in wild primates to test the hypothesis that these behaviors improve leaping performance. Materials and MethodsWe recorded wild colobine monkeys crossing gaps in the canopy and quantitatively tracked the kinematics of both the monkey and the compliant support during behavioral sequences. We also empirically measured the compliance of a sample of locomotor supports in the monkeys' natural habitat, allowing us to quantify the resonant properties of substrates used during leaping. ResultsAnalyses of three recordings show that adult red colobus monkeys (Piliocolobus tephrosceles) use branch compliance to their advantage by actively pumping branches before leaping, augmenting their vertical velocity at take‐off. Quantitative modeling of branch resonance periods, based on empirical measurements of support compliance, suggests that monkeys specifically employed branch pumping on relatively thin branches with protracted periods of oscillation. Finally, an additional four recordings show that both red colobus and black and white colobus monkeys (Colobus guereza) utilize tree swaying to cross large gaps, augmenting horizontal velocity at take‐off. DiscussionThis deliberate branch manipulation to produce a mechanical effect for stronger propulsion is consistent with the framework of instrumental problem‐solving. To our knowledge, this is the first study of wild primates which quantitatively shows how compliant branches can be used advantageously to augment locomotor performance.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10507283
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Journal of Biological Anthropology
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- American Journal of Biological Anthropology
- ISSN:
- 2692-7691
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Several studies comparing primate locomotion under lab versus field conditions have shown the importance of implementing both types of studies, as each has their advantages and disadvantages. However, three‐dimensional (3D) motion capture of primates has been challenging under natural conditions. In this study, we provide a detailed protocol on how to collect 3D biomechanical data on primate leaping in their natural habitat that can be widely implemented. To record primate locomotion in the dense forest we use modified GoPro Hero Black cameras with zoom lenses that can easily be carried around and set up on tripods. We outline details on how to obtain camera calibrations at greater heights and how to process the collected data using the MATLAB camera calibration app and the motion tracking software DLTdv8a. We further developed a new MATLAB application “WildLeap3D” to generate biomechanical performance metrics from the derivedx,y,zcoordinates of the leaps. We provide details on how to collect data on support diameter, compliance, and orientation, and combine these with the jumps to study locomotor performance in an ecological context. We successfully reconstructed leaps of wild primates in the 3D space under natural conditions and provided data on four representative leaps. We provide exemplar data on primate velocity and acceleration during a leap and show how our protocol can be used to analyze segmental kinematics. This study will help to make motion capture of freely moving animals more accessible and help further our knowledge about animal locomotion and movement.more » « less
-
Abstract ObjectivesAn accident during arboreal locomotion can lead to risky falls, but it remains unclear that the extent to which primates, as adept arborealists, change their locomotion in response to the perceived risk of moving on high supports in the tree canopy. By using more stable forms of locomotion on higher substrates, primates might avoid potentially fatal consequences. Materials and MethodsUsing high‐speed cameras, we recorded the quadrupedal locomotion of four wild lemur species—Eulemur rubriventer,Eulemur rufifrons, Hapalemur aureus, and Lemur catta(N = 113 total strides). We quantified the height, diameter, and angular orientation of locomotor supports using remote sensors and tested the influence of support parameters on gait kinematics, specifically predicting that in response to increasing substrate height, lemurs would decrease speed and stride frequency, but increase stride length and the mean number of supporting limbs. ResultsLemurs did not adjust stride frequency on substrates of varying height. Adjustments to speed, stride length, and the mean number of supporting limbs in response to varying height often ran counter to predictions. OnlyE. rubriventerdecreased speed and increased the mean number of supporting limbs on higher substrates. DiscussionResults suggest that quadrupedal walking is a relatively safe form of locomotion for lemurs, requiring subtle changes in gait to increase stability on higher—that is, potentially riskier—substrates. Continued investigation of the impact of height on locomotion will be important to determine how animals assess risk in their environment and how they choose to use this information to move more safely.more » « less
-
Abstract Arboreal locomotion is precarious and places multiple challenges upon stability. Studies have shown that captive primates respond to narrower and steeper supports by flexing limb joints and adopting a compliant gait. We tested whether these same kinematic responses are adopted by wild primates freely ranging over a variety of supports in their natural habitats. We recorded five species of platyrrhines, five species of catarrhines, and four species of strepsirrhines with modified GoPro cameras and used remote measurement to quantify substrate characteristics. Video images were imported into ImageJ to measure the angular kinematics of limb joints during quadrupedal locomotion on a variety of arboreal supports. We statistically tested for associations between joint posture and substrate characteristics, and then disentangled the influence of phylogeny and substrate on limb joint kinematics using variation partitioning and redundancy analysis. Our results partially confirm previous kinematic studies and suggest variation in support orientation, more than diameter or compliance, influences quadrupedal gait kinematics. Phylogenetic relatedness explained more variation in the data than substrate properties. This suggests primates either prospectively choose relatively ‘safe’ substrates for locomotion, or that they possess locomotor adaptations independent of limb joint kinematics per se to overcome the challenges of the precarious arboreal environment.more » « less
-
Abstract The grasping capabilities and gait kinematics characteristic of primates are often argued to be adaptations for safely moving on small terminal branches. The goal of this study was to identify whether Eastern gray squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis)—arboreal rodents that frequently move and forage on small branches, lack primate‐like grasping and gait patterns, and arguably represent extant analogs of a stem primate ancestor—adjust gait kinematics to narrow and nonhorizontal branches. We studied locomotor kinematics of free‐ranging and laboratory‐housed squirrels moving over various substrates. We used high‐speed video to film (a) a population of free‐ranging squirrels moving on natural substrates and (b) laboratory‐housed squirrels moving on horizontal poles. Substrates were coded as small, medium, or large relative to squirrel trunk diameter, and as inclined, declined, or horizontal. Free‐ranging squirrels used more gallops and half‐bounds on small‐ and medium‐sized substrates, and more high‐impact bounds, with reduced limb‐lead durations, on declined substrates. Laboratory squirrels moved at higher speeds than free‐ranging squirrels and responded to decreasing diameter by using more gallops and half‐bounds, lowering speed, and—controlling for speed—increasing mean duty factor, mean number of supporting limbs, and relative forelimb lead duration. Our inability to detect substantial diameter or orientation‐related gait adjustments in the wild may be due to a limited accounting of confounding influences (e.g., substrate compliance). Ultimately, studies assessing stability measures (e.g., center of mass fluctuations and peak vertical force) are required to assess whether primates' enhanced grasping and gait patterns engender performance advantages on narrow or oblique substrates.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24914
