More Like this

1. INNOVATION, INNOVATION POLICIES, AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA

   https://doi.org/10.1080/00167428.2019.1684194  

   Li, Dandan; Wei, Yehua Dennis; Miao, Changhong; Chen, Wen (October 2020, Geographical Review)

   null (Ed.)
2. Product innovation and process innovation in a dynamic Stackelberg game

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.02.042  

   Wang, Yufang; Wang, Xinyu; Chang, Shuhua; Kang, Yun (April 2019, Computers & Industrial Engineering)
3. Fitness Consequences of Innovation in Spotted Hyenas

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00443  

   Johnson-Ulrich, Lily; Benson-Amram, Sarah; Holekamp, Kay E. (November 2019, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution)
4. Gender differences in peer review of innovation

   https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1429  

   Belz, Andrea_P; Graddy‐Reed, Alexandra; Hanewicz, Isabel; J_Terrile, Richard (June 2022, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal)

   Abstract Research SummaryGender differences in peer review and the associated impact on innovation financing are well documented but less well understood. We study peer review in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Small Business Innovation Research program, a public initiative seeking to increase women's access to innovation funds. We theorize that reviewers use status characteristics inappropriately as heuristics and create gender bias. Econometric analysis shows evidence of direct bias against female applicants, an effect linked to challenges for newcomers in demonstrating individual legitimacy rather than concerns about the organizational legitimacy of the associated firm. We also demonstrate a corrective redistribution to reverse this bias and create equity in the funding outcome. As these results negatively impact diversity in innovation, we propose policy recommendations to overcome this bias. Managerial SummaryPeer review is an important mechanism to rank and select technical proposals for funding. We examine the role of gender in a government program conducting this process. Controlling for the proposal quality and other factors, we show that the gender of the proposer is linked to lower scores. This effect is associated with proposals from females who are new to the program, suggesting their challenges in demonstrating credibility as leaders of these projects, and exacerbated by the fact that women represent a disproportionately high share of newcomers. Subsequently, the program reverses this bias such that the funding outcomes do not show the same inequities. This has important implications for policies supporting gender diversity in innovation. 

   more » « less
5. Collection Innovation

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3358608  

   Gerber, Elizabeth M.; Nickerson, Jeffrey V.; Dontcheva, Mira; Dabbish, Laura; Hill, Charlie (January 2019, CSCW’19 Companion)

   As people increasingly innovate outside of formal R&D departments, individuals take on the responsibility of attracting, managing, and protecting social, financial, human, and information capital. With internet technology playing a central role in how individuals work together to produce something that they could not produce alone, it is necessary to understand how technologies are shaping the innovation process from start to finish. We bring together human-computer interaction researchers and industry leaders who have worked with people and platforms designed to support collective innovation across diverse domains. We will discuss the current and future research on the role of platforms in collective innovation, including topics in social computing, crowdsourcing, peer production, online communities, gig economy, & online marketplaces. 

   more » « less