An official website of the United States government
Abstract Theories of dynamic decision-making are typically built on evidence accumulation, which is modeled using racing accumulators or diffusion models that track a shifting balance of support over time. However, these two types of models are only two special cases of a more general evidence accumulation process where options correspond to directions in an accumulation space. Using this generalized evidence accumulation approach as a starting point, I identify four ways to discriminate between absolute-evidence and relative-evidence models. First, an experimenter can look at the information that decision-makers considered to identify whether there is a filtering of near-zero evidence samples, which is characteristic of a relative-evidence decision rule (e.g., diffusion decision model). Second, an experimenter can disentangle different components of drift rates by manipulating the discriminability of the two response options relative to the stimulus to delineate the balance of evidence from the total amount of evidence. Third, a modeler can use machine learning to classify a set of data according to its generative model. Finally, machine learning can also be used to directly estimate the geometric relationships between choice options. I illustrate these different approaches by applying them to data from an orientation-discrimination task, showing converging conclusions across all four methods in favor of accumulator-based representations of evidence during choice. These tools can clearly delineate absolute-evidence and relative-evidence models, and should be useful for comparing many other types of decision theories.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on November 1, 2025
Common neural choice signals can emerge artefactually amid multiple distinct value signals
Abstract Previous work has identified characteristic neural signatures of value-based decision-making, including neural dynamics that closely resemble the ramping evidence accumulation process believed to underpin choice. Here we test whether these signatures of the choice process can be temporally dissociated from additional, choice-‘independent’ value signals. Indeed, EEG activity during value-based choice revealed distinct spatiotemporal clusters, with a stimulus-locked cluster reflecting affective reactions to choice sets and a response-locked cluster reflecting choice difficulty. Surprisingly, ‘neither’ of these clusters met the criteria for an evidence accumulation signal. Instead, we found that stimulus-locked activity can ‘mimic’ an evidence accumulation process when aligned to the response. Re-analysing four previous studies, including three perceptual decision-making studies, we show that response-locked signatures of evidence accumulation disappear when stimulus-locked and response-locked activity are modelled jointly. Collectively, our findings show that neural signatures of value can reflect choice-independent processes and look deceptively like evidence accumulation.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2309022
- PAR ID:
- 10566716
- Publisher / Repository:
- Nature Publishing Group
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Nature Human Behaviour
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 2397-3374
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 2194 to 2208
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The intrinsic uncertainty of sensory information (i.e., evidence) does not necessarily deter an observer from making a reliable decision. Indeed, uncertainty can be reduced by integrating (accumulating) incoming sensory evidence. It is widely thought that this accumulation is instantiated via recurrent rate-code neural networks. Yet, these networks do not fully explain important aspects of perceptual decision-making, such as a subject’s ability to retain accumulated evidence during temporal gaps in the sensory evidence. Here, we utilized computational models to show that cortical circuits can switch flexibly between “retention” and “integration” modes during perceptual decision-making. Further, we found that, depending on how the sensory evidence was readout, we could simulate “stepping” and “ramping” activity patterns, which may be analogous to those seen in different studies of decision-making in the primate parietal cortex. This finding may reconcile these previous empirical studies because it suggests these two activity patterns emerge from the same mechanism.more » « less
-
Value-based decision–making involves multiple cortical and subcortical brain areas, but the distributed nature of neurophysiological activity underlying economic choices in the human brain remains largely unexplored. Specifically, the nature of the neurophysiological representation of reward-guided choices, as well as whether they are represented in a subset of reward-related regions or in a more distributed fashion, is unknown. Here, we hypothesize that reward choices, as well as choice-related computations (win probability, risk), are primarily represented in high-frequency neural activity reflecting local cortical processing and that they are highly distributed throughout the human brain, engaging multiple brain regions. To test these hypotheses, we used intracranial recordings from multiple areas (including orbitofrontal, lateral prefrontal, parietal, cingulate cortices as well as subcortical regions such as the hippocampus and amygdala) from neurosurgical patients of both sexes playing a decision-making game. We show that high-frequency activity (HFA; ɣ and HFA) represents both individual choice-related computations (e.g., risk, win probability) and choice information with different prevalence and regional representation. Choice-related computations are locally and unevenly present in multiple brain regions, whereas choice information is widely distributed and more prevalent and appears later across all regions examined. These results suggest brain-wide reward processing, with local HFA reflecting the coalescence of choice-related information into a final choice, and shed light on the distributed nature of neural activity underlying economic choices in the human brain.more » « less
-
Human decision-making involves the coordinated activity of multiple brain areas, acting in concert, to enable humans to make choices. Most decisions are carried out under conditions of uncertainty, where the desired outcome may not be achieved if the wrong decision is made. In these cases, humans deliberate before making a choice. The neural dynamics underlying deliberation are unknown and intracranial recordings in clinical settings present a unique opportunity to record high temporal resolution electrophysiological data from many (hundreds) brain locations during behavior. Combined with dynamic systems modeling, these allow identification of latent brain states that describe the neural dynamics during decision-making, providing insight into these neural dynamics and computations. Results show that the neural dynamics underlying risky decisions, but not decisions without risk, converge to separate subspaces depending on the subject’s preferred choice and that the degree of overlap between these subspaces declines as choice approaches, suggesting a network level representation of evidence accumulation. These results bridge the gap between regression analyses and data driven models of latent states and suggest that during risky decisions, deliberation and evidence accumulation toward a final decision are represented by the same neural dynamics, providing novel insights into the neural computations underlying human choice.more » « less
-
Abstract In dynamic environments, animals must closely monitor the effects of their actions to inform switches in behavioral strategy. Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) neurons track decision outcomes in these environments. Yet, it remains unclear whether ACC neurons similarly monitor behavioral history in static environments and, if so, whether these signals are distinct from movement representations. We recorded large-scale ACC activity in freely moving mice making visual evidence-accumulation decisions. Many ACC neurons exhibited nonlinear mixed selectivity for previous choices and outcomes (trial history) and were modulated by movements. Trial history could be stably decoded from population activity and accounted for a separable component of neural activity than posture and movements. Trial history encoding was conserved across different subjects and was unaffected by fluctuating behavioral biases. These findings demonstrate that trial history monitoring in ACC is implemented in a conserved population code that is independent of the volatility of subjects’ task environment.more » « less
