An official website of the United States government
The D1 subunit of photosystem II (PSII) is subject to light-induced damage. In plants, D1 photodamage activates translation of chloroplastpsbAmRNA encoding D1, providing D1 for PSII repair. Three D1 assembly factors have been implicated in the regulatory mechanism: HCF244 and RBD1 activatepsbAtranslation, whereas HCF136 repressespsbAtranslation in the dark. To clarify the regulatory circuit, we analyzedpsbAribosome occupancy in dark-adapted and illuminatedrbd1andrbd1;hcf136double mutants in Arabidopsis and in Zm-hcf244and Zm-hcf244;Zm-hcf136double mutants in maize. The results show that RBD1 is required for light-inducedpsbAtranslation but has only a small effect onpsbAribosome occupancy in the dark. RBD1 is not required forpsbAtranslation when HCF136 is absent, indicating that RBD1 activatespsbAtranslation in the light by inhibiting HCF136’s repressive effect. By contrast, HCF244 is required to recruit ribosomes topsbAmRNA in light, dark, and in the absence of HCF136. We demonstrate further that HCF244 is not required for the translational activator HCF173 to bind thepsbA5’UTR. These results show that RBD1 is central to the perception of the D1 photodamage that triggers D1 synthesis and that it activatespsbAtranslation by relieving repression by an HCF136-dependent assembly intermediate. HCF244 activates downstream of those events without impacting HCF173’s binding topsbAmRNA. The results implicate a feature of nascent D1 that is affected by both HCF136 and RBD1 as the signal that reports D1 photodamage to regulatepsbAtranslation rate as needed for PSII repair.
more »
« less
Translational activation by a synthetic PPR protein elucidates control of psbA translation in Arabidopsis chloroplasts
Abstract Translation initiation on chloroplast psbA mRNA in plants scales with light intensity, providing its gene product, D1, as needed to replace photodamaged D1 in Photosystem II. The psbA translational activator HIGH CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE 173 (HCF173) has been hypothesized to mediate this regulation. HCF173 belongs to the short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase superfamily, associates with the psbA 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR), and has been hypothesized to enhance translation by binding an RNA segment that would otherwise pair with and mask the ribosome binding region. To test these hypotheses, we examined whether a synthetic pentatricopeptide repeat (sPPR) protein can substitute for HCF173 when bound to the HCF173 binding site. We show that an sPPR designed to bind HCF173's footprint in the psbA 5′-UTR bound the intended site in vivo and partially substituted for HCF173 to activate psbA translation. However, sPPR-activated translation did not respond to light. These results imply that HCF173 activates translation, at least in part, by sequestering the RNA it binds to maintain an accessible ribosome binding region, and that HCF173 is also required to regulate psbA translation in response to light. Translational activation can be added to the functions that can be programmed with sPPR proteins for synthetic biology applications in chloroplasts.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10566490
- Publisher / Repository:
- ASPB
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Plant Cell
- Volume:
- 36
- Issue:
- 10
- ISSN:
- 1040-4651
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 4168 to 4178
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract The D1 subunit of photosystem II is subject to photooxidative damage. Photodamaged D1 must be replaced with nascent D1 to maintain photosynthesis. In plant chloroplasts, D1 photodamage regulates D1 synthesis by modulating translation initiation on psbA mRNA encoding D1, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. Analyses of reporter constructs in transplastomic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) showed that the psbA translational regulator HCF173 activates via a cis-element in the psbA 5′-UTR. However, the psbA UTRs are not sufficient to program light-regulated translation. Instead, the psbA open reading frame represses translation initiation in cis, and D1 photodamage relieves this repression. HCF173 remains bound to the psbA 5′-UTR in the dark and truncation of HCF173 prevents repression in the dark, implicating HCF173 as a mediator of repression. We propose a model that accounts for these and prior observations, which is informed by structures of the Complex I assembly factor CIA30/NDUFAF1. We posit that D1 photodamage relieves a repressive cotranslational interaction between nascent D1 and HCF173's CIA30 domain, that the photosystem II assembly factor HCF136 promotes this repressive interaction, and that these events toggle HCF173 between activating and repressive conformations on psbA mRNA. These findings elucidate a translational rheostat that optimizes photosynthesis in response to shifting light conditions.more » « less
-
SUMMARY Translation of the chloroplastpsbAmRNA in angiosperms is activated by photodamage of its gene product, the D1 subunit of photosystem II (PSII), providing nascent D1 for PSII repair. The involvement of chlorophyll in the regulatory mechanism has been suggested due to the regulatory roles of proteins proposed to mediate chlorophyll/D1 transactions and the fact that chlorophyll is synthesized only in the light in angiosperms. We used ribosome profiling and RNA‐seq to address whether the effects of light on chloroplast translation are conserved in the liverwort Marchantia (Marchantia polymorpha), which synthesizes chlorophyll in both the dark and the light. As in angiosperms, ribosome occupancy onpsbAmRNA decreased rapidly upon shifting plants to the dark and was rapidly restored upon a transfer back to the light, whereas ribosome occupancy on other chloroplast mRNAs changed very little. The results were similar in aMarchantiamutant unable to synthesize chlorophyll in the dark. Those results, in conjunction with pulse‐labeling data, suggest that light elicits a plastome‐wide activation of translation elongation and a specific increase inpsbAtranslation initiation inMarchantia, as in angiosperms. These findings show that light regulates chloroplast translation similarly in vascular and non‐vascular plants, and that constitutive chlorophyll synthesis does not affect light‐regulatedpsbAtranslation initiation. Additionally, the translational outputs of chloroplast genes are similar inMarchantiaand angiosperms but result from differing contributions of mRNA abundance and translational efficiencies. This adds to the evidence that chloroplast mRNA abundance and translational efficiencies co‐evolve under selection to maintain protein outputs.more » « less
-
Structures in the 5′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of mRNAs can physically modulate translation efficiency by impeding the scanning ribosome or by sequestering the translational start site. We assessed the impact of stable protein binding in 5′- and 3′-UTRs on translation efficiency by targeting the MS2 coat protein to a reporter RNA via its hairpin recognition site. Translation was assessed from the reporter RNA when coexpressed with MS2 coat proteins of varying affinities for the RNA, and at different expression levels. Binding of high-affinity proteins in the 5′-UTR hindered translation, whereas no effect was observed when the coat protein was targeted to the 3′-UTR. Inhibition of translation increased with coat protein concentration and affinity, reaching a maximum of 50%–70%. MS2 proteins engineered to bind two reporter mRNA sites had a stronger effect than those binding a single site. Our findings demonstrate that protein binding in an mRNA 5′-UTR physically impedes translation, with the effect governed by affinity, concentration, and sterics.more » « less
-
Protein translation is globally downregulated under stress conditions. Many proteins that are synthesized under stress conditions use a cap-independent translation initiation pathway. A subset of cellular mRNAs that encode for these proteins contain stable secondary structures within their 5′UTR, and initiate cap-independent translation using elements called cap-independent translation enhancers or internal ribosome entry sites within their 5′UTRs. The interaction among initiation factors such as eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), eIF4A, and eIF4GI, especially in regulating the eIF4F complex during noncanonical translation initiation of different 5′UTR mRNAs, is poorly understood. Here, equilibrium-binding assays, CD studies and in vitro translation assays were used to elucidate the recruitment of these initiation factors to the highly structured 5′UTRs of fibroblast-growth factor 9 (FGF-9) and hypoxia inducible factor 1 subunit alpha (HIF-1α) encoding mRNAs. We showed that eIF4A and eIF4E enhanced eIF4GI’s binding affinity to the uncapped 5′UTR of HIF-1α mRNA, inducing conformational changes in the protein/RNA complex. In contrast, these factors have no effect on the binding of eIF4GI to the 5′UTR of FGF-9 mRNA. Recently, Izidoro et al. reported that the interaction of 42nt unstructured RNA to human eIF4F complex is dominated by eIF4E and ATP-bound state of eIF4A. Here, we show that structured 5′UTR mRNA binding mitigates this requirement. Based on these observations, we describe two possible cap-independent translation mechanisms for FGF-9 and HIF-1α encoding mRNAs used by cells to mitigate cellular stress conditions.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koae112
