Next-generation sequencing technologies, such as Nanopore MinION, Illumina Hiseq and Novaseq, and PacBio Sequel II, hold immense potential for advancing genomic research on non-model organisms, including the vast majority of marine species. However, application of these technologies to marine invertebrate species is often impeded by challenges in extracting and purifying their genomic DNA due to high polysaccharide content and other secondary metabolites. In this study, we help resolve this issue by developing and testing DNA extraction protocols for Kellet’s whelk (Kelletia kelletii), a subtidal gastropod with ecological and commercial importance, by comparing four DNA extraction methods commonly used in marine invertebrate studies. In our comparison of extraction methods, the Salting Out protocol was the least expensive, produced the highest DNA yields, produced consistent high DNA quality, and had low toxicity. We validated the protocol using an independent set of tissue samples, then applied it to extract high-molecular-weight (HMW) DNA from over three thousand Kellet’s whelk tissue samples. The protocol demonstrated scalability and, with added clean-up, suitability for RAD-seq, GT-seq, as well as whole genome sequencing using both long read (ONT MinION) and short read (Illumina NovaSeq) sequencing platforms. Our findings offer a robust and versatile DNA extraction and clean-up protocol for supporting genomic research on non-model marine organisms, to help mediate the under-representation of invertebrates in genomic studies.
more »
« less
Full 18S metabarcoding of environmental samples of various substrates with Nanopore sequencing. v2
We describe here a flexible protocol for eDNA metabarcoding with Oxford Nanopore's MinIon MK1C platform from sampling to sequencing. The first section summarizes some key steps of sampling and sample preservation for both aquatic and terrestrial environments. The second one describes the DNA extraction protocol with the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit of Qiagen for different types of samples (i.e., soil, liquid and dead plant materials). Our DNA amplification and bead purification protocols are characterized in the third section. Finally, the library prep with the Native amplicon Barcoding Kit 96 V14 (SQK-NBD114.96) and sequencing with the R10.4.1 flow cells (FLO-MIN114) and MinION Mk1C device are presented in the last sections. This protocol has been optimized for protists (microbial eukaryotes) and 18S marker, but should be easily adjustable for other organisms, by modifying the sampling and DNA extraction sections, or other markers, even longer ones such as the full ribosomal operon, if need be. Our goal is to teach/train researchers from different fields and different expertise on obtaining nanopore sequences from environmental samples by guiding them from protocol to protocol, focusing on the key steps, and informing them of the expected results based on our 3 runs performed so far. A comprehensive bioinformatic pipeline to treat the data produced, as well as a methodological article discussing this method and the best ways to use it are in preparation.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2100888
- PAR ID:
- 10574811
- Publisher / Repository:
- Protocols.io
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Institution:
- Protocols.io
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The availability of genetic data from wild populations limits our understanding of primate evolution and conservation, particularly for small nocturnal species such as lorisiforms (galagos, lorises, angwantibos, and pottos). Emerging methods for recovering genomic DNA from historical museum specimens have been rarely used in primate studies. We aimed to optimize extraction and bioinformatics protocols to maximize the recovery of historical DNA to fill important geographic and taxonomic gaps, improve phylogenetic resolution, and inform conservation of Lorisiform primates. First, we compared the performance of two DNA extraction methods by using 238 specimens up to a hundred years old. We then selected 96 samples with the highest DNA yields for shotgun sequencing. To evaluate the impact of phylogenetic divergence in bioinformatic read mapping, we compared coverage depths when using human and three lorisiform reference mitogenomes. Based on whole genomic data, we performed metagenomics and microbial diversity analyses to assess the composition of potentially exogenous content. Lastly, based on the most geographically and taxonomically comprehensive sampling for the West African lorisiforms to date (19/32 currently recognized species), we performed phylogenetic inference using Maximum Likelihood. The results showed that older samples yield lower DNA concentration, with an optimized phenol-chloroform protocol outperforming a commercial kit. However, both extraction methods generated DNA in sufficient amount and quality for phylogenetic inference. Our reference bias comparisons showed that higher phylogenetic proximity between focal species and reference mitogenome increases coverage depth. The metagenomic analysis found human contamination in only one of 96 samples (1%), whereas ten of 96 (11%) samples showed nonnegligible levels of other exogenous contents, among which are certain blood parasites. We inferred low support for the monophyly of Asian and African Lorisids but confirmed the monophyly and previously suggested relationships among Galagid genera. Lastly, we found evidence of cryptic species diversity within the western dwarf galagos (genus Galagoides). Taken together, these results attest to the enormous potential of museomics to advance our understanding of galago evolution, ecology, and conservation, an approach that can be extended to other primate clades.more » « less
-
Abstract Next‐generation sequencing has greatly expanded the utility and value of museum collections by revealing specimens as genomic resources. As the field of museum genomics grows, so does the need for extraction methods that maximize DNA yields. For avian museum specimens, the established method of extracting DNA from toe pads works well for most specimens. However, for some specimens, especially those of birds that are very small or very large, toe pads can be a poor source of DNA. In this study, we apply two DNA extraction methods (phenol–chloroform and silica column) to three different sources of DNA (toe pad, skin punch and bone) from 10 historical avian museum specimens. We show that a modified phenol–chloroform protocol yielded significantly more DNA than a silica column protocol (e.g., Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit) across all tissue types. However, extractions using the silica column protocol contained longer fragments on average than those using the phenol–chloroform protocol, probably as a result of loss of small fragments through the silica column. While toe pads yielded more DNA than skin punches and bone fragments, skin punches proved to be a reliable alternative source of DNA and might be especially appealing when toe pad extractions are impractical. Overall, we found that historical bird museum specimens contain substantial amounts of DNA for genomic studies under most extraction scenarios, but that a phenol–chloroform protocol consistently provides the high quantities of DNA required for most current genomic protocols.more » « less
-
The microbiome is a group of microorganisms living in a particular environment. Microorganisms living in ponds play an important role in the health and balance of these ecosystems. This study aimed to understand how microorganisms vary in different local ponds using metagenomics. Water samples were collected from local ponds around Jackson, Tennessee, to be examined for the presence of microorganisms. DNA was extracted using a standard ethanol precipitation protocol followed by clean-up with a ZymoBIOMICS genomic DNA mini kit. The whole genome DNA was then amplified using the Nanopore Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Barcoding kit due to low DNA yield and to allow multiplexing during DNA sequencing. This process involves fragmentation of the genomic DNA and addition of a linker oligonucleotide using an engineered transposase followed by amplification of the DNA with specific primers containing a unique barcode. All amplified genomic DNA samples were cleaned using MagBeads, prepped for the Genomic libraries, and ran on the Nanopore MinION Mk1c DNA sequencer. DNA reads were analyzed using the Epi2Me What's in My Pot workflow to identify specific microorganisms using standard sequence alignment to NCBI reference sequences. Initial findings showed that the microorganisms differed significantly from pond-to-pond. Each pond had its own unique mix of microorganisms, and some ponds had more diverse microorganisms than others. Various types of bacteria, archaea, and fungi were found, but their abundance and distribution varied across ponds. Environmental factors that were documented to influence diversity of microorganisms were also studied. These factors, including acidity of the water and oxygen levels, seemed to affect the types of microorganisms present. Some connections between specific microorganisms and these environmental factors suggests that they work together in the pond ecosystem. Understanding these differences can contribute to effective management and conservation of local ponds. Further research on how the microorganisms change over time, as well as studying other environmental factors and how the microorganisms function in the ponds. This information can help monitor water quality, protect the environment, and manage ponds more effectively. This work is supported by an HBCU-UP Implementation Project grant from the National Science Foundation EES 2011938.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)DNA extraction protocol for Acropora or other coral tissue based on Qiagen DNAeasy kit. This extraction protocol works well for the Acropora SNPchip and other coral genotyping applications (such as microsatellite genotyping). It preferrentially extracts coral host DNA but some Symbiodiniacea DNA will be present. THIS PROTOCOL ACCOMPANIES THE FOLLOWING PUBLICATION Baums IB, Hughes CR, Hellberg MH (2005) Mendelian microsatellite loci for the Caribbean coral Acropora palmata. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 288:115-127. doi:10.3354/meps288115. dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bgjqjumwmore » « less
An official website of the United States government

