An official website of the United States government
Abstract Camera traps (CT) have been used to study a wide diversity of wildlife around the world. However, despite their widespread use, standardized protocols are lacking, potentially leading to reduced efficiency and inhibiting study comparisons, generalizability, and repeatability. While there are general guidelines and considerations researchers should be aware of when designing a CT survey, studies have shown the vital importance of selecting sampling schemes and camera settings tailored to specific characteristics of the wildlife system of interest. For many species and regions, optimal sampling protocols have not been thoroughly evaluated, especially in vast open landscapes. We used CT data on barren‐ground caribou (Rangifer tarandus) in the open landscape of arctic Alaska as a case study to evaluate and quantify the influence of camera trigger type (i.e., motion detection vs. time‐lapse) and time‐lapse interval on data generation to inform sampling protocols for future CT research in this system or others like it. Comparing camera trigger types, we found 5 min interval time‐lapse generated seven‐times more images containing caribou compared to motion detection. However, the detection rate of motion detection was over 11‐times greater than time‐lapse resulting in more efficient data collection with respect to camera battery life, data storage, and data processing time. Exploring the effect of time‐lapse interval length, we found detections were highly sensitive to interval length with a 30 min interval producing 33.7% fewer images containing caribou and identifying 22.2% fewer trap days containing caribou compared to a 5 min interval. Our results provide insight into effective CT sampling protocols for open landscapes and highlight the importance of critically evaluating and selecting camera settings that account for characteristics of the study system to ensure adequate data is generated efficiently to address study objectives.
more »
« less
Soundscape Ecology to Assess Environmental and Anthropogenic Controls on Wildlife Behavior: Environmental Data (Northeastern Alaska and Northwestern Canada, 2017-2023)
This project used cutting-edge soundscape observations and analyses to quantify the influence of changing environmental dynamics and increasing anthropogenic activity on the behavior and phenology of migratory caribou, waterfowl, and songbird communities in Arctic-boreal Alaska and northwestern Canada. We used acoustic and camera-trap monitoring methods to evaluate wildlife responses in novel and non-invasive ways across broad spatial ranges during crucial seasons. Our study combined field observations, modeling, and analyses included (1) soundscape measurements, (2) camera-trap observations, (3) automated soundscape analyses, (4) analyses of camera-trap caribou observations, (5) high-resolution modeling of environmental variables, and (6) statistical analyses of wildlife occupancy, diversity, and phenology. This “Environmental Data” dataset package describes and includes the high-resolution environmental variables used in this study.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1839195
- PAR ID:
- 10561163
- Publisher / Repository:
- NSF Arctic Data Center
- Date Published:
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Soundscape Acoustic monitoring Camera-trap monitoring Birds Caribou Environmental variables Snow
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Other: text/xml
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
### Access Files can be accessed and downloaded from the directory via: [https://arcticdata.io/data/10.18739/A2CJ87N8D/](https://arcticdata.io/data/10.18739/A2CJ87N8D/). ### Overview This dataset provides camera trap images from 40 sites on the northern coastal plain of Alaska. Cameras collected motion sensor and time-lapse (5 minute intervals) images from May-September 2019, and 2021-2023.This dataset was used to monitor summer distribution and behavior of wildlife, including land mammals and birds. The images also provide information on seasonal change (snow melt), weather, and plant phenology. The dataset helped to design effective camera-trap protocols for monitoring and comparing wildlife presence in developed (oil fields) and undeveloped (Arctic National Wildlife Refuge) areas. These images create baseline data for future research to assess ecosystem change as human activity increases and temperatures warm in northern Alaska.more » « less
-
Monitoring of wildlife at Hubbard Brook is essential to understand how these species are responding to forest and environmental condition over time, while also placing those wildlife species in the context of ecosystem structural and functional attributes. The presence and persistence of wildlife species common to an area can indicate suitable habitat conditions as well as refugia for less common species. Changes in species presence and activity, such as fewer to no sightings, may point to shifting conditions not suitable to the species missing from the area. Camera trap monitoring allows for continuous, non-obtrusive observation of many different species of wildlife and can be used as part of our understanding of current suitability of habitat condition. To better understand integrated forest condition, we established a camera trap network located at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest in the White Mountains of central New Hampshire. The cameras have logged over 1,500 wildlife observations, confirming the presence of many species, including those not previously reported (pine marten and river otter). A total of 15 mammal species have been detected and have also been effective at detecting some bird species, including the Northern Harrier. Natural history observations have provided insight into the lives of the species detected, including reproduction (Bull moose following cow during rut, moose calves, deer fawns), predation (red fox with snow-shoe hare) and presence of parasites (winter ticks on moose with hairless shoulders). These data were gathered as part of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study (HBES). The HBES is a collaborative effort at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, which is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.more » « less
-
Abstract Camera trapping has revolutionized wildlife ecology and conservation by providing automated data acquisition, leading to the accumulation of massive amounts of camera trap data worldwide. Although management and processing of camera trap‐derived Big Data are becoming increasingly solvable with the help of scalable cyber‐infrastructures, harmonization and exchange of the data remain limited, hindering its full potential. There is currently no widely accepted standard for exchanging camera trap data. The only existing proposal, “Camera Trap Metadata Standard” (CTMS), has several technical shortcomings and limited adoption. We present a new data exchange format, the Camera Trap Data Package (Camtrap DP), designed to allow users to easily exchange, harmonize and archive camera trap data at local to global scales. Camtrap DP structures camera trap data in a simple yet flexible data model consisting of three tables (Deployments, Media and Observations) that supports a wide range of camera deployment designs, classification techniques (e.g., human and AI, media‐based and event‐based) and analytical use cases, from compiling species occurrence data through distribution, occupancy and activity modeling to density estimation. The format further achieves interoperability by building upon existing standards, Frictionless Data Package in particular, which is supported by a suite of open software tools to read and validate data. Camtrap DP is the consensus of a long, in‐depth, consultation and outreach process with standard and software developers, the main existing camera trap data management platforms, major players in the field of camera trapping and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). Under the umbrella of the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG), Camtrap DP has been developed openly, collaboratively and with version control from the start. We encourage camera trapping users and developers to join the discussion and contribute to the further development and adoption of this standard.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT We created the SiMPL wildlife magnet—a baited camera trap design that allows passive monitoring of wildlife, particularly small‐ to medium‐sized mammals. The SiMPL wildlife magnet is inexpensive and easy to construct. To evaluate its effectiveness, we conducted a two‐year case study using 9 camera stations along an elevation gradient in the White Mountains of the northeastern United States. We examined how the detection probability of mammal species changed with the inclusion of a SiMPL wildlife magnet using data from pre‐and post‐establishment. We found a significant increase in community‐level detection probability with the use of SiMPL wildlife magnets and for individual species, including red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus), American marten (Martes americana), and fisher (Pekania pennanti). Moreover, we were able to capture more species with SiMPL wildlife magnets than without, including flying squirrels (Glaucomysspp.), various rodents (Cricetidaespp.), black bears (Ursus americanus), moose (Alces alces), owls, and other birds. The SiMPL wildlife magnet is an effective, low‐cost method for surveying wildlife communities, especially rodents and mesocarnivores. It addresses the limited field of view presented by other techniques for capturing small mammals on camera traps and enables efficient collection of phenology data, including vegetation and snowpack. This tool has several applications, including monitoring species' responses to management practices and global change.more » « less
