An official website of the United States government
The recent decade has seen a rise in community resilience modeling, including a quest to model infrastructure resilience (its exposure, damage, and restoration) under extreme events. These efforts entail measuring, visualizing, and probing alternatives to support mitigation, recovery, and resilience-enhancing interventions. However, the practice demands developing different input sub-models, considering various layers of uncertainty, and integrating these for the final assessment. In this project, we present how the resources of the DesignSafe Cyberinfrastructure (DesignSafe-CI) can support such efforts. We present different tools that can be leveraged from DesignSafe directly or through its interoperability with other platforms, such as the Interdependent Networked Community Resilience Modeling Environment (IN-CORE). We present illustrative examples of how to leverage publicly available data in DesignSafe-CI and models within the IN-CORE platform to create an infrastructure resilience assessment pipeline. These examples are developed and analyzed using JupyterLab in DesignSafe. Furthermore, we present how JupyterLab HPC in DesignSafe-CI enhances the modeling and testing capabilities as the analysis of larger infrastructure systems (e.g., detailed transportation networks) becomes feasible. While the illustrative example uses earthquakes as the hazard type, the leveraged tools, platforms, and shared codes can be adapted to multiple hazards. This project is created to share the material presented on December 11 (2024) in the DesignSafe Webinar "Resilience Assessment of Community Infrastructure: Leveraging HPC Resources at DesignSafe-CI and Interoperability with IN-CORE". You can find the recording of the webinar at the following link: https://youtu.be/Bdb8s4Rc4h4?feature=shared
more »
« less
Network resilience trajectories (small scale simulation):Subtitle
The recent decade has seen a rise in community resilience modeling, including a quest to model infrastructure resilience (its exposure, damage, and restoration) under extreme events. These efforts entail measuring, visualizing, and probing alternatives to support mitigation, recovery, and resilience-enhancing interventions. However, the practice demands developing different input sub-models, considering various layers of uncertainty, and integrating these for the final assessment. In this project, we present how the resources of the DesignSafe Cyberinfrastructure (DesignSafe-CI) can support such efforts. We present different tools that can be leveraged from DesignSafe directly or through its interoperability with other platforms, such as the Interdependent Networked Community Resilience Modeling Environment (IN-CORE). We present illustrative examples of how to leverage publicly available data in DesignSafe-CI and models within the IN-CORE platform to create an infrastructure resilience assessment pipeline. These examples are developed and analyzed using JupyterLab in DesignSafe. Furthermore, we present how JupyterLab HPC in DesignSafe-CI enhances the modeling and testing capabilities as the analysis of larger infrastructure systems (e.g., detailed transportation networks) becomes feasible. While the illustrative example uses earthquakes as the hazard type, the leveraged tools, platforms, and shared codes can be adapted to multiple hazards. This project is created to share the material presented on December 11 (2024) in the DesignSafe Webinar "Resilience Assessment of Community Infrastructure: Leveraging HPC Resources at DesignSafe-CI and Interoperability with IN-CORE". You can find the recording of the webinar at the following link: https://youtu.be/Bdb8s4Rc4h4?feature=shared
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2227467
- PAR ID:
- 10571727
- Publisher / Repository:
- Designsafe-CI
- Date Published:
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Jupyter HPC Network Resilience Normalized Network Efficiency IN-CORE Recovery trajectory Risk and resilience assessment Webinar
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Institution:
- DesignSafe CI
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
We studied 11 long-term data infrastructure projects, most of which focused on the Earth Sciences, to understand characteristics that contributed to their project sustainability. Among our sample group, we noted the existence of three different types of project groupings: Database, Framework, and Middleware. Most efforts started as federally funded research projects, and our results show that nearly all became organizations in order to become sustainable. Projects were often funded for short time scales but had the long-term burden of sustaining and supporting open science, interoperability, and community building–activities that are difficult to fund directly. This transition from ‘project’ to ‘organization’ was challenging for most efforts, especially in regard to leadership change and funding issues.Some common approaches to sustainability were identified within each project grouping. Framework and Database projects both relied heavily on the commitment to, and contribution from, a disciplinary community. Framework projects often used bottom-up governance approaches to maintain the active participation and interest of their community. Database projects succeeded when they were able to position themselves as part of the core workflow for disciplinary-specific scientific research. Middleware projects borrowed heavily from sustainability models used by software companies, while maintaining strong scientific partnerships. Cyberinfrastructure for science requires considerable resources to develop and sustain itself, and much of these resources are provided through in-kind support from academics, researchers, and their institutes. It is imperative that more work is done to find appropriate models that help sustain key data infrastructure for Earth Science over the long-term.more » « less
-
As the volume and sophistication of cyber-attacks grow, cybersecurity researchers, engineers and practitioners rely on advanced cyberinfrastructure (CI) techniques like big data and machine learning, as well as advanced CI platforms, e.g., cloud and high-performance computing (HPC) to assess cyber risks, identify and mitigate threats, and achieve defense in depth. There is a training gap where current cybersecurity curricula at many universities do not introduce advanced CI techniques to future cybersecurity workforce. At Old Dominion University (ODU), we are bridging this gap through an innovative training program named DeapSECURE (Data-Enabled Advanced Training Program for Cyber Security Research and Education). We developed six non-degree training modules to expose cybersecurity students to advanced CI platforms and techniques rooted in big data, machine learning, neural networks, and high-performance programming. Each workshop includes a lecture providing the motivation and context for a CI technique, which is then examined during a hands-on session. The modules are delivered through (1) monthly workshops for ODU students, and (2) summer institutes for students from other universities and Research Experiences for Undergraduates participants. Future plan for the training program includes an online continuous learning community as an extension to the workshops, and all learning materials available as open educational resources, which will facilitate widespread adoption, adaptations, and contributions. The project leverages existing partnerships to ensure broad participation and adoption of advanced CI techniques in the cybersecurity community. We employ a rigorous evaluation plan rooted in diverse metrics of success to improve the curriculum and demonstrate its effectiveness.more » « less
-
Technology transfer entails the systematic transference of scientific research results to practical tasks. The research product may be a novel design, an effective process, a tool or a set of tools. Effective technology transfer depends on many factors. It includes recognizing a gap in knowledge, focusing on the end user’s needs, long-term planning, effective communication and collaboration between researchers, standards organizations, and potential users, and a successful reduction of the knowledge or training burden required by the user. This Research Topic provides five examples of robust technology transfer from researchers seeking to mitigate the effect of natural hazards on the built and natural environment—transfers of knowledge that will significantly advance our nation’s resilience in the face of growing natural hazard threats. In 2016, the National Science Foundation established the Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI) network. NHERI provides engineering and social science researchers with access to a world-class research infrastructure to support their efforts to improve the resilience and sustainability of the nation’s civil, natural and social infrastructure against earthquakes, windstorms and associated natural hazards such as tsunami and storm surge in coastal areas. Supported by the National Science Foundation, NHERI is a nation-wide network that consists of 12 university-based, shared-use experimental facilities, a computational modeling and simulation center, and a shared community cyber-infrastructure.more » « less
-
Community resilience is a compelling problem that brings together many disciplines of study. Too often researchers wait until the end of research projects to disseminate findings, and may not include any intentional efforts toward technology translation. Convergence, and particularly the technology transfer aspects of convergence, should be a central goal for resilience research. This paper presents a theory of change proposing community engagement as the intervention needed for realizing actual community resilience. Three illustrative examples simultaneously demonstrate the need for the intervention and are used to provide guidance to researchers interested in learning how to engage. The first example illustrates investigator-driven research via post-hurricane reconnaissance coupled with experimental testing in a wind laboratory. The first example exemplifies technology transfer through regulatory changes. The second example illustrates community-based research via a post-tornado reconnaissance study, and exemplifies technology transfer through industry and outreach publications and public media. The third example illustrates community-driven research that developed a local climate plan, and incorporated the co-production of knowledge. The research translated throughout the project due to the community engaged approach leading to immediate adoption of the final research outcomes. Findings from this paper can be used to help other researchers determine the level of community involvement and navigate technology transfer options based on the goals and context of their own research.more » « less
