Abstract Fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy (FFS) encompasses a bevy of techniques that involve analyzing fluorescence intensity fluctuations occurring due to fluorescently labeled molecules diffusing in and out of a microscope's focal region. Statistical analysis of these fluctuations may reveal the oligomerization (i.e., association) state of said molecules. We have recently developed a new FFS‐based method, termed Two‐Dimensional Fluorescence Intensity Fluctuation (2D FIF) spectrometry, which provides quantitative information on the size and stability of protein oligomers as a function of receptor concentration. This article describes protocols for employing FIF spectrometry to quantify the oligomerization of a membrane protein of interest, with specific instructions regarding cell preparation, image acquisition, and analysis of images given in detail. Application of the FIF Spectrometry Suite, a software package designed for applying FIF analysis on fluorescence images, is emphasized in the protocol. Also discussed in detail is the identification, removal, and/or analysis of inhomogeneous regions of the membrane that appear as bright spots. The 2D FIF approach is particularly suited to assess the effects of agonists and antagonists on the oligomeric size of membrane receptors of interest. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of live cells expressing protein constructs Basic Protocol 2: Image acquisition and noise correction Basic Protocol 3: Drawing and segmenting regions of interest Basic Protocol 4: Calculating the molecular brightness and concentration of individual image segments Basic Protocol 5: Combining data subsets using a manual procedure (Optional) Alternate Protocol 1: Combining data subsets using the advanced FIF spectrometry suite (Optional; alternative to Basic Protocol 5) Basic Protocol 6: Performing meta‐analysis of brightness spectrograms Alternate Protocol 2: Performing meta‐analysis of brightness spectrograms (alternative to Basic Protocol 6) Basic Protocol 7: Spot extraction and analysis using a manual procedure or by writing a program (Optional) Alternate Protocol 3: Automated spot extraction and analysis (Optional; alternative to Protocol 7) Support Protocol: Monomeric brightness determination
more »
« less
Adaptation of CUT&RUN for use in African trypanosomes
This Cleavage Under Targets and Release Using Nuclease (CUT&RUN) protocol produces genomic occupancy data for a protein of interest in the protozoan parasiteTrypanosoma brucei. The data produced is analyzed in a similar way as that produced by ChIP-seq. While we describe the protocol for parasites carrying an epitope tag for the protein of interest, antibodies against the native protein could be used for the same purpose.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2041395
- PAR ID:
- 10507576
- Editor(s):
- Li, Zhiming
- Publisher / Repository:
- PLoS
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- PLOS ONE
- Volume:
- 18
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 1932-6203
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- e0292784
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Histone acetyltransferases (HATs, also known as lysine acetyltransferases, KATs) catalyze acetylation of their cognate protein substrates using acetyl‐CoA (Ac‐CoA) as a cofactor and are involved in various physiological and pathological processes. Advances in mass spectrometry‐based proteomics have allowed the discovery of thousands of acetylated proteins and the specific acetylated lysine sites. However, due to the rapid dynamics and functional redundancy of HAT activities, and the limitation of using antibodies to capture acetylated lysines, it is challenging to systematically and precisely define both the substrates and sites directly acetylated by a given HAT. Here, we describe a chemoproteomic approach to identify and profile protein substrates of individual HAT enzymes on the proteomic scale. The approach involves protein engineering to enlarge the Ac‐CoA binding pocket of the HAT of interest, such that a mutant form is generated that can use functionalized acyl‐CoAs as a cofactor surrogate to bioorthogonally label its protein substrates. The acylated protein substrates can then be chemoselectively conjugated either with a fluorescent probe (for imaging detection) or with a biotin handle (for streptavidin pulldown and chemoproteomic identification). This modular chemical biology approach has been successfully implemented to identify protein substrates of p300, GCN5, and HAT1, and it is expected that this method can be applied to profile and identify the sub‐acetylomes of many other HAT enzymes. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Labeling HAT protein substrates with azide/alkyne‐biotin Alternate Protocol: Labeling protein substrates of HATs with azide/alkyne‐TAMRA for in‐gel visualization Support Protocol 1: Expression and purification of HAT mutants Support Protocol 2: Synthesis of Ac‐CoA surrogates Basic Protocol 2: Streptavidin enrichment of biotinylated HAT substrates Basic Protocol 3: Chemoproteomic identification of HAT substrates Basic Protocol 4: Validation of specific HAT substrates with western blottingmore » « less
-
Abstract FlyBase (www.flybase.org) is the primary online database of genetic, genomic, and functional information aboutDrosophila melanogaster. The long and rich history ofDrosophilaresearch, combined with recent surges in genomic‐scale and high‐throughput technologies, means that FlyBase now houses a huge quantity of data. Researchers need to be able to query these data rapidly and intuitively, and the QuickSearch tool has been designed to meet these needs. This tool is conveniently located on the FlyBase homepage and is organized into a series of simple tabbed interfaces that cover the major data and annotation classes within the database. This article describes the functionality of all aspects of the QuickSearch tool. With this knowledge, FlyBase users will be equipped to take full advantage of all QuickSearch features and thereby gain improved access to data relevant to their research. © 2023 The Authors. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Using the “Search FlyBase” tab of QuickSearch Basic Protocol 2: Using the “Data Class” tab of QuickSearch Basic Protocol 3: Using the “References” tab of QuickSearch Basic Protocol 4: Using the “Gene Groups” tab of QuickSearch Basic Protocol 5: Using the “Pathways” tab of QuickSearch Basic Protocol 6: Using the “GO” tab of QuickSearch Basic Protocol 7: Using the “Protein Domains” tab of QuickSearch Basic Protocol 8: Using the “Expression” tab of QuickSearch Basic Protocol 9: Using the “GAL4 etc” tab of QuickSearch Basic Protocol 10: Using the “Phenotype” tab of QuickSearch Basic Protocol 11: Using the “Human Disease” tab of QuickSearch Basic Protocol 12: Using the “Homologs” tab of QuickSearch Support Protocol 1: Managing FlyBase hit listsmore » « less
-
Abstract Extracellular vesicles (EVs) in plants have emerged as key players in cell‐to‐cell communication and cross‐kingdom RNAi between plants and pathogens by facilitating the exchange of RNA, proteins, and other molecules. In addition to their role in intercellular communication, plant EVs also show promise as potential therapeutics and indicators of plant health. However, plant EVs exhibit significant heterogeneity in their protein markers, size, and biogenesis pathways, strongly influencing their composition and functionality. While mammalian EVs can be generally classified as exosomes that are derived from multivesicular bodies (MVBs), microvesicles that are shed from the plasma membrane, or as apoptotic bodies that originate from cells undergoing apoptosis, plant EVs remain poorly studied in comparison. At least three subclasses of EVs have been identified inArabidopsisleaves to date, including Tetraspanin‐positive exosomes derived from MVBs, Penetration 1 (PEN1)‐positive EVs, and EVs derived from exocyst‐positive organelles (EXPO). Differences in the plant starting material and isolation techniques have resulted in different purities, quality, and compositions of the resulting EVs, complicating efforts to better understand the role of these EVs in plants. We performed a comparative analysis on commonly used plant EV isolation methods and have identified an effective protocol for extracting clean apoplastic washing fluid (AWF) and isolating high‐quality intact and pure EVs ofArabidopsis thaliana. These EVs can then be used for various applications or studied to assess their cargos and functionality in plants. Furthermore, this process can be easily adapted to other plant species of interest. © 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Isolation of EVs from the apoplastic fluid ofArabidopsis thaliana Basic Protocol 2: Density gradient fractionation of EVs Basic Protocol 3: Immuno‐isolation of EVs usingArabidopsistetraspanin 8 (TET8) antibodymore » « less
-
D’Auria, Sabato (Ed.)Biolayer interferometry (BLI) is a widely utilized technique for determining macromolecular interaction dynamics in real time. Using changes in the interference pattern of white light reflected off a biosensor tip, BLI can determine binding parameters for protein-protein ( e . g ., antibody-substrate kinetics) or protein-small molecule ( e . g ., drug discovery) interactions. However, a less-appreciated application for BLI analysis is DNA-protein interactions. DNA-binding proteins play an immense role in cellular biology, controlling critical processes including transcription, DNA replication, and DNA repair. Understanding how proteins interact with DNA often provides important insight into their biological function, and novel technologies to assay DNA-protein interactions are of broad interest. Currently, a detailed protocol utilizing BLI for DNA-protein interactions is lacking. In the following protocol, we describe the use of BLI and biotinylated-DNA probes to determine the binding kinetics of a transcription factor to a specific DNA sequence. The experimental steps include the generation of biotinylated-DNA probes, the execution of the BLI experiment, and data analysis by scientific graphing and statistical software ( e . g ., GraphPad Prism). Although the example experiment used throughout this protocol involves a prokaryotic transcription factor, this technique can be easily translated to any DNA-binding protein. Pitfalls and potential solutions for investigating DNA-binding proteins by BLI are also presented.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

