An official website of the United States government
Abstract Spatiotemporal variability in ozone dry deposition is often overlooked despite its implications for interpreting and modeling tropospheric ozone concentrations accurately. Understanding the influences of stomatal versus nonstomatal deposition processes on ozone deposition velocity is important for attributing observed changes in the ozone depositional sink and associated damage to ecosystems. Here, we aim to identify the stomatal versus nonstomatal deposition processes driving observed variability in ozone deposition velocity over the northeastern United States during June–September. We use ozone eddy covariance measurements from Harvard Forest in Massachusetts, which span a decade, and from Kane Experimental Forest in Pennsylvania and Sand Flats State Forest in New York, which span one growing season each, along with observation‐driven modeling. Using a cumulative precipitation indicator of soil wetness, we infer that high soil uptake during dry years and low soil uptake during wet years may contribute to the twofold interannual variability in ozone deposition velocity at Harvard Forest. We link stomatal deposition and humidity to variability in ozone deposition velocity on daily timescales. The humidity dependence may reflect higher uptake by leaf cuticles under humid conditions, noted in previous work. Previous work also suggests that uptake by leaf cuticles may be enhanced after rain, but we find that increases in ozone deposition velocity on rainy days are instead mostly associated with increases in stomatal conductance. Our analysis highlights a need for constraints on subseasonal variability in ozone dry deposition to soil and fast in‐canopy chemistry during ecosystem stress.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on December 9, 2025
B13A-1536: A decade of precipitation extremes shape long-term forest-atmosphere carbon and water flux within a temperate mesic forest
The northeastern U.S. has experienced a rapid rise in extreme precipitation events and total precipitation due to climate change. Despite higher overall precipitation, long-term near-surface soil moisture at the Harvard Forest in Petersham, MA has decreased since 2010, a pattern also observed in other global temperate forest regions. In this study, we used more than thirty years of ecosystem-atmosphere water and carbon exchange at the Harvard Forest to understand the impact of precipitation extremes during the past decade on ecosystem water and carbon fluxes and the strength of land-atmosphere coupling. We found that in this mesic temperate forest, well-drained post-glacial soils rapidly drain surplus moisture from large rain events, while the remaining moisture necessary to preserve local humidity is quickly lost to evapotranspiration unless frequently replenished by rainfall. This region has also experienced two hot summer droughts during the past decade, causing further hydrological stress with carbon cycle implications. Furthermore, meteorological conditions in the nongrowing season have particularly shifted to warmer, drier conditions that set the stage for more frequent summer soil moisture deficits. In response to this past decade of hydrological extremes, we have observed a dampening of canopy light response curves, indicating lower rates of carbon uptake during the growing season and a parallel decline in ecosystem respiration as soils dry. More frequent dry conditions during key phenological windows, the intense delivery of rainfall during a shorter temporal window in the growing season, and rising summer temperatures and lower humidity have combined to decrease the ecosystem carbon uptake by photosynthesis and created large interannual variation in the strength of the net carbon sink at Harvard Forest during the past decade compared to the prior two decades of this study.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2231681
- PAR ID:
- 10567804
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Geophysical Union
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Washington, DC
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Alterations in global climate via extreme precipitation will have broadscale implications on ecosystem functioning. The increased frequency of drought, coupled with heavy, episodic rainfall are likely to generate impacts on biotic and abiotic processes across aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Despite the demonstrated shifts in global precipitation, less is known how extreme precipitation interacts with biophysical factors to control future demographic processes, especially those sensitive to climate extremes such as organismal recruitment and survival. We utilized a field‐based precipitation manipulation experiment in 0.1 ha forest canopy openings to test future climate scenarios characterized by extreme precipitation on temperate tree seedling survival. The effects of planting seedbeds (undisturbed leaf litter/organic material vs. scarified, exposed mineral soils), seedling ontogeny, species, and functional traits were examined against four statistically defined precipitation scenarios. Results indicated that seedlings grown within precipitation treatments characterized by heavy, episodic rainfall preceded by prolonged drying responded similarly to drought treatments lacking episodic inputs. Moreover, among all treatment conditions tested, scarified seedbeds most strongly affected seedling survivorship (odds ratio 6.9). Compared with any precipitation treatment, the effect size (predicted probabilities) of the seedbed was more than twice as important in controlling seedling survivorship. However, the interaction between precipitation and seedbed resulted in a 27.9% improvement in survivorship for moisture‐sensitive species. Seedling sensitivity to moisture was variable among species, and most closely linked with functional traits such as seed mass. For instance, under dry moisture regimes, survivorship increased linearly with seed mass (log transformed; adjustedR2 = 0.72,p < 0.001), yet no relationship was apparent under wet moisture regimes. Although precipitation influenced survival, extreme rainfall events were not enough to offset moisture deficits nor provide a rescue effect under drought conditions. The relationships reported here highlight the importance of plant seedbeds and species (e.g., functional traits) as edaphic and biotic controls that modify the influence of extreme future precipitation on seedling survival in temperate forests. Finally, we demonstrated the biophysical factors that were most influential to early forest development and that may override the negative effects of increasingly variable precipitation. This work contributes to refinements of species distribution models and can inform reforestation strategies intended to maintain biodiversity and ecosystem function under increasing climate extremes.more » « less
-
Abstract Southwest North America is projected by models to aridify, defined as declining summer soil moisture, under the influence of rising greenhouse gases. Here, we investigate the driving mechanisms of aridification that connect the oceans, atmosphere, and land surface across seasons. The analysis is based on atmosphere model simulations forced by imposed sea surface temperatures (SSTs). For the historical period, these are the observed ones, and the model is run to 2041 using SSTs that account for realistic and plausible evolutions of Pacific Ocean and Atlantic Ocean interannual to decadal variability imposed on estimates of radiatively forced SST change. The results emphasize the importance of changes in precipitation throughout the year for declines in summer soil moisture. In the worst-case scenario, a cool tropical Pacific and warm North Atlantic lead to reduced cool season precipitation and soil moisture. Drier soils then persist into summer such that evapotranspiration reduces and soil moisture partially recovers. In the best-case scenario, the opposite states of the oceans lead to increased cool season precipitation but higher evapotranspiration prevents this from increasing summer soil moisture. Across the scenarios, atmospheric humidity is primarily controlled by soil moisture: drier soils lead to reduced evapotranspiration, lower air humidity, and higher vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Radiatively forced change reduces fall precipitation via anomalous transient eddy moisture flux divergence. Fall drying causes soils to enter winter dry such that, even in the best-case scenario of cool season precipitation increase, soil moisture remains dry. Radiative forcing reduces summer precipitation aided by reduced evapotranspiration from drier soils. Significance StatementSouthwest North America has long been projected to undergo aridification under rising greenhouse gases. In this model-based paper, we examine how coupling across seasons between the atmosphere and land system moves the region toward reduced summer soil moisture. The results show the dominant control on summer soil moisture by precipitation throughout the year. It also shows that even in best-case scenarios when changes in decadal modes of ocean variability lead to increases in cool season precipitation, rising spring and summer evapotranspiration means this does not translate into increased summer soil moisture. The work places projections of regional aridification on a firmer basis of understanding of the ocean driving of the atmosphere and its coupling to the land system.more » « less
-
Abstract On seasonal time scales, vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is a known predictor of burned area in the southwestern United States (“the Southwest”). VPD increases with atmospheric warming due to the exponential relationship between temperature and saturation vapor pressure. Another control on VPD is specific humidity, such that increases in specific humidity can counteract temperature-driven increases in VPD. Unexpectedly, despite the increased capacity of a warmer atmosphere to hold water vapor, near-surface specific humidity decreased from 1970 to 2019 in much of the Southwest, particularly in spring, summer, and fall. Here, we identify declining near-surface humidity from 1970 to 2019 in the southwestern United States with both reanalysis and in situ station data. Focusing on the interior Southwest in the months preceding the summer forest fire season, we explain the decline in terms of changes in atmospheric circulation and moisture fluxes between the surface and the atmosphere. We find that an early spring decline in precipitation in the interior region induced a decline in soil moisture and evapotranspiration, drying the lower troposphere in summer. This prior season precipitation decline is in turn related to a trend toward a Northern Hemisphere stationary wave pattern. Finally, using fixed humidity scenarios and the observed exponential relationship between VPD and burned forest area, we estimate that with no increase in temperature at all, the humidity decline alone would still lead to nearly one-quarter of the observed VPD-induced increase in burned area over 1984–2019. Significance StatementBurned forest area has increased significantly in the southwestern United States in recent decades, driven in part by an increase in atmospheric aridity [vapor pressure deficit (VPD)]. Increases in VPD can be caused by a combination of increasing temperature and decreasing specific humidity. As the atmosphere warms with climate change, its capacity to hold moisture increases. Despite this, there is a decrease in near-surface air humidity in the interior southwestern United States over 1970–2019, which during the summer is likely caused by a decline in early spring precipitation leading to limited soil moisture and evaporation in spring and summer. We estimate that this declining humidity alone, without an increase in temperature, would cause about one-quarter of the VPD-induced increase in burned forest area in this region over 1984–2019.more » « less
-
Abstract Carbon fluxes at the land‐atmosphere interface are strongly influenced by weather and climate conditions. Yet what is usually known as “climate extremes” does not always translate into very high or low carbon fluxes or so‐called “carbon extremes.” To reveal the patterns of how climate extremes influence terrestrial carbon fluxes, we analyzed the interannual variations in ecosystem carbon fluxes simulated by the Terrestrial Biosphere Models (TBMs) in the Inter‐Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. At the global level, TBMs simulated reduced ecosystem net primary productivity (NPP; 18.5 ± 9.3 g C m−2 yr−1), but enhanced heterotrophic respiration (Rh; 7 ± 4.6 g C m−2 yr−1) during extremely hot events. TBMs also simulated reduced NPP (60.9 ± 24.4 g C m−2 yr−1) and reduced Rh (16.5 ± 11.4 g C m−2 yr−1) during extreme dry events. Influences of precipitation extremes on terrestrial carbon uptake were larger in the arid/semiarid zones than other regions. During hot extremes, ecosystems in the low latitudes experienced a larger reduction in carbon uptake. However, a large fraction of carbon extremes did not occur in concert with either temperature or precipitation extremes. Rather these carbon extremes are likely to be caused by the interactive effects of the concurrent temperature and precipitation anomalies. The interactive effects showed considerable spatial variations with the largest effects on NPP in South America and Africa. Additionally, TBMs simulated a stronger sensitivity of ecosystem productivity to precipitation than satellite estimates. This study provides new insights into the complex ecosystem responses to climate extremes, especially the emergent properties of carbon dynamics resulting from compound climate extremes.more » « less
