Abstract. The tropical tropopause layer (TTL) is a sea of vertical motions. Convectively generated gravity waves create vertical winds on scales of a few to thousands of kilometers as they propagate in a stable atmosphere. Turbulence from gravity wave breaking, radiatively driven convection, and Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities stirs up the TTL on the kilometer scale. TTL cirrus clouds, which moderate the water vapor concentration in the TTL and stratosphere, form in the cold phases of large-scale (> 100 km) wave activity. It has been proposed in several modeling studies that small-scale (< 100 km) vertical motions control the ice crystal number concentration and the dehydration efficiency of TTL cirrus clouds. Here, we present the first observational evidence for this. High-rate vertical winds measured by aircraft are a valuable and underutilized tool for constraining small-scale TTL vertical wind variability, examining its impacts on TTL cirrus clouds, and evaluating atmospheric models. We use 20 Hz data from five National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) campaigns to quantify small-scale vertical wind variability in the TTL and to see how it varies with ice water content, distance from deep convective cores, and height in the TTL. We find that 1 Hz vertical winds are well represented by a normal distribution, with a standard deviation of 0.2–0.4 m s−1. Consistent with a previous observational study that analyzed two out of the five aircraft campaigns that we analyze here, we find that turbulence is enhanced over the tropical west Pacific and within 100 km of convection and is most common in the lower TTL (14–15.5 km), closer to deep convection, and in the upper TTL (15.5–17 km), further from deep convection. An algorithm to classify turbulence and long-wavelength (5 km < λ < 100 km) and short-wavelength (λ < 5 km) gravity wave activity during level flight legs is applied to data from the Airborne Tropical TRopopause EXperiment (ATTREX). The most commonly sampled conditions are (1) a quiescent atmosphere with negligible small-scale vertical wind variability, (2) long-wavelength gravity wave activity (LW GWA), and (3) LW GWA with turbulence. Turbulence rarely occurs in the absence of gravity wave activity. Cirrus clouds with ice crystal number concentrations exceeding 20 L−1 and ice water content exceeding 1 mg m−3 are rare in a quiescent atmosphere but about 20 times more likely when there is gravity wave activity and 50 times more likely when there is also turbulence, confirming the results of the aforementioned modeling studies. Our observational analysis shows that small-scale gravity waves strongly influence the ice crystal number concentration and ice water content within TTL cirrus clouds. Global storm-resolving models have recently been run with horizontal grid spacing between 1 and 10 km, which is sufficient to resolve some small-scale gravity wave activity. We evaluate simulated vertical wind spectra (10–100 km) from four global storm-resolving simulations that have horizontal grid spacing of 3–5 km with aircraft observations from ATTREX. We find that all four models have too little resolved vertical wind at horizontal wavelengths between 10 and 100 km and thus too little small-scale gravity wave activity, although the bias is much less pronounced in global SAM than in the other models. We expect that deficient small-scale gravity wave activity significantly limits the realism of simulated ice microphysics in these models and that improved representation requires moving to finer horizontal and vertical grid spacing.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on December 1, 2025
Global Distributions of Atmospheric Turbulence Estimated Using Operational High Vertical-Resolution Radiosonde Data
Abstract Atmospheric turbulence plays a key role in the mixing of trace gases and diffusion of heat and momentum, as well as in aircraft operations. Although numerous observational turbulence studies have been conducted using campaign experiments and operational data, understanding the turbulence characteristics particularly in the free atmosphere remains challenging due to its small-scale, intermittent, and sporadic nature, along with limited observational data. To address this, turbulence in the free atmosphere is estimated herein based on the Thorpe method by using operational high vertical-resolution radiosonde data (HVRRD) with vertical resolutions of about 5 or 10 m across near-global regions, provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) via the U.S. National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) for 6 years (October 2017–September 2023). Globally, turbulence is stronger in the troposphere than in the stratosphere, with maximum turbulence occurring about 6 km below the tropopause, followed by a sharp decrease above. Seasonal variations show strong tropospheric turbulence in summer and weak turbulence in winter for both hemispheres, while the stratosphere exhibits strong turbulence during spring. Regional analyses identify strong turbulence regions over the South Pacific and South Africa in the troposphere and over East Asia and South Africa in the stratosphere. Notably, turbulence information can be provided in regions and high altitudes that are not covered by commercial aircraft, suggesting its potential utility for both present and future high-altitude aircraft operations.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2129223
- PAR ID:
- 10568656
- Publisher / Repository:
- AMS
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
- Volume:
- 105
- Issue:
- 12
- ISSN:
- 0003-0007
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- E2551 to E2566
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The NOAA G-IV aircraft routinely measures vertical aircraft acceleration from the inertial navigation system at 1 Hz. The data provide a measure of turbulence on a 250-m horizontal scale over a layer from 12.8- to 14.8-km elevation. Turbulence in this layer of tropical cyclones was largest by 35%–40% in the inner 200 km of radius and decreased monotonically outward to the 1000-km radius. Turbulence in major hurricanes exceeded that in weaker tropical cyclones. Turbulence data points were divided among three regions of the tropical cyclone: cirrus canopy; outside the cirrus canopy; and a transition zone between them. Without exception, turbulence was greater within the canopy and weaker outside the canopy. Nighttime turbulence exceeded daytime turbulence for all radii, especially within the cirrus canopy, implicating radiative forcing as a factor in turbulence generation. A case study of widespread turbulence in Hurricane Ivan (2004) showed that interactions between the hurricane outflow channel and westerlies to the north created a region of absolute vorticity of −6 × 10−5s−1in the upper troposphere. Outflow accelerated from the storm center into this inertially unstable region, and visible evidence for turbulence and transverse bands of cirrus appeared radially inward of the inertially unstable region. It is argued that both cloud-radiative forcing and the development of inertial instability within a narrow outflow layer were responsible for the turbulence. In contrast, a second case study (Isabel 2003) displayed strong near-core turbulence in the presence of large positive absolute vorticity and no local inertial instability. Peak turbulence occurred 100 km downwind of the eyewall convection.more » « less
-
Abstract The steady response of the stratosphere to tropospheric thermal forcing via an SST perturbation is considered in two separate theoretical models. It is first shown that an SST anomaly imposes a geopotential anomaly at the tropopause. Solutions to the linearized quasigeostrophic potential vorticity equations are then used to show that the vertical length scale of a tropopause geopotential anomaly is initially shallow, but significantly increased by diabatic heating from radiative relaxation. This process is a quasi-balanced response of the stratosphere to tropospheric forcing. A previously developed, coupled troposphere–stratosphere model is then introduced and modified. Solutions under steady, zonally symmetric SST forcing in the linearβ-plane model show that the upward stratospheric penetration of the corresponding tropopause geopotential anomaly is controlled by two nondimensional parameters: 1) a dynamical aspect ratio and 2) a ratio between tropospheric and stratospheric drag. The meridional scale of the SST anomaly, radiative relaxation rate, and wave drag all significantly modulate these nondimensional parameters. Under Earthlike estimates of the nondimensional parameters, the theoretical model predicts stratospheric temperature anomalies 2–3 larger in magnitude than that in the boundary layer, approximately in line with observational data. Using reanalysis data, the spatial variability of temperature anomalies in the troposphere is shown to have remarkable coherence with that of the lower stratosphere, which further supports the existence of a quasi-balanced response of the stratosphere to SST forcing. These findings suggest that besides mechanical and radiative forcing, there is a third way the stratosphere can be forced—through the tropopause via tropospheric thermal forcing. Significance StatementUpward motion in the tropical stratosphere, the layer of atmosphere above where most weather occurs, is thought to be controlled by weather disturbances that propagate upward and dissipate in the stratosphere. The strength of this upward motion is important since it sets the global distribution of ozone. We formulate and use simple mathematical models to show the vertical motion in the stratosphere can also depend on the warming in the troposphere, the layer of atmosphere where humans live. We use the theory as an explanation for our observations of inverse correlations between the ocean temperature and the stratosphere temperature. These findings suggest that local stratospheric cooling may be coupled to local tropospheric warming.more » « less
-
Abstract Simulations of the weather over the South Island of New Zealand on 28 July 2014 reveal unusual wave activity in the stratosphere. A series of short-wavelength perturbations resembling trapped lee waves were located downstream of the topography, but these waves were in the stratosphere, and their crests were oriented north–south, in contrast to both the northeast–southwest orientation of the spine of the Southern Alps and the crests of trapped waves present in the lower troposphere. Vertical cross sections through these waves show a nodal structure consistent with that of a higher-order trapped-wave mode. Eigenmode solutions to the vertical structure equation for two-dimensional, linear, Boussinesq waves were obtained for a horizontally homogeneous sounding representative of the 28 July case. These solutions include higher-order modes having large amplitude in the stratosphere that are supported by just the zonal wind component. Two of these higher-order modes correspond to trapped waves that develop in an idealized numerical simulation of the 28 July 2014 case. These higher-order modes are trapped by very strong westerly winds in the midstratosphere and are triggered by north–south-oriented features in the subrange-scale topography. In contrast, the stratospheric cross-mountain wind component is too weak to trap similar high-order modes with crest-parallel orientation.more » « less
-
Global seasonal distribution of CH 2 Br 2 and CHBr 3 in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphereAbstract. Bromine released from the decomposition of short-lived brominated source gases contributes as a sink of ozone in the lower stratosphere.The two major contributors are CH2Br2 and CHBr3.In this study, we investigate the global seasonal distribution of these two substances, based on four High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO) missions, the HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO) mission, and the Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) mission.Observations of CH2Br2 in the free and upper troposphere indicate a pronounced seasonality in both hemispheres, with slightly larger mixing ratios in the Northern Hemisphere (NH).Compared to CH2Br2, CHBr3 in these regions shows larger variability and less clear seasonality, presenting larger mixing ratios in winter and autumn in NH midlatitudes to high latitudes.The lowermost stratosphere of SH and NH shows a very similar distribution of CH2Br2 in hemispheric spring with differences well below 0.1 ppt, while the differences in hemispheric autumn are much larger with substantially smaller values in the SH than in the NH.This suggests that transport processes may be different in both hemispheric autumn seasons, which implies that the influx of tropospheric air (“flushing”) into the NH lowermost stratosphere is more efficient than in the SH.The observations of CHBr3 support the suggestion, with a steeper vertical gradient in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in SH autumn than in NH autumn.However, the SH database is insufficient to quantify this difference.We further compare the observations to model estimates of TOMCAT (Toulouse Off-line Model of Chemistry And Transport) and CAM-Chem (Community Atmosphere Model with Chemistry, version 4), both using the same emission inventory of Ordóñez et al. (2012).The pronounced tropospheric seasonality of CH2Br2 in the SH is not reproduced by the models,presumably due to erroneous seasonal emissions or atmospheric photochemical decomposition efficiencies.In contrast, model simulations of CHBr3 show a pronounced seasonality in both hemispheres, which is not confirmed by observations.The distributions of both species in the lowermost stratosphere of the Northern and Southern hemispheres are overall well captured by the models with the exception of southern hemispheric autumn,where both models present a bias that maximizes in the lowest 40 K above the tropopause, with considerably lower mixing ratios in the observations.Thus, both models reproduce equivalent flushing in both hemispheres, which is not confirmed by the limited available observations.Our study emphasizes the need for more extensive observations in the SH to fully understand the impact of CH2Br2 and CHBr3 on lowermost-stratospheric ozone loss and to help constrain emissions.more » « less