An official website of the United States government
An edge‐ordered graph is a graph with a linear ordering of its edges. Two edge‐ordered graphs areequivalentif there is an isomorphism between them preserving the edge‐ordering. Theedge‐ordered Ramsey number redge(H; q) of an edge‐ordered graphHis the smallestNsuch that there exists an edge‐ordered graphGonNvertices such that, for everyq‐coloring of the edges ofG, there is a monochromatic subgraph ofGequivalent toH. Recently, Balko and Vizer proved thatredge(H; q) exists, but their proof gave enormous upper bounds on these numbers. We give a new proof with a much better bound, showing there exists a constantcsuch thatfor every edge‐ordered graphHonnvertices. We also prove a polynomial bound for the edge‐ordered Ramsey number of graphs of bounded degeneracy. Finally, we prove a strengthening for graphs where every edge has a label and the labels do not necessarily have an ordering.
more »
« less
Online Ramsey Numbers of Ordered Paths and Cycles
An ordered graph is a graph with a linear ordering on its vertices. The online Ramsey game for ordered graphs $$G$$ and $$H$$ is played on an infinite sequence of vertices; on each turn, Builder draws an edge between two vertices, and Painter colors it red or blue. Builder tries to create a red $$G$$ or a blue $$H$$ as quickly as possible, while Painter wants the opposite. The online ordered Ramsey number $$r_o(G,H)$$ is the number of turns the game lasts with optimal play. In this paper, we consider the behavior of $$r_o(G,P_n)$$ for fixed $$G$$, where $$P_n$$ is the monotone ordered path. We prove an $$O(n \log n)$$ bound on $$r_o(G,P_n)$$ for all $$G$$ and an $O(n)$ bound when $$G$$ is $$3$$-ichromatic; we partially classify graphs $$G$$ with $$r_o(G,P_n) = n + O(1)$$. Many of these results extend to $$r_o(G,C_n)$$, where $$C_n$$ is an ordered cycle obtained from $$P_n$$ by adding one edge.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1839918
- PAR ID:
- 10579600
- Publisher / Repository:
- Electronic Journal of Combinatorics
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 1077-8926
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
We study the following question raised by Erdős and Hajnal in the early 90’s. Over all n n -vertex graphs G G what is the smallest possible value of m m for which any m m vertices of G G contain both a clique and an independent set of size log n \log n ? We construct examples showing that m m is at most 2 2 ( log log n ) 1 / 2 + o ( 1 ) 2^{2^{(\log \log n)^{1/2+o(1)}}} obtaining a twofold sub-polynomial improvement over the upper bound of about n \sqrt {n} coming from the natural guess, the random graph. Our (probabilistic) construction gives rise to new examples of Ramsey graphs, which while having no very large homogenous subsets contain both cliques and independent sets of size log n \log n in any small subset of vertices. This is very far from being true in random graphs. Our proofs are based on an interplay between taking lexicographic products and using randomness.more » « less
-
Extremal combinatorics often deals with problems of maximizing a specific quantity related to substructures in large discrete structures. The first question of this kind that comes to one's mind is perhaps determining the maximum possible number of induced subgraphs isomorphic to a fixed graph $$H$$ in an $$n$$-vertex graph. The asymptotic behavior of this number is captured by the limit of the ratio of the maximum number of induced subgraphs isomorphic to $$H$$ and the number of all subgraphs with the same number vertices as $$H$$; this quantity is known as the _inducibility_ of $$H$$. More generally, one can define the inducibility of a family of graphs in the analogous way.Among all graphs with $$k$$ vertices, the only two graphs with inducibility equal to one are the empty graph and the complete graph. However, how large can the inducibility of other graphs with $$k$$ vertices be? Fix $$k$$, consider a graph with $$n$$ vertices join each pair of vertices independently by an edge with probability $$\binom{k}{2}^{-1}$$. The expected number of $$k$$-vertex induced subgraphs with exactly one edge is $$e^{-1}+o(1)$$. So, the inducibility of large graphs with a single edge is at least $$e^{-1}+o(1)$$. This article establishes that this bound is the best possible in the following stronger form, which proves a conjecture of Alon, Hefetz, Krivelevich and Tyomkyn: the inducibility of the family of $$k$$-vertex graphs with exactly $$l$$ edges where $$0<\binom{k}{2}$$ is at most $$e^{-1}+o(1)$$. The example above shows that this is tight for $l=1$ and it can be also shown to be tight for $l=k-1$. The conjecture was known to be true in the regime where $$l$$ is superlinearly bounded away from $$0$$ and $$\binom{k}{2}$$, for which the sum of the inducibilities goes to zero, and also in the regime where $$l$$ is bounded away from $$0$$ and $$\binom{k}{2}$$ by a sufficiently large linear function. The article resolves the hardest cases where $$l$$ is linearly close to $$0$$ or close to $$\binom{k}{2}$$, and provides generalizations to hypergraphs.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Given a weighted planar bipartite graph G ( A ∪ B , E ) where each edge has an integer edge cost, we give an Õ( n 4/3 log nC ) time algorithm to compute minimum-cost perfect matching; here C is the maximum edge cost in the graph. The previous best-known planarity exploiting algorithm has a running time of O ( n 3/2 log n ) and is achieved by using planar separators (Lipton and Tarjan ’80). Our algorithm is based on the bit-scaling paradigm (Gabow and Tarjan ’89). For each scale, our algorithm first executes O ( n 1/3 ) iterations of Gabow and Tarjan’s algorithm in O ( n 4/3 ) time leaving only O ( n 2/3 ) vertices unmatched. Next, it constructs a compressed residual graph H with O ( n 2/3 ) vertices and O ( n ) edges. This is achieved by using an r -division of the planar graph G with r = n 2/3 . For each partition of the r -division, there is an edge between two vertices of H if and only if they are connected by a directed path inside the partition. Using existing efficient shortest-path data structures, the remaining O ( n 2/3 ) vertices are matched by iteratively computing a minimum-cost augmenting path, each taking Õ( n 2/3 ) time. Augmentation changes the residual graph, so the algorithm updates the compressed representation for each partition affected by the change in Õ( n 2/3 ) time. We bound the total number of affected partitions over all the augmenting paths by O ( n 2/3 log n ). Therefore, the total time taken by the algorithm is Õ( n 4/3 ).more » « less
-
Meka, Raghu (Ed.)Given a weighted graph G = (V,E,w), a (β, ε)-hopset H is an edge set such that for any s,t ∈ V, where s can reach t in G, there is a path from s to t in G ∪ H which uses at most β hops whose length is in the range [dist_G(s,t), (1+ε)dist_G(s,t)]. We break away from the traditional question that asks for a hopset H that achieves small |H| and small diameter β and instead study the sensitivity of H, a new quality measure. The sensitivity of a vertex (or edge) given a hopset H is, informally, the number of times a single hop in G ∪ H bypasses it; a bit more formally, assuming shortest paths in G are unique, it is the number of hopset edges (s,t) ∈ H such that the vertex (or edge) is contained in the unique st-path in G having length exactly dist_G(s,t). The sensitivity associated with H is then the maximum sensitivity over all vertices (or edges). The highlights of our results are: - A construction for (Õ(√n), 0)-hopsets on undirected graphs with O(log n) sensitivity, complemented with a lower bound showing that Õ(√n) is tight up to polylogarithmic factors for any construction with polylogarithmic sensitivity. - A construction for (n^o(1), ε)-hopsets on undirected graphs with n^o(1) sensitivity for any ε > 0 that is at least inverse polylogarithmic, complemented with a lower bound on the tradeoff between β, ε, and the sensitivity. - We define a notion of sensitivity for β-shortcut sets (which are the reachability analogues of hopsets) and give a construction for Õ(√n)-shortcut sets on directed graphs with O(log n) sensitivity, complemented with a lower bound showing that β = Ω̃(n^{1/3}) for any construction with polylogarithmic sensitivity. We believe hopset sensitivity is a natural measure in and of itself, and could potentially find use in a diverse range of contexts. More concretely, the notion of hopset sensitivity is also directly motivated by the Differentially Private All Sets Range Queries problem [Deng et al. WADS 23]. Our result for O(log n) sensitivity (Õ(√n), 0)-hopsets on undirected graphs immediately improves the current best-known upper bound on utility from Õ(n^{1/3}) to Õ(n^{1/4}) in the pure-DP setting, which is tight up to polylogarithmic factors.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.37236/11610
