skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Where Dust Comes From: Global Assessment of Dust Source Attributions With AeroCom Models
Abstract The source of dust in the global atmosphere is an important factor to better understand the role of dust aerosols in the climate system. However, it is a difficult task to attribute the airborne dust over the remote land and ocean regions to their origins since dust from various sources are mixed during long‐range transport. Recently, a multi‐model experiment, namely the AeroCom‐III Dust Source Attribution (DUSA), has been conducted to estimate the relative contribution of dust in various locations from different sources with tagged simulations from seven participating global models. The BASE run and a series of runs with nine tagged regions were made to estimate the contribution of dust emitted in East‐ and West‐Africa, Middle East, Central‐ and East‐Asia, North America, the Southern Hemisphere, and the prominent dust hot spots of the Bodélé and Taklimakan Deserts. The models generally agree in large scale mean dust distributions, however models show large diversity in dust source attribution. The inter‐model differences are significant with the global model dust diversity in 30%–50%, but the differences in regional and seasonal scales are even larger. The multi‐model analysis estimates that North Africa contributes 60% of global atmospheric dust loading, followed by Middle East and Central Asia sources (24%). Southern hemispheric sources account for 10% of global dust loading, however it contributes more than 70% of dust over the Southern Hemisphere. The study provides quantitative estimates of the impact of dust emitted from different source regions on the globe and various receptor regions including remote land, ocean, and the polar regions synthesized from the seven models.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1856389 2151093
PAR ID:
10546044
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Kim_JGR_2024
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Volume:
129
Issue:
16
ISSN:
2169-897X
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
    Abstract. Even though desert dust is the most abundant aerosol bymass in Earth's atmosphere, the relative contributions of the world's majorsource regions to the global dust cycle remain poorly constrained. Thisproblem hinders accounting for the potentially large impact of regionaldifferences in dust properties on clouds, the Earth's energy balance, andterrestrial and marine biogeochemical cycles. Here, we constrain thecontribution of each of the world's main dust source regions to the globaldust cycle. We use an analytical framework that integrates an ensemble ofglobal aerosol model simulations with observationally informed constraintson the dust size distribution, extinction efficiency, and regional dustaerosol optical depth (DAOD). We obtain a dataset that constrains therelative contribution of nine major source regions to size-resolveddust emission, atmospheric loading, DAOD, concentration, and depositionflux. We find that the 22–29 Tg (1 standard error range) global loading ofdust with a geometric diameter up to 20 µm is partitioned as follows:North African source regions contribute ∼ 50 % (11–15 Tg),Asian source regions contribute ∼ 40 % (8–13 Tg), and NorthAmerican and Southern Hemisphere regions contribute ∼ 10 %(1.8–3.2 Tg). These results suggest that current models on averageoverestimate the contribution of North African sources to atmospheric dustloading at ∼ 65 %, while underestimating the contribution ofAsian dust at ∼ 30 %. Our results further show that eachsource region's dust loading peaks in local spring and summer, which ispartially driven by increased dust lifetime in those seasons. We alsoquantify the dust deposition flux to the Amazon rainforest to be∼ 10 Tg yr−1, which is a factor of 2–3 less than inferred fromsatellite data by previous work that likely overestimated dust deposition byunderestimating the dust mass extinction efficiency. The data obtained inthis paper can be used to obtain improved constraints on dust impacts onclouds, climate, biogeochemical cycles, and other parts of the Earth system. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Oceans are, generally, relatively weak sources of ice nucleating particles (INPs). Thus, dust transported from terrestrial regions can dominate atmospheric INP concentrations even in remote marine regions. Studies of ocean‐emitted INPs have focused upon sea spray aerosols containing biogenic species. Even though large concentrations of dust are transported over marine regions, resuspended dust has never been explicitly considered as another possible source of ocean‐emitted INPs. Current models assume that deposited dust is not re‐emitted from surface waters. Our laboratory studies of aerosol particles produced from coastal seawater and synthetic seawater doped with dust show that dust can indeed be ejected from water during bubble bursting. INP concentration measurements show these ejected dust particles retain ice nucleating activity. Doping synthetic seawater to simulate a strong dust deposition event produced INPs active at temperatures colder than −13°C and INP concentrations 1 to 2 orders of magnitude greater than either lab sea spray or marine boundary layer measurements. The relevance of these laboratory findings is highlighted by single‐particle composition measurements along the Californian coast where at least 9% of dust particles were mixed with sea salt. Additionally, global modeling studies show that resuspension of dust from the ocean could exert the most impact over the Southern Ocean, where ocean‐emitted INPs are thought to dominate atmospheric INP populations. More work characterizing the factors governing the resuspension of dust particles is required to understand the potential impact upon clouds. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract. The Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region is the dustiestregion in the world, and understanding the projected changes in the dustconcentrations in the region is crucial. Stratospheric aerosolinjection (SAI) geoengineering aims to reduce global warming by increasingthe reflection of a small amount of the incoming solar radiation to space,hence reducing the global surface temperatures. Using the output fromthe Geoengineering Large Ensemble Project (GLENS), we show areduction in the dust concentration in the MENA region under both the globalwarming (RCP8.5) and GLENS-SAI scenarios compared to the present-dayclimate. This reduction in dust over the whole MENA region is stronger underthe SAI scenario, except over dust hotspots and for the dry season. In otherwords, in the summer, with the strongest dust events, more reduction has beenprojected for the global warming scenario compared to the SAI scenario.The maximum reduction in the dust concentrations in the MENA region (underboth global warming and SAI) is due to the weakening of the dusthotspot emissions from the sources of the Middle East. Further analysis ofthe differences in the surface temperature, soil water, precipitation, leafarea index and near-surface wind speed provides some insights into theunderlying physical mechanisms that determine the changes in the future dustconcentrations in the MENA region. Detailed correlation analysis over dusthotspots indicates that lower future dust concentrations are controlled bylower wind speed and higher precipitation in these regions under boththe RCP8.5 and SAI scenarios. 
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    Global hydroclimatic changes from 1950 to 2018 are analyzed using updated data of land precipitation, streamfow, and an improved form of the Palmer Drought Severity Index. The historical changes are then compared with climate model-simulated response to external forcing to determine how much of the recent change is forced response. It is found that precipitation has increased from 1950 to 2018 over mid-high latitude Eurasia, most North America, Southeast South America, and Northwest Australia, while it has decreased over most Africa, eastern Australia, the Mediterranean region, the Middle East, and parts of East Asia, central South America, and the Pacifc coasts of Canada. Streamfow records largely confrm these precipitation changes. The wetting trend over Northwest Australia and Southeast South America is most pronounced in austral summer while the drying over Africa and wetting trend over mid-high latitude Eurasia are seen in all seasons. Coupled with the drying caused by rising surface temperatures, these precipitation changes have greatly increased the risk of drought over Africa, southern Europe, East Asia, eastern Australia, Northwest Canada, and southern Brazil. Global land precipitation and continental freshwater discharge show large interannual and inter-decadal variations, with negative anomalies during El Niño and following major volcanic eruptions in 1963, 1982, and 1991; whereas their decadal variations are correlated with the Interdecadal Pacifc Oscillation (IPO) with IPO’s warm phase associated with low land precipitation and continental discharge. The IPO and Atlantic multidecadal variability also dominate multidecadal variations in land aridity, accounting for 90% of the multidecadal variance. CMIP5 multi-model ensemble mean shows decreased precipitation and runoff and increased risk of drought during 1950–2018 over Southwest North America, Central America, northern and central South America (including the Amazon), southern and West Africa, the Mediterranean region, and Southeast Asia; while the northern mid-high latitudes, Southeast South America, and Northwest Australia see increased precipitation and runoff. The consistent spatial patterns between the observed changes and the model-simulated response suggest that many of the observed drying and wetting trends since 1950 may have resulted at least partly from historical external forcing. However, the drying over Southeast Asia and wetting over Northwest Australia are absent in the 21st century projections. 
    more » « less
  5. null (Ed.)
    Abstract. Even though desert dust is the most abundant aerosol bymass in Earth's atmosphere, atmospheric models struggle to accuratelyrepresent its spatial and temporal distribution. These model errors arepartially caused by fundamental difficulties in simulating dust emission incoarse-resolution models and in accurately representing dust microphysicalproperties. Here we mitigate these problems by developing a new methodologythat yields an improved representation of the global dust cycle. We presentan analytical framework that uses inverse modeling to integrate an ensembleof global model simulations with observational constraints on the dust sizedistribution, extinction efficiency, and regional dust aerosol opticaldepth. We then compare the inverse model results against independentmeasurements of dust surface concentration and deposition flux and find thaterrors are reduced by approximately a factor of 2 relative to currentmodel simulations of the Northern Hemisphere dust cycle. The inverse modelresults show smaller improvements in the less dusty Southern Hemisphere,most likely because both the model simulations and the observationalconstraints used in the inverse model are less accurate. On a global basis,we find that the emission flux of dust with a geometric diameter up to 20 µm (PM20) is approximately 5000 Tg yr−1, which is greater than mostmodels account for. This larger PM20 dust flux is needed to matchobservational constraints showing a large atmospheric loading of coarsedust. We obtain gridded datasets of dust emission, vertically integratedloading, dust aerosol optical depth, (surface) concentration, and wet anddry deposition fluxes that are resolved by season and particle size. As ourresults indicate that this dataset is more accurate than current modelsimulations and the MERRA-2 dust reanalysis product, it can be used toimprove quantifications of dust impacts on the Earth system. 
    more » « less