An official website of the United States government
SUMMARY Mantle plumes form from thermal boundary layers, such as Earth's core–mantle boundary. As plumes rise towards the surface, they are laterally deflected by the surrounding mantle flow that is governed by deep mantle density and viscosity structures. The lateral motions of mantle plumes carry information of deep mantle structure and dynamics and are used to setup reference frames by which absolute plate motions are reconstructed. In this study, we compare two methods to compute deep mantle flow and lateral motion of plumes. In mantle convection (MC) models, the mantle flow field and lateral motions of plumes are determined by solving conservation equations forward-in-time from given initial conditions. In plume advection (PA) models, approximate viscosity and present-day density structures are used to calculate present-day mantle flow which is then propagated backward-in-time assuming zero thermal diffusion, and plume conduits are represented by continuous lines and are passively advected within the background mantle flow. The question is how assumptions in PA models influence the predictions of deep mantle flow and plume lateral motions. Here, we perform purely thermal MC models and thermochemical MC models with intrinsically dense materials in the lowermost mantle. The deep mantle flow and plume lateral motions are determined accurately in each MC model. We also perform PA models using the approximated present-day viscosity and temperature structures in these MC models. We find that PA models without considering temperature-dependence of viscosity and/or only using long wavelength present-day temperature structure (up to degree 20) often lead to an average of ∼50–60 per cent and ∼60–200 per cent differences of present-day mantle flow velocities than purely thermal MC models and thermochemical MC models, respectively. By propagating inaccurate flow fields backward-in-time in PA models often cause even larger errors of mantle flow velocities in the past. Even using the same parameters and starting from the same present-day mantle flow fields as in MC models, the PA models still show an average of ∼10–30 per cent misfit of mantle flow velocities after ∼40 Ma. In addition, we show that errors of mantle flow fields in PA models can cause ∼100–600 per cent differences of plume lateral motions than that constrained in MC models in the past 60 Ma. Even we use the mantle flow in MC models to advected virtual plumes in PA models, the virtual plumes could still show ∼50–300 per cent difference of lateral motions than dynamic plumes in MC models if the virtual plumes do not start with the same locations and/or shapes as plumes in MC models. We also find virtual plumes in PA models initiated at different locations and/or with different shapes can be later advected to similar locations, suggesting that the lateral motions of plumes in PA models can be non-unique. Therefore, it is important to consider the build-in assumptions of PA models when interpreting their predictions on deep mantle flow field and plume lateral motions. The accuracy of PA models would improve as we gain better understanding on Earth's deep mantle structure and dynamics.
more »
« less
A Synoptic View of Mantle Plume Shapes Enabled by Virtual Reality
Abstract The shapes of mantle plumes are sensitive to mantle viscosity, density structure, and flow patterns. Increasingly, global tomographic models reveal broad plume conduits in the lower mantle and highly tilting conduits in the mid and upper mantle. Previous studies mostly relied on 2D slices to analyze plume shapes, but fully investigating the complexity of 3D plume structures requires more effective visualization methods. Here, we use immersive headset‐based virtual reality (VR) to visualize the full‐waveform global tomographic models SEMUCB‐WM1 and GLAD‐M25. We develop criteria for the identification of plume conduits based on the relationship between the plume excess temperature and theVSanomaly (δVS). We trace 20 major plume conduits, measure the offsets of the conduits in azimuth and distance with respect to the hotspots, calculate the tilt angle, and evaluate theδVSalong all traced conduits. We compare our traced conduits with the conduits predicted by global mantle convection models and vertical conduits. The wavespeed variations along conduits traced from each tomographic model are slower than modeled or vertical conduits, regardless of which tomographic model they are evaluated in. The shapes of traced conduits tend to differ greatly from modeled conduits. Plume ponding and the emergence of secondary plumes, which could result from a combination of compositional variations, phase transitions, small‐scale convection, and variations in viscosity, can contribute to the complex observed plume shapes. The variation ofδVSalong the traced conduits and complex plume shapes suggest a thermochemical origin of many plumes.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10518246
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
- Volume:
- 25
- Issue:
- 6
- ISSN:
- 1525-2027
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
It is well established that mantle plumes are the main conduits for upwelling geochemically enriched material from Earth's deep interior. The fashion and extent to which lateral flow processes at shallow depths may disperse enriched mantle material far (>1,000 km) from vertical plume conduits, however, remain poorly constrained. Here, we report He and C isotope data from 65 hydrothermal fluids from the southern Central America Margin (CAM) which reveal strikingly high 3 He/ 4 He (up to 8.9R A ) in low-temperature (≤50 °C) geothermal springs of central Panama that are not associated with active volcanism. Following radiogenic correction, these data imply a mantle source 3 He/ 4 He >10.3R A (and potentially up to 26R A , similar to Galápagos hotspot lavas) markedly greater than the upper mantle range (8 ± 1R A ). Lava geochemistry (Pb isotopes, Nb/U, and Ce/Pb) and geophysical constraints show that high 3 He/ 4 He values in central Panama are likely derived from the infiltration of a Galápagos plume–like mantle through a slab window that opened ∼8 Mya. Two potential transport mechanisms can explain the connection between the Galápagos plume and the slab window: 1) sublithospheric transport of Galápagos plume material channeled by lithosphere thinning along the Panama Fracture Zone or 2) active upwelling of Galápagos plume material blown by a “mantle wind” toward the CAM. We present a model of global mantle flow that supports the second mechanism, whereby most of the eastward transport of Galápagos plume material occurs in the shallow asthenosphere. These findings underscore the potential for lateral mantle flow to transport mantle geochemical heterogeneities thousands of kilometers away from plume conduits.more » « less
-
Abstract The Earth's long‐ and intermediate‐wavelength geoid anomalies are surface expressions of mantle convection and are sensitive to mantle viscosity. While previous studies of the geoid provide important constraints on the mantle radial viscosity variations, the mantle buoyancy in these studies, as derived from either seismic tomography or slab density models, may suffer significant uncertainties. In this study, we formulate 3‐D spherical mantle convection models with plate motion history since the Cretaceous that generate dynamically self‐consistent mantle thermal and buoyancy structures, and for the first time, use the dynamically generated slab structures and the observed geoid to place important constraints on the mantle viscosity. We found that non‐uniform weak plate margins and strong plate interiors are critical in reproducing the observed geoid and surface plate motion, especially the net lithosphere rotation (i.e., degree‐1 toroidal plate motion). In the best‐fit model, which leads to correlation of 0.61 between the modeled and observed geoid at degrees 4–12, the lower mantle viscosity is ∼1.3–2.5 × 1022 Pa⋅s and is ∼30 and ∼600–1,000 times higher than that in the transition zone and asthenosphere, respectively. Slab structures and the geoid are also strongly affected by slab strength, and the observations prefer moderately strong slabs that are ∼10–100 times stronger than the ambient mantle. Finally, a thin weak layer below the 670‐km phase change on a regional scale only in subduction zones produces stagnant slabs in the mantle transition zone as effectively as a weak layer on a global scale.more » « less
-
Abstract Mantle plumes are typically considered secondary features of mantle convection, yet their surface effects over Earth's evolution may have been significant. We use 2‐D convection models to show that mantle plumes can in fact cause the termination of a subduction zone. This extreme case of plume‐slab interaction is found when the slab is readily weakened, for example, by damage‐type rheology, and the subducting slab is young. We posit that this mechanism may be relevant, particularly for the early Earth, and a subdued version of these plume‐slab interactions may remain relevant for modern subduction zones. Such core‐mantle boundary–surface interactions may be behind some of the complexity of tomographically imaged mantle structures, for example, in South America. More generally, plume “talk back” to subduction zones may make plate tectonics more episodic.more » « less
-
Abstract The effect of mantle plumes is secondary to that of subducting slabs for modern plate tectonics when considering plate driving forces. However, the impact of plumes on tectonics and planetary surface evolution may nonetheless have been significant. We use numerical mantle convection models in a 3‐D spherical chunk geometry with damage rheology to study some of the dynamics of plume‐slab interactions. Substantiating our earlier 2‐D results, we observe a range of interaction scenarios, and that the plume‐driven subduction terminations we had identified earlier persist in more realistic convective flow. We analyze the dynamics of plume affected subduction, including in terms of their geometry, frequency, and the overall effect of plumes on surface dynamics as a function of the fraction of internal to bottom heating. Some versions of such plume‐slab interplay may be relevant for geologic events, for example, for the inferred ∼183 Ma Karoo large igneous province formation and associated slab disruption. More recent examples may include the impingement of the Afar plume underneath Africa leading to disruption of the Hellenic slab, and the current complex structure imaged for the subduction of the Nazca plate under South America. Our results imply that plumes may play a significant role not just in kick‐starting plate tectonics, but also in major modifications of slab‐driven plate motions, including for the present‐day mantle.more » « less
