An official website of the United States government
Abstract The eddy covariance (EC) method is one of the most widely used approaches to quantify surface‐atmosphere fluxes. However, scaling up from a single EC tower to the landscape remains an open challenge. To address this, we used 63 site years of data to examine simulated annual and growing season sums of carbon fluxes from three paired land‐cover type sites of corn, restored‐prairie, and switchgrass ecosystems. This was also done across the landscape by modeling fluxes using different land‐cover type input data. An artificial neural network (ANN) approach was used to model net ecosystem exchange (NEE), ecosystem respiration (Reco), and gross primary production (GPP) at one paired site using environmental observations from the second site only. With a mean spatial separation of 11 km between paired sites, we were able to model annual sums of NEE,Reco, and GPP with uncertainties of 20%, 22%, and 8%, respectively, relative to observation sums. When considering the growing season only, model uncertainties were 17%, 22%, and 9%, respectively for the three flux terms. We also show that ANN models can estimate sums ofRecoand GPP fluxes without needing the constraint of similar land‐cover‐type, with annual uncertainties of 12% and 10%. These results provide new insights to scaling up observations from one EC site beyond the footprint of the EC tower to multiple land‐cover types across the landscape.
more »
« less
Resolving heterogeneous fluxes from tundra halves the growing season carbon budget
Abstract. Landscapes are often assumed to be homogeneous when interpreting eddy covariance fluxes, which can lead to biases when gap-filling and scaling up observations to determine regional carbon budgets. Tundra ecosystems are heterogeneous at multiple scales. Plant functional types, soil moisture, thaw depth, and microtopography, for example, vary across the landscape and influence net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) fluxes. With warming temperatures, Arctic ecosystems are changing from a net sink to a net source of carbon to the atmosphere in some locations, but the Arctic's carbon balance remains highly uncertain. In this study we report results from growing season NEE and CH4 fluxes from an eddy covariance tower in the Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta in Alaska. We used footprint models and Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods to unmix eddy covariance observations into constituent land-cover fluxes based on high-resolution land-cover maps of the region. We compared three types of footprint models and used two land-cover maps with varying complexity to determine the effects of these choices on derived ecosystem fluxes. We used artificially created gaps of withheld observations to compare gap-filling performance using our derived land-cover-specific fluxes and traditional gap-filling methods that assume homogeneous landscapes. We also compared resulting regional carbon budgets when scaling up observations using heterogeneous and homogeneous approaches. Traditional gap-filling methods performed worse at predicting artificially withheld gaps in NEE than those that accounted for heterogeneous landscapes, while there were only slight differences between footprint models and land-cover maps. We identified and quantified hot spots of carbon fluxes in the landscape (e.g., late growing season emissions from wetlands and small ponds). We resolved distinct seasonality in tundra growing season NEE fluxes. Scaling while assuming a homogeneous landscape overestimated the growing season CO2 sink by a factor of 2 and underestimated CH4 emissions by a factor of 2 when compared to scaling with any method that accounts for landscape heterogeneity. We show how Bayesian MCMC, analytical footprint models, and high-resolution land-cover maps can be leveraged to derive detailed land-cover carbon fluxes from eddy covariance time series. These results demonstrate the importance of landscape heterogeneity when scaling carbon emissions across the Arctic.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10569289
- Publisher / Repository:
- EGU publications
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Biogeosciences
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 5
- ISSN:
- 1726-4189
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1301 to 1321
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Eddy covariance measurements quantify the magnitude and temporal variability of land-atmosphere exchanges of water, heat, and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) among others. However, they also carry information regarding the influence of spatial heterogeneity within the flux footprint, the temporally dynamic source/sink area that contributes to the measured fluxes. A 25 m tall eddy covariance flux tower in Central Illinois, USA, a region where drastic seasonal land cover changes from intensive agriculture of maize and soybean occur, provides a unique setting to explore how the organized heterogeneity of row crop agriculture contributes to observations of land-atmosphere exchange. We characterize the effects of this heterogeneity on latent heat ( LE ), sensible heat ( H ), and CO 2 fluxes ( F c ) using a combined flux footprint and eco-hydrological modeling approach. We estimate the relative contribution of each crop type resulting from the structured spatial organization of the land cover to the observed fluxes from April 2016 to April 2019. We present the concept of a fetch rose, which represents the frequency of the location and length of the prevalent upwind distance contributing to the observations. The combined action of hydroclimatological drivers and land cover heterogeneity within the dynamic flux footprint explain interannual flux variations. We find that smaller flux footprints associated with unstable conditions are more likely to be dominated by a single crop type, but both crops typically influence any given flux measurement. Meanwhile, our ecohydrological modeling suggests that land cover heterogeneity leads to a greater than 10% difference in flux magnitudes for most time windows relative to an assumption of equally distributed crop types. This study shows how the observed flux magnitudes and variability depend on the organized land cover heterogeneity and is extensible to other intensively managed or otherwise heterogeneous landscapes.more » « less
-
The main impetus for this study is to answer the following questions: (i) What are the net late summer and autumn seasonal fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) across the North Slope and coastal Arctic Ocean? Using the van we will be able to measure fluxes in the late summer and autumn along the Dalton highway and connecting roads. While this will not be across the North Slope of Alaska from a longitudinal prospective, we will be able to sample most of the different ecotopes found there and sample into the foothills region. From this and surface ecotope maps we will still be able to derive a net flux and compare with other estimates in the literature. As a bonus, we will plan to acquire data on the transit drive between Boston and Alaska providing a cross-continental snapshot of emissions to compare with the emissions from permafrost. (ii) What are the primary surface land classes and associated mechanisms that contribute to these fluxes? Again, along the Dalton highway we will have access to sampling from rivers, wet sedge, mesic sedge, lakes, tussock tundra, dwarf shrub, among others. Though in extent we will sample less area, we will have better precision from the areas we do sample. We will also be able to operate in a fixed mode (parked vehicle) to increase our precision even further for isotopic measurements which are tied to mechanistic information. (iii) What remotely-sensed products are the best proxy for the physical and biological processes that regulate the net flux of methane and carbon dioxide and how do these vary regionally? This question we will be able to address in the same manner as proposed using our modeling capabilities and available remote products from satellites. (iv) How do the answers to the above questions vary depending on the scale of measurements used from local measurements up to regional scale inversion models? We will be able to answer this question in much the same way as proposed, but will only be able to scale from local to landscape scales. This dataset covers the Flux Observations of Carbon from an Automotive Laboratory (FOCAL) 2024 campaign. It includes two continuous eddy covariance towers set up on the North Slope south of Prudhoe Bay in 2023 and 2024. It also includes discontinuous eddy covariance measurements from 4 sites using a mobile tower van laboratory. The motivation of the campaign was to focus on late season carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide fluxes from various ecotypes along a North - South transect of the North Slope, AK. By measuring gas fluxes from different sites as the season progressed from summer to early winter we hoped to better understand how the permafrost is changing in terms of gas emissions. We also hoped to better quantify late season emissions which have been shown to be an important source of methane emissions from the Arctic region. We used eddy covariance to measure the gas fluxes combining sonic anemometers for the 3D wind with spectrometers tuned to the different gases of interest. The two towers used commercial instrumentation from LiCOR and Cambridge Scientific and the mobile tower used custom built spectrometers and a Gil Windmaster.more » « less
-
Abstract. Understanding the sources and sinks of methane (CH4)is critical to both predicting and mitigating future climate change. Thereare large uncertainties in the global budget of atmospheric CH4, butnatural emissions are estimated to be of a similar magnitude toanthropogenic emissions. To understand CH4 flux from biogenic sourcesin the United States (US) of America, a multi-scale CH4 observationnetwork focused on CH4 flux rates, processes, and scaling methods isrequired. This can be achieved with a network of ground-based observationsthat are distributed based on climatic regions and land cover. To determinethe gaps in physical infrastructure for developing this network, we need tounderstand the landscape representativeness of the current infrastructure.We focus here on eddy covariance (EC) flux towers because they are essentialfor a bottom-up framework that bridges the gap between point-based chambermeasurements and airborne or satellite platforms that inform policydecisions and global climate agreements. Using dissimilarity,multidimensional scaling, and cluster analysis, the US was divided into 10clusters distributed across temperature and precipitation gradients. Weevaluated dissimilarity within each cluster for research sites with activeCH4 EC towers to identify gaps in existing infrastructure that limitour ability to constrain the contribution of US biogenic CH4 emissionsto the global budget. Through our analysis using climate, land cover, andlocation variables, we identified priority areas for research infrastructureto provide a more complete understanding of the CH4 flux potential ofecosystem types across the US. Clusters corresponding to Alaska and theRocky Mountains, which are inherently difficult to capture, are the mostpoorly represented, and all clusters require a greater representation ofvegetation types.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Forest carbon sequestration offset protocols have been employed for more than 20 years with limited success in slowing deforestation and increasing forest carbon trading volume. Direct measurement of forest carbon flux improves quantification for trading but has not been applied to forest carbon research projects with more than 600 site installations worldwide. In this study, we apply carbon accounting methods, scaling hours to decades to 28-years of scientific CO2 eddy covariance data for the Harvard Forest (US-Ha1), located in central Massachusetts, USA, establishing commercial carbon trading protocols and applications for similar sites. We illustrate and explain transactions of high-frequency direct measurement for CO2 net ecosystem exchange (NEE, gC m−2 year−1) that track and monetize ecosystem carbon dynamics in contrast to approaches that rely on forest mensuration and growth models. NEE, based on eddy covariance methodology, quantifies loss of CO2 by ecosystem respiration accounted for as an unavoidable debit to net carbon sequestration. Retrospective analysis of the US-Ha1 NEE times series including carbon pricing, interval analysis, and ton-year exit accounting and revenue scenarios inform entrepreneur, investor, and landowner forest carbon commercialization strategies. CO2 efflux accounts for ~45% of US-Ha1 NEE, or an error of ~466% if excluded; however, the decades-old coupled human and natural system remains a financially viable net carbon sink. We introduce isoflux NEE for t13C16O2 and t12C18O16O to directly partition and quantify daytime ecosystem respiration and photosynthesis, creating new soil carbon commerce applications and derivative products in contrast to undifferentiated bulk soil carbon pool approaches. Eddy covariance NEE methods harmonize and standardize carbon commerce across diverse forest applications including, a New England, USA regional eddy covariance network, the Paris Agreement, and related climate mitigation platforms.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1301-2024
