An official website of the United States government
Abstract This study investigates the intermodel spread of the Northern Hemisphere winter stratospheric polar vortex change to anthropogenic greenhouse gas increase in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models. Previous proposed mechanisms for the polar vortex response to climate change, based on analysis of atmosphere‐only models, are found inadequate to explain the intermodel spread in the coupled models in CMIP5. It is further found that resolved stationary wave driving in the polar vortex region accounts for less than 30% of the intermodel spread, and intermodel differences in both the vertical and meridional wave propagation contribute to differences in the wave driving. The results call for a detailed budget analysis of the stratospheric circulation response by including both the resolved and parameterized processes through the Dynamics and Variability Model Intercomparison Project. The results also highlight a need for an improved theoretical understanding of future projected polar vortex change and intermodel spread.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on December 1, 2025
The Community-Based Road to CMIP7 in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) held its 14th annual workshop, with almost 70 in-person participants and 15 remote participants for a robust discussion about future experiments and community needs in light of phase 7 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP7).
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2017113
- PAR ID:
- 10581252
- Publisher / Repository:
- American Meteorological Society
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
- Volume:
- 105
- Issue:
- 12
- ISSN:
- 0003-0007
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- E2324 to E2329
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract. Projection of the contribution of ice sheets to sea level change as part ofthe Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) takes the formof simulations from coupled ice sheet–climate models and stand-alone icesheet models, overseen by the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project forCMIP6 (ISMIP6). This paper describes the experimental setup forprocess-based sea level change projections to be performed with stand-aloneGreenland and Antarctic ice sheet models in the context of ISMIP6. TheISMIP6 protocol relies on a suite of polar atmospheric and oceanicCMIP-based forcing for ice sheet models, in order to explore the uncertaintyin projected sea level change due to future emissions scenarios, CMIPmodels, ice sheet models, and parameterizations for ice–ocean interactions.We describe here the approach taken for defining the suite of ISMIP6stand-alone ice sheet simulations, document the experimental framework andimplementation, and present an overview of the ISMIP6 forcing to beused by participating ice sheet modeling groups.more » « less
-
Abstract A single column model with parameterized large‐scale (LS) dynamics is used to better understand the response of steady‐state tropical precipitation to relative sea surface temperature under various representations of radiation, convection, and circulation. The large‐scale dynamics are parametrized via the weak temperature gradient (WTG), damped gravity wave (DGW), and spectral weak temperature gradient (Spectral WTG) method in NCAR's Single Column Atmosphere Model (SCAM6). Radiative cooling is either specified or interactive, and the convective parameterization is run using two different values of a parameter that controls the degree of convective inhibition. Results are interpreted in the context of the Global Atmospheric System Studies ‐Weak Temperature Gradient (GASS‐WTG) Intercomparison project. Using the same parameter settings and simulation configuration as in the GASS‐WTG Intercomparison project, SCAM6 under the WTG and DGW methods produces erratic results, suggestive of numerical instability. However, when key parameters are changed to weaken the large‐scale circulation's damping of tropospheric temperature variations, SCAM6 performs comparably to single column models in the GASS‐WTG Intercomparison project. The Spectral WTG method is less sensitive to changes in convection and radiation than are the other two methods, performing qualitatively similarly across all configurations considered. Under all three methods, circulation strength, represented in 1D by grid‐scale vertical velocity, is decreased when barriers to convection are reduced. This effect is most extreme under specified radiative cooling, and is shown to come from increased static stability in the column's reference radiative‐convective equilibrium profile. This argument can be extended to interactive radiation cases as well, though perhaps less conclusively.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract. The University of Victoria Earth System Climate Model (UVic ESCM) ofintermediate complexity has been a useful tool in recent assessments oflong-term climate changes, including both paleo-climate modelling anduncertainty assessments of future warming. Since the last official releaseof the UVic ESCM 2.9 and the two official updates during the last decade,considerable model development has taken place among multiple researchgroups. The new version 2.10 of the University of Victoria Earth SystemClimate Model presented here will be part of the sixth phaseof the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). More precisely it willbe used in the intercomparison of Earth system models of intermediatecomplexity (EMIC), such as the C4MIP, the Carbon Dioxide Removal and ZeroEmissions Commitment model intercomparison projects (CDR-MIP and ZECMIP,respectively). It now brings together and combines multiple modeldevelopments and new components that have come about since the lastofficial release of the model. The main additions to the base model are(i) an improved biogeochemistry module for the ocean, (ii) a vertically resolvedsoil model including dynamic hydrology and soil carbon processes, and (iii) arepresentation of permafrost carbon. To set the foundation of its use, wehere describe the UVic ESCM 2.10 and evaluate results from transienthistorical simulations against observational data. We find that the UVicESCM 2.10 is capable of reproducing changes in historical temperature andcarbon fluxes well. The spatial distribution of many ocean tracers,including temperature, salinity, phosphate and nitrate, also agree well withobserved tracer profiles. The good performance in the ocean tracers isconnected to an improved representation of ocean physical properties. Forthe moment, the main biases that remain are a vegetation carbon density thatis too high in the tropics, a higher than observed change in the ocean heatcontent (OHC) and an oxygen utilization in the Southern Ocean that is too low.All of these biases will be addressed in the next updates to the model.more » « less
-
Abstract This study quantifies the contribution of individual cloud feedbacks to the total short‐term cloud feedback in satellite observations over the period 2002–2014 and evaluates how they are represented in climate models. The observed positive total cloud feedback is primarily due to positive high‐cloud altitude, extratropical high‐ and low‐cloud optical depth, and land cloud amount feedbacks partially offset by negative tropical marine low‐cloud feedback. Seventeen models from the Atmosphere Model Intercomparison Project of the sixth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project are analyzed. The models generally reproduce the observed moderate positive short‐term cloud feedback. However, compared to satellite estimates, the models are systematically high‐biased in tropical marine low‐cloud and land cloud amount feedbacks and systematically low‐biased in high‐cloud altitude and extratropical high‐ and low‐cloud optical depth feedbacks. Errors in modeled short‐term cloud feedback components identified in this analysis highlight the need for improvements in model simulations of the response of high clouds and tropical marine low clouds. Our results suggest that skill in simulating interannual cloud feedback components may not indicate skill in simulating long‐term cloud feedback components.more » « less
