An official website of the United States government
The task of SQL query equivalence checking is important in various real-world applications (including query rewriting and automated grading) that involve complex queries with integrity constraints; yet, state-of-the-art techniques are very limited in their capability of reasoning about complex features (e.g., those that involve sorting, case statement, rich integrity constraints, etc.) in real-life queries. To the best of our knowledge, we propose the first SMT-based approach and its implementation, VeriEQL, capable of proving and disproving bounded equivalence of complex SQL queries. VeriEQL is based on a new logical encoding that models query semantics over symbolic tuples using the theory of integers with uninterpreted functions. It is simple yet highly practical -- our comprehensive evaluation on over 20,000 benchmarks shows that VeriEQL outperforms all state-of-the-art techniques by more than one order of magnitude in terms of the number of benchmarks that can be proved or disproved. VeriEQL can also generate counterexamples that facilitate many downstream tasks (such as finding serious bugs in systems like MySQL and Apache Calcite).
more »
« less
QED: A Powerful Query Equivalence Decider for SQL
Checking query equivalence is of great significance in database systems. Prior work in automated query equivalence checking sets the first steps in formally modeling and reasoning about query optimization rules, but only supports a limited number of query features. In this paper, we present Qed, a new framework for query equivalence checking based on bag semantics. Qed uses a new formalism called Q-expressions that models queries using different normal forms for efficient equivalence checking, and models features such as integrity constraints and NULLs in a principled way unlike prior work. Our formalism also allows us to define a new query fragment that encompasses many real-world queries with a complete equivalence checking algorithm, assuming a complete first-order theory solver. Empirically, Qed can verify 299 out of 444 query pairs extracted from the Calcite framework and 979 out of 1287 query pairs extracted from CockroachDB, which is more than 2× the number of cases proven by prior state-of-the-art solver.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10575735
- Publisher / Repository:
- VLDB
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
- Volume:
- 17
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 2150-8097
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 3602 to 3614
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
In database-as-a-service platforms, automated ver-ification of query equivalence helps eliminate redundant computation in the form of overlapping sub-queries. Researchers have proposed two pragmatic techniques to tackle this problem. The first approach consists of reducing the queries to algebraic expressions and proving their equivalence using an algebraic theory. The limitations of this technique are threefold. It cannot prove the equivalence of queries with significant differences in the attributes of their relational operators (e.g., predicates in the filter operator). It does not support certain widely-used SQL features (e.g., NULL values). Its verification procedure is computationally intensive. The second approach transforms this problem to a constraint satisfaction problem and leverages a general-purpose solver to determine query equivalence. This technique consists of deriving the symbolic representation of the queries and proving their equivalence by determining the query containment relationship between the symbolic expressions. While the latter approach addresses all the limitations of the former technique, it only proves the equivalence of queries under set semantics (i.e., output tables must not contain duplicate tuples). However, in practice, database applications use bag semantics (i.e., output tables may contain duplicate tuples) In this paper, we introduce a novel symbolic approach for proving query equivalence under bag semantics. We transform the problem of proving query equivalence under bag semantics to that of proving the existence of a bijective, identity map between tuples returned by the queries on all valid inputs. We classify SQL queries into four categories, and propose a set of novel category-specific verification algorithms. We implement this symbolic approach in SPES and demonstrate that it proves the equivalence of a larger set of query pairs (95/232) under bag semantics compared to the SOTA tools based on algebraic (30/232) and symbolic approaches (67/232) under set and bag semantics, respectively. Furthermore, SPES is 3X faster than the symbolic tool that proves equivalence under set semantics.more » « less
-
Proving the equivalence between SQL queries is a fundamental problem in database research. Existing solvers model queries using algebraic representations and convert such representations into first-order logic formulas so that query equivalence can be verified by solving a satisfiability problem. The main challenge lies in unbounded summations, which appear commonly in a query's algebraic representation in order to model common SQL features, such as projection and aggregate functions. Unfortunately, existing solvers handle unbounded summations in an ad-hoc manner based on heuristics or syntax comparison, which severely limits the set of queries that can be supported. This paper develops a new SQL equivalence prover called SQLSolver, which can handle unbounded summations in a principled way. Our key insight is to use the theory of LIA^*, which extends linear integer arithmetic formulas with unbounded sums and provides algorithms to translate a LIA^* formula to a LIA formula that can be decided using existing SMT solvers. We augment the basic LIA^* theory to handle several complex scenarios (such as nested unbounded summations) that arise from modeling real-world queries. We evaluate SQLSolver with 359 equivalent query pairs derived from the SQL rewrite rules in Calcite and Spark SQL. SQLSolver successfully proves 346 pairs of them, which significantly outperforms existing provers.more » « less
-
We study the classical evaluation problem for regular path queries: Given an edge-labeled graph and a regular path query, compute the set of pairs of vertices that are connected by paths that match the query. The Product Graph (PG) is the established evaluation approach for regular path queries. PG first constructs the product automaton of the data graph and the query and then uses breadth-first search to find the accepting states reachable from each initial state in the product automaton. Its data complexity is O(|V|⋅|E|), where V and E are the sets of vertices and respectively edges in the data graph. This complexity cannot be improved by combinatorial algorithms. In this paper, we introduce OSPG, an output-sensitive refinement of PG, whose data complexity is O(|E|3/2+ min(OUT⋅√|E|, |V|⋅|E|)), where OUT is the number of distinct vertex pairs in the query output. OSPG's complexity is at most that of PG and can be asymptotically smaller for small output and sparse input. The improvement of OSPG over PG is due to the unnecessary time wasted by PG in the breadth-first search phase, in case a few output pairs are eventually discovered. For queries without Kleene star, the complexity of OSPG can be further improved to O(|E| + |E|⋅√OUT).more » « less
-
In this paper we investigate the problem of quantifying the contribution of each variable to the satisfying assignments of a Boolean function based on the Shapley value. Our main result is a polynomial-time equivalence between computing Shapley values and model counting for any class of Boolean functions that are closed under substitutions of variables with disjunctions of fresh variables. This result settles an open problem raised in prior work, which sought to connect the Shapley value computation to probabilistic query evaluation. We show two applications of our result. First, the Shapley values can be computed in polynomial time over deterministic and decomposable circuits, since they are closed under OR-substitutions. Second, there is a polynomial-time equivalence between computing the Shapley value for the tuples contributing to the answer of a Boolean conjunctive query and counting the models in the lineage of the query. This equivalence allows us to immediately recover the dichotomy for Shapley value computation in case of self-join-free Boolean conjunctive queries; in particular, the hardness for non-hierarchical queries can now be shown using a simple reduction from the \#P-hard problem of model counting for lineage in positive bipartite disjunctive normal form.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.14778/3681954.3682024
