An official website of the United States government
Climate change may be a major threat to biodiversity in the next 100 years. Although there has been important work on mechanisms of decline in some species, it generally remains unclear which changes in climate actually cause extinctions, and how many species will likely be lost. Here, we identify the specific changes in climate that are associated with the widespread local extinctions that have already occurred. We then use this information to predict the extent of future biodiversity loss and to identify which processes may forestall extinction. We used data from surveys of 538 plant and animal species over time, 44% of which have already had local extinctions at one or more sites. We found that locations with local extinctions had larger and faster changes in hottest yearly temperatures than those without. Surprisingly, sites with local extinctions had significantly smaller changes in mean annual temperatures, despite the widespread use of mean annual temperatures as proxies for overall climate change. Based on their past rates of dispersal, we estimate that 57–70% of these 538 species will not disperse quickly enough to avoid extinction. However, we show that niche shifts appear to be far more important for avoiding extinction than dispersal, although most studies focus only on dispersal. Specifically, considering both dispersal and niche shifts, we project that only 16–30% of these 538 species may go extinct by 2070. Overall, our results help identify the specific climatic changes that cause extinction and the processes that may help species to survive.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on December 6, 2025
Climate change extinctions
Climate change is expected to cause irreversible changes to biodiversity, but predicting those risks remains uncertain. I synthesized 485 studies and more than 5 million projections to produce a quantitative global assessment of climate change extinctions. With increased certainty, this meta-analysis suggests that extinctions will accelerate rapidly if global temperatures exceed 1.5°C. The highest-emission scenario would threaten approximately one-third of species, globally. Amphibians; species from mountain, island, and freshwater ecosystems; and species inhabiting South America, Australia, and New Zealand face the greatest threats. In line with predictions, climate change has contributed to an increasing proportion of observed global extinctions since 1970. Besides limiting greenhouse gases, pinpointing which species to protect first will be critical for preserving biodiversity until anthropogenic climate change is halted and reversed.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10570308
- Publisher / Repository:
- Science
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Science
- Volume:
- 386
- Issue:
- 6726
- ISSN:
- 0036-8075
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1123 to 1128
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Global biodiversity is diminishing rapidly. The number of accepted “background” extinction rates range from 0.1 to 4 species per million per year. However, some authors have noted an increase in extinctions to 150–260 species per million per year since 1500. As the largely anthropogenic-induced global biodiversity crisis progresses, an abundance of taxa are faced with changing environments, decreasing population sizes, and/or extinction. Concerning amphibians, at least 43% of all species are experiencing population declines, with the 2008 Global Amphibian Assessment showing that 32% of all amphibian species are threatened or extinct. Populations of high-alpine amphibians in the southern Rocky Mountain region (i.e., Boreal toads [Anaxyrus boreas boreas], Tiger salamanders [Ambystoma mavortium], and Boreal chorus frogs [Pseudacris maculata]) have swiftly declined in recent decades due to high 649 susceptibility to diseases (e.g., Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and ranaviruses) and changing environmental conditions. This study will focus on the effects of climate change by examining the habitat of these three amphibious species. A Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) model is a commonly used machine-learning method of creating SDMs by accounting for the most uniform distribution and the provided predictors. Well-fitted models can be produced for different climatic scenarios by including climatic and environmental factors, or predictors, relevant to the species of interest, appropriately adjusting the regularization parameter and active feature classes for each model, and properly evaluating the models. By adopting this method of SDMs along with a decadal time-series approach, we demonstrate a larger-scale pattern of potential habitat shifts over time in this alpine habitat caused by climate change.more » « less
-
Abstract AimWe investigate geographic patterns across taxonomic, ecological and phylogenetic diversity to test for spatial (in)congruency and identify aggregate diversity hotspots in relationship to present land use and future climate. Simulating extinctions of imperilled species, we demonstrate where losses across diversity dimensions and geography are predicted. LocationNorth America. Time periodPresent day, future. Major taxa studiedRodentia. MethodsUsing geographic range maps for rodent species, we quantified spatial patterns for 11 dimensions of diversity: taxonomic (species, range weighted), ecological (body size, diet and habitat), phylogenetic (mean, variance, and nearest‐neighbour patristic distances, phylogenetic distance and genus‐to‐species ratio) and phyloendemism. We tested for correlations across dimensions and used spatial residual analyses to illustrate regions of pronounced diversity. We aggregated diversity hotspots in relationship to predictions of land‐use and climate change and recalculated metrics following extinctions of IUCN‐listed imperilled species. ResultsTopographically complex western North America hosts high diversity across multiple dimensions: phyloendemism and ecological diversity exceed predictions based on taxonomic richness, and phylogenetic variance patterns indicate steep gradients in phylogenetic turnover. An aggregate diversity hotspot emerges in the west, whereas spatial incongruence exists across diversity dimensions at the continental scale. Notably, phylogenetic metrics are uncorrelated with ecological diversity. Diversity hotspots overlap with land‐use and climate change, and extinctions predicted by IUCN status are unevenly distributed across space, phylogeny or ecological groups. Main conclusionsComparison of taxonomic, ecological and phylogenetic diversity patterns for North American rodents clearly shows the multifaceted nature of biodiversity. Testing for geographic patterns and (in)congruency across dimensions of diversity facilitates investigation into underlying ecological and evolutionary processes. The geographic scope of this analysis suggests that several explicit regional challenges face North American rodent fauna in the future. Simultaneous consideration of multi‐dimensional biodiversity allows us to assess what critical functions or evolutionary history we might lose with future extinctions and maximize the potential of our conservation efforts.more » « less
-
Abstract Climate change is negatively impacting ecosystems and their contributions to human well‐being, known as ecosystem services. Previous research has mainly focused on the direct effects of climate change on species and ecosystem services, leaving a gap in understanding the indirect impacts resulting from changes in species interactions within complex ecosystems. This knowledge gap is significant because the loss of a species in a food web can lead to additional species losses or “co‐extinctions,” particularly when the species most impacted by climate change are also the species that play critical roles in food web persistence or provide ecosystem services. Here, we present a framework to investigate the relationships among species vulnerability to climate change, their roles within the food web, their contributions to ecosystem services, and the overall persistence of these systems and services in the face of climate‐induced species losses. To do this, we assess the robustness of food webs and their associated ecosystem services to climate‐driven species extinctions in eight empirical rocky intertidal food webs. Across food webs, we find that highly connected species are not the most vulnerable to climate change. However, we find species that directly provide ecosystem services are more vulnerable to climate change and more connected than species that do not directly provide services, which results in ecosystem service provision collapsing before food webs. Overall, we find that food webs are more robust to climate change than the ecosystem services they provide and show that combining species roles in food webs and services with their vulnerability to climate change offer predictions about the impacts of co‐extinctions for future food web and ecosystem service persistence. However, these conclusions are limited by data availability and quality, underscoring the need for more comprehensive data collection on linking species roles in interaction networks and their vulnerabilities to climate change.more » « less
-
Preservation of genetic diversity is critical to the resilience of species in the face of global change. To meet international calls to preserve at least 90% of species’ genetic diversity, researchers and conservationists need a way to reliably predict genetic diversity loss resulting from human activities ( 1 ). On page 1431 of this issue, Exposito-Alonso et al. present a mathematical framework that elegantly bridges biodiversity and population genetics theory to model the relationship between genetic diversity and habitat loss ( 2 ). This approach builds on methods already used by biodiversity policy experts for predicting species extinctions based on habitat loss ( 3 ) and should be useful to those tasked with setting goals for preserving genetic diversity.more » « less
