Convergent cross-mapping (CCM) has attracted increased attention recently due to its capability to detect causality in nonseparable systems under deterministic settings, which may not be covered by the traditional Granger causality. From an information-theoretic perspective, causality is often characterized as the directed information (DI) flowing from one side to the other. As information is essentially nondeterministic, a natural question is: does CCM measure DI flow? Here, we first causalize CCM so that it aligns with the presumption in causality analysis—the future values of one process cannot influence the past of the other, and then establish and validate the approximate equivalence of causalized CCM (cCCM) and DI under Gaussian variables through both theoretical derivations and fMRI-based brain network causality analysis. Our simulation result indicates that, in general, cCCM tends to be more robust than DI in causality detection. The underlying argument is that DI relies heavily on probability estimation, which is sensitive to data size as well as digitization procedures; cCCM, on the other hand, gets around this problem through geometric cross-mapping between the manifolds involved. Overall, our analysis demonstrates that cross-mapping provides an alternative way to evaluate DI and is potentially an effective technique for identifying both linear and nonlinear causal coupling in brain neural networks and other settings, either random or deterministic, or both.
This content will become publicly available on July 1, 2025
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10522387
- Publisher / Repository:
- MDPI
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Entropy
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 7
- ISSN:
- 1099-4300
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 539
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abbott, Derek (Ed.)
Abstract -
Objective: Inferring causal or effective connectivity between measured timeseries is crucial to understanding directed interactions in complex systems. This task is especially challenging in the brain as the underlying dynamics are not well-understood. This paper aims to introduce a novel causality measure called frequency-domain convergent cross-mapping (FDCCM) that utilizes frequency-domain dynamics through nonlinear state-space reconstruction. Method: Using synthesized chaotic timeseries, we investigate general applicability of FDCCM at different causal strengths and noise levels. We also apply our method on two resting-state Parkinson's datasets with 31 and 54 subjects, respectively. To this end, we construct causal networks, extract network features, and perform machine learning analysis to distinguish Parkinson's disease patients (PD) from age and gender-matched healthy controls (HC). Specifically, we use the FDCCM networks to compute the betweenness centrality of the network nodes, which act as features for the classification models. Result: The analysis on simulated data showed that FDCCM is resilient to additive Gaussian noise, making it suitable for real-world applications. Our proposed method also decodes scalp-EEG signals to classify the PD and HC groups with approximately 97% leave-one-subject-out cross-validation accuracy. We compared decoders from six cortical regions to find that features derived from the left temporal lobe lead to a higher classification accuracy of 84.5% compared to other regions. Moreover, when the classifier trained using FDCCM networks from one dataset was tested on an independent out-of-sample dataset, it attained an accuracy of 84%. This accuracy is significantly higher than correlational networks (45.2%) and CCM networks (54.84%). Significance: These findings suggest that our spectral-based causality measure can improve classification performance and reveal useful network biomarkers of Parkinson's disease.more » « less
-
Abstract Natural systems exhibit diverse behavior generated by complex interactions between their constituent parts. To characterize these interactions, we introduce Convergent Cross Sorting (CCS), a novel algorithm based on convergent cross mapping (CCM) for estimating dynamic coupling from time series data. CCS extends CCM by using the relative ranking of distances within state-space reconstructions to improve the prior methods’ performance at identifying the existence, relative strength, and directionality of coupling across a wide range of signal and noise characteristics. In particular, relative to CCM, CCS has a large performance advantage when analyzing very short time series data and data from continuous dynamical systems with synchronous behavior. This advantage allows CCS to better uncover the temporal and directional relationships within systems that undergo frequent and short-lived switches in dynamics, such as neural systems. In this paper, we validate CCS on simulated data and demonstrate its applicability to electrophysiological recordings from interacting brain regions.more » « less
-
Dr. Wing-Kin (Ed.)Convergent cross mapping is a principled causal discovery technique for signals, but its efficacy depends on a number of assumptions about the systems that generated the signals. We present a self-contained introduction to the theory of causality in state-space models, Takens’ theorem, and cross maps, and we propose conditions to check if a signal is appropriate for cross mapping. Further, we propose simple analyses based on Gaussian processes to test for these conditions in data. We show that our proposed techniques detect when convergent cross mapping may conclude erroneous results using several examples from the literature, and we comment on other considerations that are important when applying methods such as convergent cross mapping.more » « less
-
Abstract As drought and wildfire frequency increase across the western United States, our ability to predict how water resources will respond to these disturbances depends on our understanding of the feedbacks that maintain watershed function and streamflow. Previous studies of non‐perennial headwater streams have ranked drivers of low‐flow conditions; however, there is a limited understanding of the interactions between these drivers and the processes through which these interactions affect streamflow. Here, we use stream water level, soil moisture, sap flow, and vapor pressure deficit data to investigate ecohydrological interactions along a mountainous headwater stream. Correlation and cross‐correlation analyses of these variables show that ecohydrological interactions are (a) nonlinear and (b) interconnected, suggesting that analyses assuming linearity and independence of each driver are inadequate for quantifying these interactions. To account for these issues and investigate causal linkages, we use convergent cross‐mapping (CCM) to characterize the feedbacks that influence non‐perennial streamflow. CCM is a nonlinear, dynamic method that has only recently been applied to hydrologic systems. CCM results reveal that atmospheric losses associated with local sap flow and vapor pressure deficit are driving changes in soil moisture and streamflow (
p < 0.01) and that atmospheric losses influence stream water more directly than shallow soil moisture. These results also demonstrate that riparian processes continue to affect subsurface flows in the channel corridor even after stream drying. This study proposes a nonlinear framework for quantifying the ecohydrologic interactions that may determine how headwater streams respond to disturbance.