skip to main content

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 11:00 PM ET on Friday, December 13 until 2:00 AM ET on Saturday, December 14 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: Creation and Characterization of Design Spaces
Designers advance in the design processes by creating and expanding the design space where the solution they develop unfolds. This process requires the co- evolution of the problem and the solution spaces through design state changes. In this paper, we provide a methodology to capture how designers create, structure and expand their design space across time. Design verbalizations from a team of three professional engineers are coded into design elements from the Function-Behavior- Structure ontology to identify the characteristics of design state changes. Three types of changes can occur: a change within the problem space, a change within the solution space or a change between the problem and the solution spaces or inversely. The paper explores how to represent such changes by generating a network of design concepts. By tracking the evolution of the design space over time, we represent how the design space expands as the design activity progresses.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1762415
PAR ID:
10525631
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Editor(s):
Lockton, Dan; Lenzi, Sara
Publisher / Repository:
DRS
Date Published:
ISSN:
9780367772000
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1-15;
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
design spaces teams first occurrences
Format(s):
Medium: X
Location:
Bibao, Spain
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Co-evolution accounts have generally been used to describe how problems and solutions both change during the design process. More generally, problems and solutions can be considered as analytic categories, where change is seen to occur within categories or across categories. There are more categories of interest than just problems and solutions, for example, the participants in a design process (such as members of a design team or different design teams) and categories defined by design ontologies (such as function-behaviour-structure or concept-knowledge). In this paper, we consider the co-evolution of different analytic categories (not just problems and solutions), by focussing on how changes to a category originate either from inside or outside that category. We then illustrate this approach by applying it to data from a single design session using three different systems of categorisation (problems and solutions, different designers and function, behaviour and structure). This allows us to represent the reciprocal influence of change within and between these different categories, while using a common notation and common approach to graphing quantitative data. Our approach demonstrates how research traditions that are currently distinct from each other (such as co-evolution, collaboration and function-behaviour-structure) can be connected by a single analytic approach. 
    more » « less
  2. Creative outcomes require designers to continuously frame the problem space and generate solutions, resulting in the co-evolution of problem and solution. Little work has addressed the value dimensions of design activity with regard to this co-evolutionary process and the role of the designer in acting upon specific and value-laden framings and/or solutions. In this paper, we identify how triads of student designers from user experience (UX) and industrial engineering (IE) disciplines frame the problem space and generate solutions, foregrounding the ethical character of their judgments in response to an ethically-nuanced design task. Using sequence analysis to analyze the lab protocol data, we describe the frequency and interconnectedness of process moves that lead the design team towards unethical outcomes. Based on our findings, we call for additional attention to ethical dimensions of problem-solution co-evolution, and identify key interaction patterns among designers that lead towards unethical outcomes. 
    more » « less
  3. Building facades are components that shape a structure’s daylighting, energy use, and view factors. This paper presents an approach that enables designers to understand the impact that different facade designs will have over time and space in the built environment through a BIM-enabled augmented reality system. The system permits the examination of a range of facade retrofit scenarios and visualizes the daylighting simulations and aesthetics of a structure while retaining function and comfort. A focus of our study was to measure how participants make decisions within the multiobjective decision space designers often face when buildings undergo retrofitting. This process often requires designers to search for a set of alternatives that represent the optimal solution. We analyze the decision-making process of forty-four subjects to determine how they explore design choices. Our results indicate the feasibility of using BIM-enabled AR to improve how designers make informed decisions. 
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    The Metaverse, a term coined in science fiction, is now being discussed seriously as a new form of infra-structure. The Metaverse is intended to make possible thematically interconnected immersive experiences. In this paper, we conceptualize the Metaverse as a meta design space. Within this space, designers create var-ious interconnected design spaces. We highlight how the key dimensions of human experience (time, space, actors, and artifacts) each introduce tensions for making decisions in those design spaces, and we highlight the transitions between design spaces. This conceptual language opens up this novel and emergent phenomenon both to those wishing to design new disruptive technologies and those seeking to improve existing platform strategies. We conclude by highlighting how the Metaverse will not only comprise immersive virtual experiences but also transitions between physical and virtual experiences. 
    more » « less
  5. Boujet, J-F (Ed.)
    Design space is a common abstraction in design research used in the investigation of design cognition. Although its usefulness has been alleged and has contributed to the knowledge about designing, characteristics and properties of design spaces and how they change while designing are underexplored. Creativity has been recognized as an essential skill for changing the design space from constrained to open spaces. We analyzed the brain activity of designers while performing constrained and open design tasks. This study investigates the neurophysiological activations of professional mechanical engineers and industrial designers in two prototypical design tasks, a problem-solving constrained layout task and an open design sketching task. The analysis focused on comparing the neurophysiological activations of the cognitive demand in three stages of categorical similarity of designing in constrained and open design spaces. Results indicate significant differences of frequency bands activations between stages of the design spaces across and between domains. In particular, the stage of reflecting evoked visual imagination and associative reasoning modes and revealed significant differences in beta bands from the problem-solving stage leading to expanded activation in the sketching stage, which translates in higher activation in the open design task with significant differences in upper alpha and beta bands. We propose the neurophysiological activations as a measure of the pliability of design spaces. 
    more » « less