skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Model supports asymmetric regulation across the intercellular junction for collective cell polarization
Symmetry breaking, which is ubiquitous in biological cells, functionally enables directed cell movement and organized embryogenesis. Prior to movement, cells break symmetry to form a well-defined cell front and rear in a process called polarization. In developing and regenerating tissues, collective cell movement requires the coordination of the polarity of the migration machineries of neighboring cells. Though several works shed light on the molecular basis of polarity, fewer studies have focused on the regulation across the cell-cell junction required for collective polarization, thus limiting our ability to connect tissue-level dynamics to subcellular interactions. Here, we investigated how polarity signals are communicated from one cell to its neighbor to ensure coordinated front-to-rear symmetry breaking with the same orientation across the group. In a theoretical setting, we systematically searched a variety of intercellular interactions and identified that co-alignment arrangement of the polarity axes in groups of two and four cells can only be achieved with strong asymmetric regulation of Rho GTPases or enhanced assembly of complementary F-actin structures across the junction. Our results held if we further assumed the presence of an external stimulus, intrinsic cell-to-cell variability, or larger groups. The results underline the potential of using quantitative models to probe the molecular interactions required for macroscopic biological phenomena. Lastly, we posit that asymmetric regulation is achieved through junction proteins and predict that in the absence of cytoplasmic tails of such linker proteins, the likeliness of doublet co-polarity is greatly diminished.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2209494
PAR ID:
10582043
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Editor(s):
Vavylonis, Dimitrios
Publisher / Repository:
PLoS Computational Biology
Date Published:
Journal Name:
PLOS Computational Biology
Volume:
20
Issue:
12
ISSN:
1553-7358
Page Range / eLocation ID:
e1012216
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; (, Journal of Cell Science)
    ABSTRACT Cell polarization in response to chemical gradients is important in development and homeostasis across eukaryota. Chemosensing cells orient toward or away from gradient sources by polarizing along a front–rear axis. Using the mating response of budding yeast as a model of chemotropic cell polarization, we found that Dcv1, a member of the claudin superfamily, influences front–rear polarity. Although Dcv1 localized uniformly on the plasma membrane (PM) of vegetative cells, it was confined to the rear of cells responding to pheromone, away from the pheromone receptor. dcv1Δ conferred mislocalization of sensory, polarity and trafficking proteins, as well as PM lipids. These phenotypes correlated with defects in pheromone-gradient tracking and cell fusion. We propose that Dcv1 helps demarcate the mating-specific front domain primarily by restricting PM lipid distribution. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; (, Cells)
    Cell polarity refers to the asymmetric distribution of proteins and other molecules along a specified axis within a cell. Polarity establishment is the first step in many cellular processes. For example, directed growth or migration requires the formation of a cell front and back. In many cases, polarity occurs in the absence of spatial cues. That is, the cell undergoes symmetry breaking. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that allow cells to break symmetry and polarize requires computational models that span multiple spatial and temporal scales. Here, we apply a multiscale modeling approach to examine the polarity circuit of yeast. In addition to symmetry breaking, experiments revealed two key features of the yeast polarity circuit: bistability and rapid dismantling of the polarity site following a loss of signal. We used modeling based on ordinary differential equations (ODEs) to investigate mechanisms that generate these behaviors. Our analysis revealed that a model involving positive and negative feedback acting on different time scales captured both features. We then extend our ODE model into a coarse-grained reaction–diffusion equation (RDE) model to capture the spatial profiles of polarity factors. After establishing that the coarse-grained RDE model qualitatively captures key features of the polarity circuit, we expand it to more accurately capture the biochemical reactions involved in the system. We convert the expanded model to a particle-based model that resolves individual molecules and captures fluctuations that arise from the stochastic nature of biochemical reactions. Our models assume that negative regulation results from negative feedback. However, experimental observations do not rule out the possibility that negative regulation occurs through an incoherent feedforward loop. Therefore, we conclude by using our RDE model to suggest how negative feedback might be distinguished from incoherent feedforward regulation. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, Biochemical Society Transactions)
    Migrating cell collectives navigate complex tissue environments both during normal development and in pathological contexts such as tumor invasion and metastasis. To do this, cells in collectives must stay together but also communicate information across the group. The cadherin superfamily of proteins mediates junctional adhesions between cells, but also serve many essential functions in collective cell migration. Besides keeping migrating cell collectives cohesive, cadherins help follower cells maintain their attachment to leader cells, transfer information about front-rear polarity among the cohort, sense and respond to changes in the tissue environment, and promote intracellular signaling, in addition to other cellular behaviors. In this review, we highlight recent studies that reveal diverse but critical roles for both classical and atypical cadherins in collective cell migration, specifically focusing on four in vivo model systems in development: the Drosophila border cells, zebrafish mesendodermal cells, Drosophila follicle rotation, and Xenopus neural crest cells. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; (, The Plant Cell)
    Abstract Polarization of cells prior to asymmetric cell division is crucial for correct cell divisions, cell fate, and tissue patterning. In maize (Zea mays) stomatal development, the polarization of subsidiary mother cells (SMCs) prior to asymmetric division is controlled by the BRICK (BRK)–PANGLOSS (PAN)–RHO FAMILY GTPASE (ROP) pathway. Two catalytically inactive receptor-like kinases, PAN2 and PAN1, are required for correct division plane positioning. Proteins in the BRK–PAN–ROP pathway are polarized in SMCs, with the polarization of each protein dependent on the previous one. As most of the known proteins in this pathway do not physically interact, possible interactors that might participate in the pathway are yet to be described. We identified WEAK CHLOROPLAST MOVEMENT UNDER BLUE LIGHT 1 (WEB1)/PLASTID MOVEMENT IMPAIRED 2 (PMI2)-RELATED (WPR) proteins as players during SMC polarization in maize. WPRs physically interact with PAN receptors and polarly accumulate in SMCs. The polarized localization of WPR proteins depends on PAN2 but not PAN1. CRISPR–Cas9-induced mutations result in division plane defects in SMCs, and ectopic expression of WPR-RFP results in stomatal defects and alterations to the actin cytoskeleton. We show that certain WPR proteins directly interact with F-actin through their N-terminus. Our data implicate WPR proteins as potentially regulating actin filaments, providing insight into their molecular function. These results demonstrate that WPR proteins are important for cell polarization. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Nature Communications)
    Abstract Cell migration regulates diverse (patho)physiological processes, including cancer metastasis. According to the Osmotic Engine Model, polarization of NHE1 at the leading edge of confined cells facilitates water uptake, cell protrusion and motility. The physiological relevance of the Osmotic Engine Model and the identity of molecules mediating cell rear shrinkage remain elusive. Here, we demonstrate that NHE1 and SWELL1 preferentially polarize at the cell leading and trailing edges, respectively, mediate cell volume regulation, cell dissemination from spheroids and confined migration. SWELL1 polarization confers migration direction and efficiency, as predicted mathematically and determined experimentally via optogenetic spatiotemporal regulation. Optogenetic RhoA activation at the cell front triggers SWELL1 re-distribution and migration direction reversal in SWELL1-expressing, but not SWELL1-knockdown, cells. Efficient cell reversal also requires Cdc42, which controls NHE1 repolarization. Dual NHE1/SWELL1 knockdown inhibits breast cancer cell extravasation and metastasis in vivo, thereby illustrating the physiological significance of the Osmotic Engine Model. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email