More Like this

1. Oxygen optodes on oceanographic moorings: recommendations for deployment and in situ calibration

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1441976  

   Miller, Una Kim; Fogaren, Kristen E; Atamanchuk, Dariia; Johnson, Clare; Koelling, Jannes; Le_Bras, Isabela; Lindeman, Margaret; Nagao, Hiroki; Nicholson, David P; Palevsky, Hilary; et al (November 2024, Frontiers in Marine Science)

   Increasing interest in the deployment of optical oxygen sensors, or optodes, on oceanographic moorings reflects the value of dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements in studies of physical and biogeochemical processes. Optodes are well-suited for moored applications but require careful, multi-step calibrations in the field to ensure data accuracy. Without a standardized set of protocols, this can be an obstacle for science teams lacking expertise in optode data processing and calibration. Here, we provide a set of recommendations for the deployment andin situcalibration of data from moored optodes, developed from our experience working with a set of 60 optodes deployed as part of the Gases in the Overturning and Horizontal circulation of the Subpolar North Atlantic Program (GOHSNAP). In particular, we detail the correction of drift in moored optodes, which occurs in two forms: (i) an irreversible, time-dependent drift that occurs during both optode storage and deployment and (ii) a reversible and pressure-and-time-dependent drift that is detectable in some optodes deployed at depths greater than 1,000 m. The latter is virtually unidentified in the literature yet appears to cause a low-bias in measured DO on the order of 1 to 3µmol kg⁻¹per 1,000 m of depth, appearing as an exponential decay over the first days to months of deployment. Comparisons of our calibrated DO time series against serendipitous mid-deployment conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD)-DO profiles, as well as biogeochemical (BGC)-ARGO float profiles, suggest the protocols described here yield an accuracy in optode-DO of ∼1%, or approximately 2.5 to 3µmol kg⁻¹. We intend this paper to serve as both documentation of the current best practices in the deployment of moored optodes as well as a guide for science teams seeking to collect high-quality moored oxygen data, regardless of expertise. 

   more » « less
2. Oxygen data from Eastern Tropical North Pacific cruises and floats 2021-2022

   https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8kprr4xwk  

   D'Asaro, Eric; Altabet, Mark; McNeil, Craig; Garcia-Robledo, Emilio (January 2024, Dryad)

   Using standard calibration schemes commercial oxygen optode sensors typically yield oxygen concentrations in the range of 2-4 umol/kg under anoxic conditions. They are thus unable to detect the roughly 0.1 umol/kg levels of oceanic functional anoxia. Here, a modified Stern-Volmer equation is used to characterize and calibrate 26 optodes deployed on 16 autonomous floats in the Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETNP) oxygen deficient zone (ODZ) using a combination of manufacturers', laboratory, and in-situ data. Laboratory calibrations lasting several months and conducted over 2 years show that optodes kept under anoxic conditions drift at rates of order 0.2 umol/kg/yr, with much higher drifts in the first month. The initial transient is plausibly due to the degassing of plastic components of the optodes and might be reduced by replacing these with metal. Oxygen concentrations measured by these calibrated optodes in the nearly anoxic ODZ core of the ETNP deviated from both the laboratory calibrations and ship-based STOX measurements by similar amounts. Thus with current sensors, an in-situ anoxic oxygen calibration only once or twice a year is needed to maintain an accuracy close to 0.2 umol/kg. An algorithm to find the anoxic cores of the ETNP ODZ is developed and used to remove the drift in the float optodes to this accuracy. This is an order-of-magnitude improvement in the low oxygen performance of the optodes and could be implemented on the existing database of Argo oxygen floats to map the geography of functional anoxia. This dataset contains the raw float data, the float data calibrated using the manufacturers’ schemes and our new scheme. The calibration points and our final calibration constants, as well as the STOX data used to validate our new calibrations, are included. Data was collected on 10 custom-built profiling 'ODZ' floats equipped with oxygen optodes and gas tension devices and on 6 standard Argo floats with oxygen sensors. Argo data was processed by Argo and recalibrated at APL/UW. ODZ float data was processed at APL/UW as described in the associated manuscript. # Oxygen data from Eastern Tropical North Pacific cruises and floats 2021-2022 [https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8kprr4xwk](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8kprr4xwk) ## Description of the data and file structure ## **ODZ Level2.zip** contains scientific data for the ODZ floats converted from raw data using nominal calibrations. Level_2 in NASAspeak. A README, Diagnostic plots, and a Matlab conversion program are included.  The script ***MRVFloatDecode_2023.m*** reads the raw files for the ODZ floats and puts them in a single Matlab file **xo110-.mat** where the first is the float number and the second is the boot number. It makes lots of plots, which I also include. Matlab substructures and variables are: ***CTD*** – Structure containing Seabird 41CT data * P, T, S – pressure [dbar], temperature [deg C], practica salinity as computed by Seabird [psu] * time, mtime – time in Matlab datetime and datenum formats * SA, CT, Sig0 – Absolute salinity [g/kg], conservative temperature [deg C], potential density [kg/m^3] * CC, W, Drag–estimated oil volume [cc], vertical velocity [m/s], Drag force (for ballasting) [N] ***GPS*** – position * time, mtime - time as Matlab datetime, Matlab datnum * lat,lon- location degrees latitude, degrees longitude * nsat, hdop – number of satellites, horizontal dilution of precision ***GTD*** – Gas Tension Sensor * time, mtime - time as Matlab datetime, Matlab datnum, * P, T, S, Sig0 – Pressure [dbar], temperature [deg C], practical salinity [psu], potential density [kg/m^3] * GT – gas tension [mbar] * Tgtd – temperature of GTD [ deg C]  * Ref- time [matlab datenum], temperature [deg C], pressure [mbar] for reference sensor * Other variables are calibration constants and check values. ***SBE5M1,SBE5M2*** - status of pumps. 1 is for optode(1) and GTD. 2 is for reference optod  ***oldGTD*** - One float had an old-style GTD for reference.  ***optode*** - SBE63 optodes (1) is water optode, (2) is reference optode * time, time -time as Matlab datum and date time * SN – optode serial number * red_amp, blue_amp- amplitudes of red and blue LEDs [counts] * red-phase, blue-phase- phases [microvolts] of fluorescence phase. * O2phase- their difference [microvolts] used to compute oxygen * T – optode temperature [deg C] * O2uM – optode’s computed oxygen concentration converted to uMol/kg. * Tctd, S, P, Sig0 – CTD interpolated to optode time - temperature [deg C], practical salinity [psu], pressure [dbar], potential density [kg/m^3] ***ADC, AirPump, AirValve, OilPump,*** ***OilValve*** - structures diagnosing the buoyancy system operations. Scientfically uninteresting. ## ***STOX Oxygen Profiles.zip*** Contains high precision oxygen profiles taken on the two Sally Ride cruises using STOX oxygen sensors. The data is provided as .txt and .mat formats along with miscellaneous data from the CTD. Oxygen measurements from the floats were referenced to STOX oxygen profiles taken from the ship on the two cruises because these provide much more stable and high precision measurements. STOX sensors are described in detail in Revsbech, N. P.; Larsen, L. H.; Gundersen, J.; Dalsgaard, T.; Ulloa, O. and Thamdrup, B. ( 2009) Determination of ultra‐low oxygen concentrations in oxygen minimum zones by the STOX sensor. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 7, pp.371-381. DOI:10.4319/lom.2009.7.371. And from their manufacturer [https://unisense.com/products/stox-microsensor/](https://unisense.com/products/stox-microsensor/) STOX data was collected on two cruises of the research vessel, Sally Ride, SR 2114 and SR2011. Data from each CTD cast with a STOX profile is in a separate folder in this archive. In each, the raw data is in a ****.txt*** file and the converted Matlab data is in a ****.mat*** file. MATLAB scripts to read the ****.mat*** file are included in each folder. Data names and units are: Ship Cruise Station Cast Year Month Day Hour Minute * Depth [m] * Latitude [deg]  * Longitude [deg] * Density [sigma-theta,kg/m^3]  * Temperature [ºC]  * Salinity * Beam Attenuation [1/m] * Fluorescence [mg Chla/m3]  * PAR [umol/m2/s] * Oxygen_SBE [µmol/kg]) * Oxygen_STOX [µmol/kg] * STOX_SD [µmol/kg] * STOX_n [µmol/kg] * NO3-Suna [uM] ## **Optode Calibration.zip**  Contains all of the calibration data used to calibrate the optodes including the anoxic laboratory points, the manufacturers' calibration points, and the coefficients of the calibration model for each optode.  **Seabird 63 Optodes** Anoxic calibration data and model fit are in ***AnoxicCalibration/SBE63/2020/*** and ***/2021/***. The 2020 data was used in the final calibration. * Files are *******Tau0model.mat*** where **** is the optode serial number * Variable ***meta*** explains each variable, repeated here. Calibration model is '1./Taup.*exp(-(Etau+Etau2.*(K-283.15).^2)/R/K )*(1+Drift *(days since start) )' Variables are * Taup: 'Phase [uS]' * Etau: 'Energy is Etau+Etau2*(T-10C) [J/mol] * Drift: 'Drift coefficient in the model [1/days] * Ttau: 'Time scale of drift [days] * Drift_uSday: 'Model Drift uS/day' * Dcal: 'Robust Drift. The drift line is Dcal(2)+ Dcal(1)*(Yearday of 2021) in uMol. Drift is Dcal(1) [uMol/day] * Drms: 'RMS drift fit error [uS] * Derr: 'Uncertainty in Dcal; Drift uncertainty is Derr(1) [uMol/day]'  Calibration points from the anoxic tank are in structure ***RawS.*** Variable ***meta*** explains each variable, repeated here. * K: 'Temperature [Kelvin]' * O2phase: 'O2 phase tau [uS]' * R: 'Gas constant [J/K/mol] * dyd: 'Time since start of record [days]' * TIME: 'Time [matlab datetime] * Omodel: 'Tau computed from model with drift [uS] * OmodelND: 'Tau computed from model with drift removed [uS] **Full Calibration/** contains the oxic calibration points and calibration coefficients Calibration points from Seabird supplied with optode are in **SBE63/*FactoryCalibration/ ****_dd_mmm_yyyy.mat ***where **** is the optode serial number. The calibration date follows. Variables are * Caltime - Calibration time [matlab datum] * ID - Serial number * O2in_mll - Oxygen in tank from winklers [ml/L] * O2out_mll - Oxygen computed from Seabird calibration [ml/L] * S - Salinity [psu] * T - Temperature [deg C] * resid_mll - model residual [ml/L] * tau_us - optode phase lag [microseconds] The oxic part of the optode model calibration coefficients are in ***SBE63/Calfiles/*** Calibration model, coefficients, and check values are in ***Calfiles/_oxic_model.mat*** where **** is the optode SN Data is in structure ***Kfile*** ***Kfile.meta*** explains the variables, repeated here. Model is pO2=eta/K(T) * (1 + a(T)*eta^2.3)^q(T) ; eta= tau0(T)/tau-1.  Note that tau0(T) is computed from *******_Tau0model.mat*** coefficients above. Variables are * Check: 'Test values of T, Tau, and pO2 from SBE cal' * Lk: 'K(T)=polyval(Lk, T) - Matlab call to compute K from Lk polynomial coefficients and T [deg C] * La: 'a(T)=polyval(La,T)' * Lq: 'q(T)=polyval(Lq,T)' **Aanderaa 4330 Optodes** **Anoxic calibration** data and model fit is in ***AnoxicCalibration/AA/*** \**                  **File names and formats are the same as for SBE63 optodes **Full Calibration/AA** **/Factory Calibrations** contains the calibration information supplied with the optodes Files are *******_dd-mmm-yyyy.mat*** with the same format as for the SBE63 The relevant variables are: * Caltime - Calibration time [matlab datenum] * ID - Serial number of optode * O2in_uMol - Calibration bath oxygen [uMol/L] * S - Salinity [psu] * T - Temperature from optode [deg C] * tau_deg - optode output phase [degrees] * meta - Misc information **/Calfiles/********_M0_oxic_model.mat** contain oxic part of the optode model calibration coefficients The format is the same as for SBE63, but there is an extra variable * eta_off: Add this to eta to account for drift since calibration [uS] ## **Calibrated Oxygen.zip** contains both uncalibrated and calibrated optode data for both the ODZ and Argo floats. A README file and Matlab processing programs are included. /***SBE63/xo110**-***.mat*** contain the calibrated data for **ODZ float xo110** Format and data is identical to that in the ***optode*** structure in ***ODZ_Level2_Mat,*** but with 2 extra variables * pO2 – partial pressure of oxygen [mbar] in uncalibrated data * Cal – a structure containing calibrated data -- FINAL DATA IS HERE * pO2: partial pressure of oxygen [mbar] in calibrated data  * Tau0m: Calibration model of anoxic phase [microsecond]. Includes offset. * Tau: Measured phase [microsecond] * Tauoff: offset in Tau from in situ calibration [uS] * eta: (Tau0m+Tauoff)/Tau-1 * O2uM: oxygen concentration [micromoles/kg] * O2umol: same Note that optode(1) is the water oxygen. Optode(2) is a reference optode, which is not of scientific interest.  **/SBE63/Reprocess_SBE63.m** is a MATLAB script showing how to combine calibration data and float data to make calibrated data for SBE63 optodes **/AA/Mat/*FloatID*/*FloatID_profilenum*.mat** contains Argo float data from float FloatID, profile number profilenum. Variables are Data from Argos float archive * mtime, time - time in datetime and datenum formats * lat, lon - GPS position latitude degrees and longitude degrees * P, T, S - CTD pressure [dbar], temperature [deg C], salinity [psu] * Optode - Optode serial number * O2T - Optode temperature [deg C] * O2phase - Optode phase [degrees] * O2umol - Optode oxygen [micromole/kg] Added variables * Kfile - Structure as in Optode Calibration files. Kfile.meta also has metadata * Cal - Structure containing calibrated optode data on the same timebase * Tau - measured phase [degrees] * Tau0m - Model anoxic phase [degrees] * Tauoff - Offset from laboratory calibration [degrees]. Includes offset & drift. * Drift - Drift [degrees/year] * mtime0 - base time for drift [matlab datenum format] * eta - Tau0m/Tau-1 * pO2 - Calibrated Oxygen partial pressure [mbar] * O2umol - Calibrated Oxygen concentration [micromole/kg] * meta - similar list to this one. * SN - same as Optode * Float - FloatID **/AA/Mat/*FloatID*/*FloatID_profilenum*.xls** contains the calibrated data in Excel format ***/AA/Reprocess_3_AA.m*** is a MATLAB script showing how to combine calibration data and float data to make calibrated data for AA optodes ## ***ODZ Raw\.zip*** contains the raw data from 9 custom-built ODZ floats. Level_1 in NASAspeak. They can be read by ***MRVFloatDecode_2023.m*** included in ***ODZ Level 2 files*** ## Code/Software Processing and reading scripts in Matlab (24.1.0.2628055 (R2024a) Update 4) are provided. 

   more » « less
3. Autonomous Observation of Seasonal Carbonate Chemistry Dynamics in the Mid‐Atlantic Bight

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016505  

   Wright‐Fairbanks, Elizabeth K.; Miles, Travis N.; Cai, Wei‐Jun; Chen, Baoshan; Saba, Grace K. (November 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans)

   Abstract Ocean acidification alters the oceanic carbonate system, increasing potential for ecological, economic, and cultural losses. Historically, productive coastal oceans lack vertically resolved high‐resolution carbonate system measurements on time scales relevant to organism ecology and life history. The recent development of a deep ion‐sensitive field‐effect transistor (ISFET)‐based pH sensor system integrated into a Slocum glider has provided a platform for achieving high‐resolution carbonate system profiles. From May 2018 to November 2019, seasonal deployments of the pH glider were conducted in the central Mid‐Atlantic Bight. Simultaneous measurements from the glider's pH and salinity sensors enabled the derivation of total alkalinity and calculation of other carbonate system parameters including aragonite saturation state. Carbonate system parameters were then mapped against other variables, such as temperature, dissolved oxygen, and chlorophyll, over space and time. The seasonal dynamics of carbonate chemistry presented here provide a baseline to begin identifying drivers of acidification in this vital economic zone. 

   more » « less
4. A Highly Sensitive and Long‐Term Stable Wearable Patch for Continuous Analysis of Biomarkers in Sweat

   https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202306117  

   Lorestani, Farnaz; Zhang, Xianzhe; Abdullah, Abu_Musa; Xin, Xin; Liu, Yushen; Rahman, Md_Mashfiqur; Biswas, Md_Abu_Sayeed; Li, Bowen; Dutta, Ankan; Niu, Zhenyuan; et al (September 2023, Advanced Functional Materials)

   Abstract Although increasing efforts have been devoted to the development of non‐invasive wearable electrochemical sweat sensors for monitoring physiological and metabolic information, most of them still suffer from poor stability and specificity over time and fluctuating temperatures. This study reports the design and fabrication of a long‐term stable and highly sensitive flexible electrochemical sensor based on nanocomposite‐modified porous graphene by facile laser treatment for detecting biomarkers such as glucose in sweat. The laser‐reduced and patterned stable conductive nanocomposite on the porous graphene electrode provides the resulting glucose sensor with an excellent sensitivity of 1317.69 µA mm⁻¹cm⁻²and an ultra‐low limit of detection of 0.079 µm. The sensor can also detect pH and exhibit extraordinary stability to maintain more than 91% sensitivity over 21 days in ambient conditions. Taken together with a temperature sensor based on the same material system, the dual glucose and pH sensor integrated with a flexible microfluidic sweat sampling network further results in accurate continuous on‐body glucose detection calibrated by the simultaneously measured pH and temperature. The low‐cost, highly sensitive, and long‐term stable platform could facilitate the early identification and continuous monitoring of different biomarkers for non‐invasive disease diagnosis and treatment evaluation. 

   more » « less
5. Bioadhesive interface for marine sensors on diverse soft fragile species

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46833-4  

   Duque_Londono, Camilo; Cones, Seth F; Deng, Jue; Wu, Jingjing; Yuk, Hyunwoo; Guza, David E; Mooney, T Aran; Zhao, Xuanhe (December 2024, Nature Communications)

   Abstract Marine animals equipped with sensors provide vital information for understanding their ecophysiology and collect oceanographic data on climate change and for resource management. Existing methods for attaching sensors to marine animals mostly rely on invasive physical anchors, suction cups, and rigid glues. These methods can suffer from limitations, particularly for adhering to soft fragile marine species such as squid and jellyfish, including slow complex operations, unreliable fixation, tissue trauma, and behavior changes of the animals. However, soft fragile marine species constitute a significant portion of ocean biomass (>38.3 teragrams of carbon) and global commercial fisheries. Here we introduce a soft hydrogel-based bioadhesive interface for marine sensors that can provide rapid (time <22 s), robust (interfacial toughness >160 J m⁻²), and non-invasive adhesion on various marine animals. Reliable and rapid adhesion enables large-scale, multi-animal sensor deployments to study biomechanics, collective behaviors, interspecific interactions, and concurrent multi-species activity. These findings provide a promising method to expand a burgeoning research field of marine bio-sensing from large marine mammals and fishes to small, soft, and fragile marine animals. 

   more » « less