More Like this

1. Neighborhood-scale air quality, public health, and equity implications of multi-modal vehicle electrification

   https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/acf60d  

   Visa, Maxime A.; Camilleri, Sara F.; Montgomery, Anastasia; Schnell, Jordan L.; Janssen, Mark; Adelman, Zachariah E.; Anenberg, Susan C.; Grubert, Emily A.; Horton, Daniel E. (September 2023, Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability)

   Abstract Electric vehicles (EVs) constitute just a fraction of the current U.S. transportation fleet; however, EV market share is surging. EV adoption reduces on-road transportation greenhouse gas emissions by decoupling transportation services from petroleum, but impacts on air quality and public health depend on the nature and location of vehicle usage and electricity generation. Here, we use a regulatory-grade chemical transport model and a vehicle-to-electricity generation unit electricity assignment algorithm to characterize neighborhood-scale (∼1 km) air quality and public health benefits and tradeoffs associated with a multi-modal EV transition. We focus on a Chicago-centric regional domain wherein 30% of the on-road transportation fleet is instantaneously electrified and changes in on-road, refueling, and power plant emissions are considered. We find decreases in annual population-weighted domain mean NO₂(−11.83%) and PM_2.5(−2.46%) with concentration reductions of up to −5.1 ppb and −0.98µg m⁻³in urban cores. Conversely, annual population-weighted domain mean maximum daily 8 h average ozone (MDA8O₃) concentrations increase +0.64%, with notable intra-urban changes of up to +2.3 ppb. Despite mixed pollutant concentration outcomes, we find overall positive public health outcomes, largely driven by NO₂concentration reductions that result in outsized mortality rate reductions for people of color, particularly for the Black populations within our domain. 

   more » « less
2. Public Health and Climate Benefits and Trade‐Offs of U.S. Vehicle Electrification

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GH000275  

   Peters, D. R.; Schnell, J. L.; Kinney, P. L.; Naik, V.; Horton, D. E. (October 2020, GeoHealth)

   Abstract Vehicle electrification is a common climate change mitigation strategy, with policymakers invoking co‐beneficial reductions in carbon dioxide (CO₂) and air pollutant emissions. However, while previous studies of U.S. electric vehicle (EV) adoption consistently predict CO₂mitigation benefits, air quality outcomes are equivocal and depend on policies assessed and experimental parameters. We analyze climate and health co‐benefits and trade‐offs of six U.S. EV adoption scenarios: 25% or 75% replacement of conventional internal combustion engine vehicles, each under three different EV‐charging energy generation scenarios. We transfer emissions from tailpipe to power generation plant, simulate interactions of atmospheric chemistry and meteorology using the GFDL‐AM4 chemistry climate model, and assess health consequences and uncertainties using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Benefits Mapping Analysis Program Community Edition (BenMAP‐CE). We find that 25% U.S. EV adoption, with added energy demand sourced from the present‐day electric grid, annually results in a ~242 M ton reduction in CO₂emissions, 437 deaths avoided due to PM_2.5reductions (95% CI: 295, 578), and 98 deaths avoided due to lesser ozone formation (95% CI: 33, 162). Despite some regions experiencing adverse health outcomes, ~$16.8B in damages avoided are predicted. Peak CO₂reductions and health benefits occur with 75% EV adoption and increased emission‐free energy sources (~$70B in damages avoided). When charging‐electricity from aggressive EV adoption is combustion‐only, adverse health outcomes increase substantially, highlighting the importance of low‐to‐zero emission power generation for greater realization of health co‐benefits. Our results provide a more nuanced understanding of the transportation sector's climate change mitigation‐health impact relationship. 

   more » « less
3. US Clean Energy Futures—Air Quality Benefits of Zero Carbon Energy Policies

   https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13091401  

   Vasilakos, Petros N.; Shen, Huizhong; Mehdi, Qasim; Wilcoxen, Peter; Driscoll, Charles; Fallon, Kathy; Burtraw, Dallas; Domeshek, Maya; Russell, Armistead G. (September 2022, Atmosphere)

   In this work, we compare the air quality benefits of a variety of future policy scenarios geared towards controlling EGU (electricity generating units) emissions between the present-day conditions and 2050. While these policies are motivated by reducing CO2 emissions, they also yield significant co-benefits for criteria pollutants, such as ozone and PM2.5. An integrated set of clean energy policies were examined to assess the time-varying costs and benefits of a range of decarbonization strategies, including business as usual and the Affordable Clean Energy plan, with a primary focus on others that look to achieve very low, if not zero, CO2 emissions from the EGU sector by 2050. Benefits assessed include mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions as well as air quality co-benefits. In this introductory work, we describe the potential air quality changes from various clean air policies, to set the stage for upcoming work looking at health and monetized benefits. Emission changes for key pollutants are forecast using the Integrated Planning Model (IPM), which are then transformed into emission inputs for the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ). For all primary scenarios considered that achieve large greenhouse gas decreases, significant reductions in ozone and PM are realized, mainly in the eastern US, and all policies produce air quality benefits. 

   more » « less
4. Air pollution disparities and equality assessments of US national decarbonization strategies

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35098-4  

   Goforth, Teagan; Nock, Destenie (December 2022, Nature Communications)

   Abstract Energy transitions and decarbonization require rapid changes to a nation’s electricity generation mix. There are many feasible decarbonization pathways for the electricity sector, yet there is vast uncertainty about how these pathways will advance or derail the nation’s energy equality goals. We present a framework for investigating how decarbonization pathways, driven by a least-cost paradigm, will impact air pollution inequality across vulnerable groups (e.g., low-income, minorities) in the US. We find that if no decarbonization policies are implemented, Black and high-poverty communities may be burdened with 0.19–0.22 μg/m³higher PM_2.5concentrations than the national average during the energy transition. National mandates requiring more than 80% deployment of renewable or low-carbon technologies achieve equality of air pollution concentrations across all demographic groups. Thus, if least-cost optimization capacity expansion models remain the dominant decision-making paradigm, strict low-carbon or renewable energy technology mandates will have the greatest likelihood of achieving national distributional energy equality. Decarbonization is essential to achieving climate goals, but myopic decarbonization policies that ignore co-pollutants may leave Black and high-poverty communities up to 26–34% higher PM_2.5exposure than national averages over the energy transition. 

   more » « less
5. Potential for Electric Vehicle Adoption to Mitigate Extreme Air Quality Events in China

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001788  

   Schnell, J. L.; Peters, D. R.; Wong, D. C.; Lu, X.; Guo, H.; Zhang, H.; Kinney, P. L.; Horton, D. E. (February 2021, Earth's Future)

   Abstract Electric vehicle (EV) adoption promises potential air pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction co‐benefits. As such, China has aggressively incentivized EV adoption, however much remains unknown with regard to EVs’ mitigation potential, including optimal vehicle type prioritization, power generation contingencies, effects of Clean Air regulations, and the ability of EVs to reduce acute impacts of extreme air quality events. Here, we present a suite of scenarios with a chemistry transport model that assess the potential co‐benefits of EVs during an extreme winter air quality event. We find that regardless of power generation source, heavy‐duty vehicle (HDV) electrification consistently improves air quality in terms of NO₂and fine particulate matter (PM_2.5), potentially avoiding 562 deaths due to acute pollutant exposure during the infamous January 2013 pollution episode (∼1% of total premature mortality). However, HDV electrification does not reduce GHG emissions without enhanced emission‐free electricity generation. In contrast, due to differing emission profiles, light‐duty vehicle (LDV) electrification in China consistently reduces GHG emissions (∼2 Mt CO₂), but results in fewer air quality and human health improvements (145 avoided deaths). The calculated economic impacts for human health endpoints and CO₂reductions for LDV electrification are nearly double those of HDV electrification in present‐day (155M vs. 87M US$), but are within ∼25% when enhanced emission‐free generation is used to power them. Overall, we find only a modest benefit for EVs to ameliorate severe wintertime pollution events, and that continued emission reductions in the power generation sector will have the greatest human health and economic benefits. 

   more » « less