An official website of the United States government
Abstract Predator feeding rates (described by their functional response) must saturate at high prey densities. Although thousands of manipulative functional response experiments show feeding rate saturation at high densities under controlled conditions, it remains unclearhowsaturated feeding rates are at natural prey densities. The general degree of feeding rate saturation has important implications for the processes determining feeding rates and how they respond to changes in prey density. To address this, we linked two databases—one of functional response parameters and one on mass–abundance scaling—through prey mass to calculate a feeding rate saturation index. We find that: (1) feeding rates may commonly be unsaturated and (2) the degree of saturation varies with predator and prey taxonomic identities and body sizes, habitat, interaction dimension and temperature. These results reshape our conceptualisation of predator–prey interactions in nature and suggest new research on the ecological and evolutionary implications of unsaturated feeding rates.
more »
« less
Simple, universal rules predict trophic interaction strengths
Abstract Many critical drivers of ecological systems exhibit regular scaling relationships, yet the underlying mechanisms explaining these relationships are often unknown. Trophic interaction strengths, which underpin ecosystem stability and dynamics, are no exception, exhibiting statistical scaling relationships with predator and prey traits that lack causal, evolutionary explanations. Here we propose two universal rules to explain the scaling of trophic interaction strengths through the relationship between a predator’s feeding rate and its prey’s density --- the so-called predator functional response. First, functional responses must allow predators to meet their energetic demands when prey are rare. Second, functional responses should approach their maxima near the highest prey densities that predators experience. We show that independently parameterized mathematical equations derived from these two rules predict functional response parameters across over 2,100 functional response experiments. The rules further predict consistent patterns of feeding rate saturation among predators, a slow-fast continuum among functional response parameters, and the allometric scaling of those parameters. The two rules thereby offer a potential ultimate explanation for the determinants of trophic interaction strengths and their scaling, revealing the importance of ecologically realized constraints to the complex, adaptive nature of functional response evolution.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2129758
- PAR ID:
- 10578133
- Publisher / Repository:
- bioRxiv
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Institution:
- bioRxiv
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract How strongly predators and prey interact is both notoriously context dependent and difficult to measure. Yet across taxa, interaction strength is strongly related to predator size, prey size and prey density, suggesting that general cross‐taxonomic relationships could be used to predict how strongly individual species interact.Here, we ask how accurately do general size‐scaling relationships predict variation in interaction strength between specific species that vary in size and density across space and time?To address this question, we quantified the size and density dependence of the functional response of the California spiny lobsterPanulirus interruptus, foraging on a key ecosystem engineer, the purple sea urchinStrongylocentrotus purpuratus, in experimental mesocosms. Based on these results, we then estimated variation in lobster–urchin interaction strength across five sites and 9 years of observational data. Finally, we compared our experimental estimates to predictions based on general size‐scaling relationships from the literature.Our results reveal that predator and prey body size has the greatest effect on interaction strength when prey abundance is high. Due to consistently high urchin densities in the field, our simulations suggest that body size—relative to density—accounted for up to 87% of the spatio‐temporal variation in interaction strength. However, general size‐scaling relationships failed to predict the magnitude of interactions between lobster and urchin; even the best prediction from the literature was, on average, an order of magnitude (+18.7×) different than our experimental predictions.Harvest and climate change are driving reductions in the average body size of many marine species. Anticipating how reductions in body size will alter species interactions is critical to managing marine systems in an ecosystem context. Our results highlight the extent to which differences in size‐frequency distributions can drive dramatic variation in the strength of interactions across narrow spatial and temporal scales. Furthermore, our work suggests that species‐specific estimates for the scaling of interaction strength with body size, rather than general size‐scaling relationships, are necessary to quantitatively predict how reductions in body size will alter interaction strengths.more » « less
-
Ecological niches are pivotal in addressing questions of species richness gradients like the Latitudinal Diversity Gradient (LDG). The Hutchinsonian niche hypervolume model and derivatives are some of the most proven tools. Accordingly, species occupy mathematically convenient spaces in relation to functional, especially trophic, relationships, as well as the physical environment. In one application, the number of species in a community is a function of average niche sizes, overlaps, and total niche volume. Alternatively, the number of coexisting species derives from invasibility criteria in relation to species-interaction modules. The daunting complexity of tropical communities begs the question of how well these ecologically inspired paradigms accommodate present knowledge of species interactions and functional relationships. Recent studies of hyperdiverse tropical insectivorous bird species suggests reevaluating the applicability of such concepts. Here I review Neotropical, arthropod-feeding bird species interactions needed to explain these species’ trophic relationships, including their diets, feeding substrates, and behavioral and morphological traits relevant to resource acquisition. Important emergent generalizations include extraordinary specializations on both prey resource locations (substrates) and behaviors, rather than on particular resourcesper se, and a preponderance of adaptations to exploit the anti-predator traits of prey, traits evolved in response to other predators. These specializations and implicit arms races necessitate evolutionary approaches to niches necessary to understand the relevant natural history and ecology, how these species compete interspecifically, and even how these predator species interact with preyviaevolutionary enhancements. These findings, compared and contrasted with prevailing concepts and findings, suggest expanding niche concepts to accommodate both the large temporal and regional geographic scales to understand the accumulated species richness of the mainland Neotropics. These trophic specializations also highlight why many of these birds are so sensitive to human disturbances, especially habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation.more » « less
-
Abstract Phenotypic features define feeding selectivity in planktonic predators and therefore determine energy flow through food webs. In current‐feeding cnidarian hydromedusae, swimming and predation are coupled such that swimming also brings prey into contact with feeding structures. Fluid mechanical disturbances may initiate escape responses by flow‐sensing prey. Previous studies have not considered how fluid signals define the trophic niche of current‐feeding gelatinous predators. We used the hydromedusaClytia gregariato determine (1) how passive (sinking) and active (swimming) feeding behavior affects pre‐encounter responses of prey to the medusae‐induced fluid motion, and (2) how prey responses affect the medusae's ingestion efficiencies. Videography of the predation process showed that passive prey such as invertebrate larvae were ingested during both feeding behaviors, whereas flow‐sensing prey such as copepods escaped the predator's active feeding behavior, but were unable to detect the predator's passive sinking behavior and were ingested (KWX2= 19.8246, df = 4,p < 0.001). Flow visualizations using particle image velocimetry (PIV) showed fluid deformation values during passive feeding below threshold values that trigger escape responses of copepods. To address whether fluid signals mediate prey capture, we compared fluid signals produced by three hydromedusae with different diets.Aequorea victoriaandMitrocoma cellulariaproduced higher deformation thanC. gregaria(two‐way ANOVA,F2,52= 5.532,p= 0.007), which explains their previously documented negative selection for flow‐sensing prey like copepods. Through the analysis of hydromedusan feeding behaviors and pre‐encounter prey escapes, we provide evidence that fluid signatures shape the trophic niches of gelatinous predators.more » « less
-
Abstract Predators mediate the strength of trophic cascades indirectly by decreasing the number of prey consuming a basal resource and by altering prey responses that dictate prey foraging. The strength of these indirect effects further depends on abiotic factors. For example, attributes of the environment, such as turbulent flows in aquatic habitats that disrupt spatial information available from chemical cues, can impose “sensory stresses” that impair the ability of predators or prey to detect each other. The multi-faceted impacts of sensory stress on both the predators and prey create challenges in predicting the overall effect on the trophic cascade. Here, we explore how sensory stress affects the strength of trophic cascades using a tri-trophic dynamical model that incorporates the sensory environment and anti-predatory responses. We explore two crucial parameters that govern outcomes of the model. First, we allow predation rates to either strengthen or weaken depending on whether prey or predators are more sensitive to sensory stress, respectively. Second, we explore scenarios where anti-predatory responses can either drive a strong or weak reduction in prey foraging. We find that sensory stress usually weakens trophic cascades except in scenarios where predators are relatively unaffected by sensory stress and the loss of anti-predatory responses does not affect prey foraging. The model finally suggests that “hydra effects” can manifest, whereby an increase in prey population occurs despite an increase in per capita predation. This last feature emerges due to the interaction between logistic growth of the basal resource and anti-predatory responses reducing the over-consumption of the basal resource.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Posted Content:
- https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.26.605380
