Abstract BackgroundIn several eukaryotes, DNA methylation occurs within the coding regions of many genes, termed gene body methylation (GbM). Whereas the role of DNA methylation on the silencing of transposons and repetitive DNA is well understood, gene body methylation is not associated with transcriptional repression, and its biological importance remains unclear. ResultsWe report a newly discovered type of GbM in plants, which is under constitutive addition and removal by dynamic methylation modifiers in all cells, including the germline. Methylation at Dynamic GbM genes is removed by the DRDD demethylation pathway and added by an unknown source of de novo methylation, most likely the maintenance methyltransferase MET1. We show that the Dynamic GbM state is present at homologous genes across divergent lineages spanning over 100 million years, indicating evolutionary conservation. We demonstrate that Dynamic GbM is tightly associated with the presence of a promoter or regulatory chromatin state within the gene body, in contrast to other gene body methylated genes. We find Dynamic GbM is associated with enhanced gene expression plasticity across development and diverse physiological conditions, whereas stably methylated GbM genes exhibit reduced plasticity. Dynamic GbM genes exhibit reduced dynamic range indrddmutants, indicating a causal link between DNA demethylation and enhanced gene expression plasticity. ConclusionsWe propose a new model for GbM in regulating gene expression plasticity, including a novel type of GbM in which increased gene expression plasticity is associated with the activity of DNA methylation writers and erasers and the enrichment of a regulatory chromatin state.
more »
« less
Massively integrated coexpression analysis reveals transcriptional regulation, evolution and cellular implications of the yeast noncanonical translatome
Abstract BackgroundRecent studies uncovered pervasive transcription and translation of thousands of noncanonical open reading frames (nORFs) outside of annotated genes. The contribution of nORFs to cellular phenotypes is difficult to infer using conventional approaches because nORFs tend to be short, of recent de novo origins, and lowly expressed. Here we develop a dedicated coexpression analysis framework that accounts for low expression to investigate the transcriptional regulation, evolution, and potential cellular roles of nORFs inSaccharomyces cerevisiae. ResultsOur results reveal that nORFs tend to be preferentially coexpressed with genes involved in cellular transport or homeostasis but rarely with genes involved in RNA processing. Mechanistically, we discover that young de novo nORFs located downstream of conserved genes tend to leverage their neighbors’ promoters through transcription readthrough, resulting in high coexpression and high expression levels. Transcriptional piggybacking also influences the coexpression profiles of young de novo nORFs located upstream of genes, but to a lesser extent and without detectable impact on expression levels. Transcriptional piggybacking influences, but does not determine, the transcription profiles of de novo nORFs emerging nearby genes. About 40% of nORFs are not strongly coexpressed with any gene but are transcriptionally regulated nonetheless and tend to form entirely new transcription modules. We offer a web browser interface (https://carvunislab.csb.pitt.edu/shiny/coexpression/) to efficiently query, visualize, and download our coexpression inferences. ConclusionsOur results suggest that nORF transcription is highly regulated. Our coexpression dataset serves as an unprecedented resource for unraveling how nORFs integrate into cellular networks, contribute to cellular phenotypes, and evolve.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2144349
- PAR ID:
- 10548922
- Publisher / Repository:
- Springer Nature
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Genome Biology
- Volume:
- 25
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1474-760X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Evolutionary adaptation increases the fitness of a species in its environment. It can occur through rewiring of gene regulatory networks, such that an organism responds appropriately to environmental changes. We investigated whether sirtuin deacetylases, which repress transcription and require NAD+ for activity, serve as transcriptional rewiring points that facilitate the evolution of potentially adaptive traits. If so, bringing genes under the control of sirtuins could enable organisms to mount appropriate responses to stresses that decrease NAD+ levels. To explore how the genomic targets of sirtuins shift over evolutionary time, we compared two yeast species, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis, that display differences in cellular metabolism and life cycle timing in response to nutrient availability. We identified sirtuin-regulated genes through a combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation and RNA expression. In both species, regulated genes were associated with NAD+ homeostasis, mating, and sporulation, but the specific genes differed. In addition, regulated genes in K. lactis were associated with other processes, including utilization of nonglucose carbon sources, detoxification of arsenic, and production of the siderophore pulcherrimin. Consistent with the species-restricted regulation of these genes, sirtuin deletion affected relevant phenotypes in K. lactis but not S. cerevisiae. Finally, sirtuin-regulated gene sets were depleted for broadly conserved genes, consistent with sirtuins regulating processes restricted to a few species. Taken together, these results are consistent with the notion that sirtuins serve as rewiring points that allow species to evolve distinct responses to low NAD+ stress.more » « less
-
Abstract Spatial gene expression in tissue is characterized by regions in which particular genes are enriched or depleted. Frequently, these regions contain nested inside them subregions with distinct expression patterns. Segmentation methods in spatial transcriptomic (ST) data extract disjoint regions maximizing similarity over the greatest number of genes, typically on a particular spatial scale, thus lacking the ability to find region-within-region structure. We present NeST, which extracts spatial structure through coexpression hotspots—regions exhibiting localized spatial coexpression of some set of genes. Coexpression hotspots identify structure on any spatial scale, over any possible subset of genes, and are highly explainable. NeST also performs spatial analysis of cell-cell interactions via ligand-receptor, identifying active areas de novo without restriction of cell type or other groupings, in both two and three dimensions. Through application on ST datasets of varying type and resolution, we demonstrate the ability of NeST to reveal a new level of biological structure.more » « less
-
The glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors (GR and MR, respectively) have distinct, yet overlapping physiological and pathophysiological functions. There are indications that both receptors interact functionally and physically, but the precise role of this interdependence is poorly understood. Here, we analyzed the impact of GR coexpression on MR genome-wide transcriptional responses and chromatin binding upon activation by aldosterone and glucocorticoids, both physiological ligands of this receptor. Transcriptional responses of MR in the absence of GR result in fewer regulated genes. In contrast, coexpression of GR potentiates MR-mediated transcription, particularly in response to aldosterone, both in cell lines and in the more physiologically relevant model of mouse colon organoids. MR chromatin binding is altered by GR coexpression in a locus- and ligand-specific way. Single-molecule tracking of MR suggests that the presence of GR contributes to productive binding of MR/aldosterone complexes to chromatin. Together, our data indicate that coexpression of GR potentiates aldosterone-mediated MR transcriptional activity, even in the absence of glucocorticoids.more » « less
-
Svensson, Sarah L (Ed.)ABSTRACT In starvingBacillus subtilisbacteria,the initiation of two survival programs—biofilm formation and sporulation—is controlled by the same phosphorylated master regulator, Spo0A~P. Its gene,spo0A,is transcribed from two promoters, Pvand Ps,that are, respectively, regulated by RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzymes bearing σAand σH. Notably, transcription is directly autoregulated by Spo0A~P binding sites known as 0A1, 0A2, and 0A3 box, located in between the two promoters. It remains unclear whether, at the onset of starvation, these boxes activate or repressspo0Aexpression, and whether the Spo0A~P transcriptional feedback plays a role in the increase inspo0Aexpression. Based on the experimental data of the promoter activities under systematic perturbation of the promoter architecture, we developed a biophysical model of transcriptional regulation ofspo0Aby Spo0A~P binding to each of the 0A boxes. The model predicts that Spo0A~P binding to its boxes does not affect the RNAP recruitment to the promoters but instead affects the transcriptional initiation rate. Moreover, the effects of Spo0A~P binding to 0A boxes are mainly repressive and saturated early at the onset of starvation. Therefore, the increase inspo0Aexpression is mainly driven by the increase in RNAP holoenzyme levels. Additionally, we reveal that Spo0A~P affinity to 0A boxes is strongest at 0A3 and weakest at 0A2 and that there are attractive forces between the occupied 0A boxes. Our findings, in addition to clarifying how the sporulation master regulator is controlled, offer a framework to predict regulatory outcomes of complex gene-regulatory mechanisms. IMPORTANCECell differentiation is often critical for survival. In bacteria, differentiation decisions are controlled by transcriptional master regulators under transcriptional feedback control. Therefore, understanding how master regulators are transcriptionally regulated is required to understand differentiation. However, in many cases, the underlying regulation is complex, with multiple transcription factor binding sites and multiple promoters, making it challenging to dissect the exact mechanisms. Here, we address this problem for theBacillus subtilismaster regulator Spo0A. Using a biophysical model, we quantitatively characterize the effect of individual transcription factor binding sites on eachspo0Apromoter. Furthermore, the model allows us to identify the specific transcription step that is affected by transcription factor binding. Such a model is promising for the quantitative study of a wide range of master regulators involved in transcriptional feedback.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

